Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The distain for people who choose to work in education across the DCUM forums is so sad.
The reality is that, at current pay rates, education (higher education & k-12) aren’t attracting the best & the brightest in most settings.
Are you willing to pay more in taxes or tuition?
No. I think schools should have harder applications so fewer kids apply. And I think standardized test scores should play a bigger role to cull a batch of apps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Univ Prof here. I agree with the main observation of this thread. Admissions offices are being staffed, on average, by poorly trained and poorly educated folks (who are, in general, MUCH less able than folks they are screening). Fact of life and it will not change.
Seriously?
I've yet to meet an admissions person who is "MUCH less able than folks they are screening." I've met a variety of folks with a variety skills - none in the "MUCH less" category.
Also, did you not get the memo that many PT AO staff are work study students and many entry-level FT employees are recent college grads. That reflects more on their professors than anything else.
But if this is the case on your campus, then what steps are you taking to increase pay in order to attract better trained and educated talent (as well as what improvements are you making in your classroom to improve the quality of your college's grads?)?
Anonymous wrote:Yale has 6500+ administrators
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: how can you expect the “best and brightest” to be reading your kids’ applications when none of you would apparently encourage (or allow?) your own best and brightest kids to pursue a job like this?
I’m not convinced the offices want to hire the best and brightest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The distain for people who choose to work in education across the DCUM forums is so sad.
The reality is that, at current pay rates, education (higher education & k-12) aren’t attracting the best & the brightest in most settings.
Are you willing to pay more in taxes or tuition?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The distain for people who choose to work in education across the DCUM forums is so sad.
The reality is that, at current pay rates, education (higher education & k-12) aren’t attracting the best & the brightest in most settings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Univ Prof here. I agree with the main observation of this thread. Admissions offices are being staffed, on average, by poorly trained and poorly educated folks (who are, in general, MUCH less able than folks they are screening). Fact of life and it will not change.
Seriously?
I've yet to meet an admissions person who is "MUCH less able than folks they are screening." I've met a variety of folks with a variety skills - none in the "MUCH less" category.
Also, did you not get the memo that many PT AO staff are work study students and many entry-level FT employees are recent college grads. That reflects more on their professors than anything else.
But if this is the case on your campus, then what steps are you taking to increase pay in order to attract better trained and educated talent (as well as what improvements are you making in your classroom to improve the quality of your college's grads?)?
Raising pay means either raising tuition or cutting somewhere else. Neither will happen just so that AOs can make more money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: how can you expect the “best and brightest” to be reading your kids’ applications when none of you would apparently encourage (or allow?) your own best and brightest kids to pursue a job like this?
At my child's prestigious private college the starting salary for an admissions counselor is 38K. Who exactly do they think is going to take a job like that? People wearing clothes from the sales bin at Target interviewing high school students carrying 400 dollar purses. Great look.
No one gets rich in higher ed. I work in this field because I believe that education can be transformational, and that high quality, affordable education is fundamental to a functioning democracy. There is no correlation between salary, education and experience in higher education: I have a masters and am on my way to a doctorate and earn south of 65k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The distain for people who choose to work in education across the DCUM forums is so sad.
The reality is that, at current pay rates, education (higher education & k-12) aren’t attracting the best & the brightest in most settings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: how can you expect the “best and brightest” to be reading your kids’ applications when none of you would apparently encourage (or allow?) your own best and brightest kids to pursue a job like this?
At my child's prestigious private college the starting salary for an admissions counselor is 38K. Who exactly do they think is going to take a job like that? People wearing clothes from the sales bin at Target interviewing high school students carrying 400 dollar purses. Great look.