Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
You act as if the BF is required to join. He’s free to say ‘no, thank you’ or pay for a room if the arrangements are not to his liking.
…and never hear the end of it from the “It’s FINE, what’s the big DEAL” types like OP. They’ll gossip about how difficult or uppity he is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
You act as if the BF is required to join. He’s free to say ‘no, thank you’ or pay for a room if the arrangements are not to his liking.
…and never hear the end of it from the “It’s FINE, what’s the big DEAL” types like OP. They’ll gossip about how difficult or uppity he is.
You clearly have not read OP's follow up. The guy sounds totally go-with-the-flow and so do OP's kids. OP is going to ask her daughter. So out of touch to suggest a vacation cannot be a vacation if the accommodations are not to your standards.
Anonymous wrote:I would never put the unmarried couple in the same room. I would plan to be gone, and let them know, "the rest of us are leaving for the evening. We'll be home at 10pm" Plan, inform, and don't come home before that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
Bullsh*t. My family vacations were one hotel room for a family of 5.
F-A-M-I-L-Y. Not family and one random friend or significant other. That’s against fire code, BTW. That’s against hotel policy at many places. Not that types like you care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
You act as if the BF is required to join. He’s free to say ‘no, thank you’ or pay for a room if the arrangements are not to his liking.
…and never hear the end of it from the “It’s FINE, what’s the big DEAL” types like OP. They’ll gossip about how difficult or uppity he is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people stop suggesting 3 rooms now? OP said they're used to piling 5 into a room. 3 rooms ain't happening here.
Then the boyfriend tagging along just shouldn’t be happening. It’s just weird and inappropriate to make your two teenage kids share a room with your adult daughter and her boyfriend (regardless of whether they claim to be okay with it) and also wildly unfair to expect your two teenage kids to bunk with their parents for a vacation so that adult daughter and boyfriend(who presumably aren’t contributing to the vacation cost) can have their own room.
It's 3 college kids and a HS kid so I really don't think it's that weird. When I was in college I piled into many a hotel room with 6+ people, some I knew better than others.
There’s a big difference between you opting to sleep with a group of friends/acquaintances when traveling on a vacation of your choosing versus being forced by your parents to share a room with your sister and her boyfriend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
Bullsh*t. My family vacations were one hotel room for a family of 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
You act as if the BF is required to join. He’s free to say ‘no, thank you’ or pay for a room if the arrangements are not to his liking.
Anonymous wrote:If you can’t afford enough hotel rooms to make people feel comfortable on the vacation, you can’t afford the “vacation.” Three rooms or don’t go. Just no. YOU are the crazy ILs everyone complains about, and you’re not even ILs yet!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people stop suggesting 3 rooms now? OP said they're used to piling 5 into a room. 3 rooms ain't happening here.
Then the boyfriend tagging along just shouldn’t be happening. It’s just weird and inappropriate to make your two teenage kids share a room with your adult daughter and her boyfriend (regardless of whether they claim to be okay with it) and also wildly unfair to expect your two teenage kids to bunk with their parents for a vacation so that adult daughter and boyfriend(who presumably aren’t contributing to the vacation cost) can have their own room.
It's 3 college kids and a HS kid so I really don't think it's that weird. When I was in college I piled into many a hotel room with 6+ people, some I knew better than others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They’re adults. Let them sleep together. Honestly, I wouldn’t want to sleep in a room with my MIL and SIL, so I’d likely decline any trip that has that stipulation. He may feel the same.
No, boys and girls rooms until marriage. You want to promote this behavior in front of the siblings?
Ooh what “behavior”?