Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!
Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?
Anonymous wrote:NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
Another NP who does not have a kid on this team. What kind of adult calls out specific kids and ridicules them? You are the kind that gives so many "lax bro" dads their very deserved reputation of never growing up. I would be ashamed to have you as my spouse or - worse - parent.
Anonymous wrote:For those interested, the McDonogh - Gonzaga game will be streamed live this evening, faceoff is at 6 PM. Link is below, should be a great game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUezamubpsQ
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!
Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?
NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Even less impressive for GC
Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!
Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?
NP. Nice language STA booster. Scrimmages don't count and SJC would destroy STA based on this weeks play level. STA lost to Severn this week pretty badly, so not a good start to the season. Yesterday, STA's UPenn LSM did not do much, besides fall down a few times. He certainly did not play like a "beast". Also, their UPenn fogo had a ton of errors. Not an impressive showing for STA, to say the least.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Don't be a dick. STA has a few individual talented players... their LSM is a beast!
Didn't STA play SJC in a scrimmage and it was very competitive for 3 quarters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
GC isn’t good. If that was a competitive game STA isn’t good either. No need to watch.
Anonymous wrote:Madlax needs to stick to a top 5 or 10. No need to rank any further than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9
Game was much closer than the final score suggests. GC down by one at the half (6-5). Both teams played fairly equal.......equally bad. STA looks worse than last year and will have a rough time in the IAC again this year.
Anonymous wrote:Results from Yesterday:
STA: 13, Good Counsel: 9