Anonymous wrote:Nothing's wrong if Harvard becomes 70% Asians just like Howard is 80% Blacks.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing's wrong if Harvard becomes 70% Asians just like Howard is 80% Blacks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Asians want clear transparent rules, no discrimination, and fair competition. Is that too much to ask?
Elite schools don’t care about test scores, they care about leadership qualities, grit & sociability. Part-time jobs in high school are important, too.
my DC has all those qualities, PT job, leader, social, quite well spoken (debate team), and near perfect SAT scores and high GPA from a magnet, but Asian.
So did my Asian kid and they were admitted to multiple schools. And guess what? Their classmates are mostly white and Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:supermen court case is not about holistic admissions - it’s about race
Schools will use holistic admissions to get around the case and take who they want
It’s not hard to tell from zip codes and such.
Case isn’t radically changing admissions. Schools will find a way to take wh they want.
Asian was around 18% in 2014 when the lawsuit began.
It increased gradually over the years and now 30%.
I think it had an effect.
Sure they'll have some room to wiggle around, but need to be very careful now.
Huge costly law suits can come in any time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sound of white people crying over selective college admissions is amazing.
Supreme court is going to rule on affirmative action later this year.
Look at Caltech's demographics to see the future. (Caltech is race-blind)
I don't think they are race-blind. If they were race blind they would have 0 Latino or Black students just like TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sound of white people crying over selective college admissions is amazing.
Supreme court is going to rule on affirmative action later this year.
Look at Caltech's demographics to see the future. (Caltech is race-blind)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since people are obsessed with racial demographics, according to the article:
Asians: 29.9
Black: 15.3
Latino: 11.3
Native American: 2
Hawaiian: .5
Total: 59%
Implication: whites are 41%
US racial demographics- tried to find current data and found this for 18-24 y/o as of 2021: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/11207-young-adult-population-ages-18-to-24-by-race-and-ethnicity#detailed/1/any/false/2048/68,69,67,12,70,66,71,7983/21595,21596
Asians: 6%
Black: 14%
Latino: 23%
Native American: 1%
Hawaiian: .5%
White: 53%
Interesting. Technically speaking, whites are visibly underrepresented, as are Latinos, if the goal is to have Harvard's student body mirror national demographics. We could add an overlay of faith but that gets tricker so let's leave it aside for now. We all know Harvard doesn't admit on merit, so it's not really clear what they're looking for in the ideal student body as they also don't have proportional racial demographic mix either.
Has this always been Harvard’s goal?
Asians have long been over represented, which is what makes the lawsuit so stupid
Anonymous wrote:But no reputable US university is transparent and admits on merit alone! Then all schools would have the same ranked accepted list. Each kid can only select one school.
Why is this all about Harvard? I don’t get it. If everyone hates Harvard, then why do you want your kid to attend? What story do you want to tell. “They were forced to accept us LOL”.
There are 3000 universities. These conversations are like a scorned woman Who only wants the guy who doesn’t want them. Pitiful and embarrassing!
Is the goal for schools to be all Asian? Let’s say we get what we asking for…. Most top kids aren’t going to attend a school that has changed what made it elite over the past 100+ years. Companies aren’t going to hire from a school if they only admit based on grades/race. And these top schools won’t have alumni athletes, presidents, CEOs, etc.
Harvards admit rate is so low because so many with a glimmer of hope throw their name in the hat…. Like playing the lottery with no real expectation to win. If they only admit 1600 SAT scores and 4.0 unweighted Gpa then only those students would even apply. Is the goal for Harvard to have a near 100% acceptance rate? Then the UNCs and UVAs won’t accept tip-top kids because they’ll assume they all got accepted/will attend T10 schools. Oh But then we’ll just sue UVA!
Alumni, legacy, admit rate….. This is the brand. why do we even want to Go to a school whose brand would be diluted?
But that’s not going to happen. Sorry! College admissions are changing, race is changing; race was created to separate us. It was created to discriminate - one day everyone will be mixed. Maybe except for my Asian friends who are the ones so stuck on race and education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since people are obsessed with racial demographics, according to the article:
Asians: 29.9
Black: 15.3
Latino: 11.3
Native American: 2
Hawaiian: .5
Total: 59%
Implication: whites are 41%
US racial demographics- tried to find current data and found this for 18-24 y/o as of 2021: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/11207-young-adult-population-ages-18-to-24-by-race-and-ethnicity#detailed/1/any/false/2048/68,69,67,12,70,66,71,7983/21595,21596
Asians: 6%
Black: 14%
Latino: 23%
Native American: 1%
Hawaiian: .5%
White: 53%
Interesting. Technically speaking, whites are visibly underrepresented, as are Latinos, if the goal is to have Harvard's student body mirror national demographics. We could add an overlay of faith but that gets tricker so let's leave it aside for now. We all know Harvard doesn't admit on merit, so it's not really clear what they're looking for in the ideal student body as they also don't have proportional racial demographic mix either.
Has this always been Harvard’s goal?
Asians have long been over represented, which is what makes the lawsuit so stupid
Anonymous wrote:supermen court case is not about holistic admissions - it’s about race
Schools will use holistic admissions to get around the case and take who they want
It’s not hard to tell from zip codes and such.
Case isn’t radically changing admissions. Schools will find a way to take wh they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sound of white people crying over selective college admissions is amazing.
Supreme court is going to rule on affirmative action later this year.
Anonymous wrote:Since people are obsessed with racial demographics, according to the article:
Asians: 29.9
Black: 15.3
Latino: 11.3
Native American: 2
Hawaiian: .5
Total: 59%
Implication: whites are 41%
US racial demographics- tried to find current data and found this for 18-24 y/o as of 2021: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/11207-young-adult-population-ages-18-to-24-by-race-and-ethnicity#detailed/1/any/false/2048/68,69,67,12,70,66,71,7983/21595,21596
Asians: 6%
Black: 14%
Latino: 23%
Native American: 1%
Hawaiian: .5%
White: 53%
Interesting. Technically speaking, whites are visibly underrepresented, as are Latinos, if the goal is to have Harvard's student body mirror national demographics. We could add an overlay of faith but that gets tricker so let's leave it aside for now. We all know Harvard doesn't admit on merit, so it's not really clear what they're looking for in the ideal student body as they also don't have proportional racial demographic mix either.