Anonymous wrote:Counting majors is a poor way to determine the worth of a department. A lot of students take a math class, or a foreign language class, but few actually major in math or a foreign language. A better count would be how many students a department educates.
Anonymous wrote:Counting majors is a poor way to determine the worth of a department. A lot of students take a math class, or a foreign language class, but few actually major in math or a foreign language. A better count would be how many students a department educates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you should be arguing for the creation of vocational colleges, which I heartily support, rather than the shutting down of the humanities. It's quite short-sighted to devalue the humanities.
Did you read stories and picture books to your children?
Do you read anything besides technical manuals?
Appreciate art?
Listen to music?
Dance?
Learn about history?
Travel for pleasure?
Speak a foreign language?
Watch shows or movies?
Use well-designed product or live in a beautiful building?
Wear clothes that you find pleasing?
Enjoy strolling through gardens and parks?
Talk with your friends, families, and neighbors about anything besides STEM topics?
Listen to news on the radio?
Read about news in the papers?
Have any interest in political movements?
Care about legal rights, the constitution, justice?
Partake in any cultural or religious events or rituals (baptisms, graduations, weddings, funerals, etc.)?
Maybe you just needed more of a humanities education to be grateful for how much of the humanities are a part of a beautiful life?
-A prof in the humanities
You don't need to pay shit ton of money to college for all these
Yep, imagine the New York Times written by a bunch of high school grads! A Supreme Court full of justices that never studied history, even better!
Looking at recent decisions, I would prefer justices who took a few more science classes even if it came at the expense of history classes
Anonymous wrote:I think the main issue that this post highlights is that higher education should be more affordable, not that we need to eliminate liberal arts and humanities from college studies. There is societal value in having an educated populace but individuals should not have to go into personal debt for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was an English major. Admittedly, I chose it because I didn't really have a passion at the time. It taught me to read, write, communicate, and analyze, and I am a better practitioner of what I do now because of it. 90% of my professional accolades and praise come from my ability to communicate, which is much better than my colleagues who are only trained in our field.
The fact that the majority of institutions making these cuts are doing so in a climate of financial hardship on the edge of an enrollment cliff (which is a totally different financial crisis) doesn't convince me they are making the cuts for the right reasons.
The New Yorker article had interviews with Columbia and Harvard Faculty about their declining numbers. Schools are cutting in response to student interest. It's hard to justify massive departments when fewer kids are choosing the major year after year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College is becoming a modern-day vocational school.
Thanks goodness.
Go to vocational school if that is what you want to buy. Why educate yourself if you are don't value an educated mind?
Get over yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ChatGpt replaces the need for english majors, except for them to work on the chatgpt engine
Have you read some of this material? It has a long way to go.
Have you seen the recent upgrade? It's come very far in an extremely short period time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in the humanities. I have 4 degrees, and they were all completely free (1 degree is from overseas and 2 are Ivy League). I make a comfortable living in my field at a job I love that really gives me the chance to help students. I never took a STEM course after high school and don't care if my kids do either if that's not their bliss; conversely, if they want that pathway, I will do everything possible to support them.
There's nothing useless about what I do or about the students who want to study it. It's just not CS or STEM. But I have a hard time believing my field shouldn't have the right to exist. If people don't want to study it, they don't have to. But humanities are actually pretty cheap to maintain at the University level in terms of costs. The main reason to discontinue programs is so that salaried positions can be eliminated, not because the programs themselves are considered to be intellectually useless.
Getting rid of the humanities is kind of like saying anyone who doesn't have the height shouldn't play basketball after age 16 because it's just a waste of energy since they can't turn pro. But there are lots of good things that can come from pursuing a sport on the nonprofessional level. The humanities are the same way: they train your mind in certain habits and skills that STEM presentations just don't do. Maybe you don't feel you or your student want or need those things. That's OK with me, but there are still plenty of folks who do want and need them. And as long as that's the case, I'm lucky to be part of it.
How many faculty slots should a department struggling to attract majors be allotted when other departments have to turn away prospective majors due to overwhelming demand?
Sure. Harvard should ditch their divinity school faculty. Because who needs any of that useless religion stuff anyways, right?
SMH
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ChatGpt replaces the need for english majors, except for them to work on the chatgpt engine
Have you read some of this material? It has a long way to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in the humanities. I have 4 degrees, and they were all completely free (1 degree is from overseas and 2 are Ivy League). I make a comfortable living in my field at a job I love that really gives me the chance to help students. I never took a STEM course after high school and don't care if my kids do either if that's not their bliss; conversely, if they want that pathway, I will do everything possible to support them.
There's nothing useless about what I do or about the students who want to study it. It's just not CS or STEM. But I have a hard time believing my field shouldn't have the right to exist. If people don't want to study it, they don't have to. But humanities are actually pretty cheap to maintain at the University level in terms of costs. The main reason to discontinue programs is so that salaried positions can be eliminated, not because the programs themselves are considered to be intellectually useless.
Getting rid of the humanities is kind of like saying anyone who doesn't have the height shouldn't play basketball after age 16 because it's just a waste of energy since they can't turn pro. But there are lots of good things that can come from pursuing a sport on the nonprofessional level. The humanities are the same way: they train your mind in certain habits and skills that STEM presentations just don't do. Maybe you don't feel you or your student want or need those things. That's OK with me, but there are still plenty of folks who do want and need them. And as long as that's the case, I'm lucky to be part of it.
How many faculty slots should a department struggling to attract majors be allotted when other departments have to turn away prospective majors due to overwhelming demand?
Sure. Harvard should ditch their divinity school faculty. Because who needs any of that useless religion stuff anyways, right?
SMH
Anonymous wrote:I think the main issue that this post highlights is that higher education should be more affordable, not that we need to eliminate liberal arts and humanities from college studies. There is societal value in having an educated populace but individuals should not have to go into personal debt for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ChatGpt replaces the need for english majors, except for them to work on the chatgpt engine
Have you read some of this material? It has a long way to go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College is becoming a modern-day vocational school.
Thanks goodness.
Go to vocational school if that is what you want to buy. Why educate yourself if you are don't value an educated mind?