Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?
Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots
Hookup culture is gross
Tattoos are gross and should be taxed
Onlyfans and porn is gross
Broken families are terrible
Too many bastards are being born
OP here and I agree
Anonymous wrote:I think that IVF should only be legal for women under 40.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.
Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.
NP - so strange. This is why person holing people based on a single issue is stupid. It’s been to Dems detriment.
Detriment? You are not paying attention. This issue is bringing out voters and driving election outcomes. Is it just men and clueless women on this thread? Get it through your thick skills...forced birth policies are a huge deal and are not going to be tolerated. That's it.
What? The response was that pigeon-hoping people on single issues as dem or gop is stupid. I said nothing about the issue. If you think x, you must be a dem or gop supporter. Dumb, dumb, dumb. I don’t fully agree with OP. I wish more major party people would feel comfortable expressing where they don’t fully align with their party. They are not all 100% in on 100% of issues. There was a time you could be anti-abortion and a Dem, and pro-abortion and be a GOPer. Now each party demands complete outward adherence to an orthodoxy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope.
Your options are pro-life/Christian Nationalism, or else democrats.
Nope. The options are fascist, speech-policing imbeciles, or else Republicans.
DP
So no choice at all, is what you are saying.
Democrats certainly don't offer a "choice" when it comes to speaking and opinions. There is only your way, or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks.
If anything, Democrats are too accepting of varying opinions.
The exception, of course, is they don’t tolerate intolerance. Which makes sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope.
Your options are pro-life/Christian Nationalism, or else democrats.
Nope. The options are fascist, speech-policing imbeciles, or else Republicans.
DP
So no choice at all, is what you are saying.
Democrats certainly don't offer a "choice" when it comes to speaking and opinions. There is only your way, or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?
Tough on crime/anti gay rights/pro gun/pro church in politics
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.
How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?
Larry Hogan is the classic moderate republican; and amazingly, he is loved by just about everyone in Maryland, which is a solid democratic state. The only people who didn't like him were the uber-leftist local politicians of MoCo.
And me! Not a politician. Didn’t like his conservative politics. Hated his policy on starting school after Labor Day.
Obviously he was not as horrid as MAGA politicians. But that’s a low bar.
Still doesn't change the fact that he's a moderate Republican, which clearly you don't like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.
How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?
Larry Hogan is the classic moderate republican; and amazingly, he is loved by just about everyone in Maryland, which is a solid democratic state. The only people who didn't like him were the uber-leftist local politicians of MoCo.
And me! Not a politician. Didn’t like his conservative politics. Hated his policy on starting school after Labor Day.
Obviously he was not as horrid as MAGA politicians. But that’s a low bar.
Still doesn't change the fact that he's a moderate Republican, which clearly you don't like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
DP. That's why I would consider Bill Clinton an ideal candidate. I'm also a Republican and I'm pro-choice, as well as all the other things PP listed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Agreed. I'm an Independent and in some ways, one would think I'm conservative because of all these things; pro-police, strong border control, thinks trans women have no place in women's sports.. However, I am pro-choice and very much pro-gun control. I feel like I don't have a home in either party.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.
Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.
NP - so strange. This is why person holing people based on a single issue is stupid. It’s been to Dems detriment.
Detriment? You are not paying attention. This issue is bringing out voters and driving election outcomes. Is it just men and clueless women on this thread? Get it through your thick skills...forced birth policies are a huge deal and are not going to be tolerated. That's it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.
How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?
Larry Hogan is the classic moderate republican; and amazingly, he is loved by just about everyone in Maryland, which is a solid democratic state. The only people who didn't like him were the uber-leftist local politicians of MoCo.
And me! Not a politician. Didn’t like his conservative politics. Hated his policy on starting school after Labor Day.
Obviously he was not as horrid as MAGA politicians. But that’s a low bar.
Anonymous wrote:
Children born of single parents in China can’t get health insurance. This is known. Thus, single parenthood is nonexistent!
Rebublicans want to screw over our future generations by turning back the clock on their god given rights. That is going on right now in America so china will have to handle its own effed up reproductive rights situation for the time being.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.
Show me a thriving, healthy, ethnically diverse community.