Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading this my kid is never getting into college anywhere she wants to go. She’s a B+ student at top private in DC. She loves shopping at Target. Maybe she should just get a job there and throw in the towel.
I think you are just joking but on the off-chance you are not, your daughter is likely getting a great education and will get into a bunch of schools with the right list. The good news is so many colleges are out there and she can be successful from so many different choices. I think where people get in trouble is when they have a “top college” or bust mentality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, rich kids do fine OP, even if they are mediocre students or people
HW is really rigorous academically—definitely comparable to the DC big 3.
I have only scanned this thread, so maybe it has been touched on, but HW seems to have far fewer graduates with GPAs around 3.1 and under than the "big 3." StA, Sidwell, NCS, Potomac--all have a higher number of students around the 3.0. HW=grade inflation, just like everywhere else.
Again, this is a small sample of probably no more than the same 50-100 kids, all of whom are unhooked. You cannot reach any conclusions about the GPAs of the school as a whole from this.
With 201 applications to Michigan, I'm pretty sure the sample is bigger than 50-100...
Okay, sure, call it 200 or so, but the point is that there are going to be a lot of repeats in the group, because unhooked kids necessarily cast a very wide net. Each data point in their chart is not one unique student and people in this thread are acting like it is.
My guess is that a chart like this from most top privates would look very similar as far as GPA ranges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, rich kids do fine OP, even if they are mediocre students or people
HW is really rigorous academically—definitely comparable to the DC big 3.
I have only scanned this thread, so maybe it has been touched on, but HW seems to have far fewer graduates with GPAs around 3.1 and under than the "big 3." StA, Sidwell, NCS, Potomac--all have a higher number of students around the 3.0. HW=grade inflation, just like everywhere else.
Again, this is a small sample of probably no more than the same 50-100 kids, all of whom are unhooked. You cannot reach any conclusions about the GPAs of the school as a whole from this.
With 201 applications to Michigan, I'm pretty sure the sample is bigger than 50-100...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, rich kids do fine OP, even if they are mediocre students or people
HW is really rigorous academically—definitely comparable to the DC big 3.
I have only scanned this thread, so maybe it has been touched on, but HW seems to have far fewer graduates with GPAs around 3.1 and under than the "big 3." StA, Sidwell, NCS, Potomac--all have a higher number of students around the 3.0. HW=grade inflation, just like everywhere else.
Again, this is a small sample of probably no more than the same 50-100 kids, all of whom are unhooked. You cannot reach any conclusions about the GPAs of the school as a whole from this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The more I read and learn about GDS the more I think that this school does nothing to build resilience in their students and parents just bulldoze their way for them.
It has nothing to do with resilience. Here's what this thread says - GDS CCO gives no data (as in zero) to kids or parents in making college list. The list from HW sowed the GDS parents who saw it posted what other peer schools do/can do. And we know that local peers make scattergrams available. We also know that scattergrams can be unrealizable (includes hooks) and the HW data excludes sports or legacy hooks. So this is possible. GDS just chooses to go with a "trust your heart" strategy coupled with CCO pushing every kid to ED at a middle 50th school.
So parents look at that, compare to what they see from friend parents at Potomac, Albans/NCS/Sidwell and decide this is BS and go pay $5k to 10k to get outside counselor...who will never have the same type of data GDS CCo has on GPA.
So there we are. It has nothing to do with resilience unless you are just sniping because you see some parents rightfully complaining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, rich kids do fine OP, even if they are mediocre students or people
HW is really rigorous academically—definitely comparable to the DC big 3.
I have only scanned this thread, so maybe it has been touched on, but HW seems to have far fewer graduates with GPAs around 3.1 and under than the "big 3." StA, Sidwell, NCS, Potomac--all have a higher number of students around the 3.0. HW=grade inflation, just like everywhere else.
Anonymous wrote:I would hate to be a college counselor at a top private school.
Sounds very stressful dealing with neurotic and entitled parents and kids.
We are at a private school but I have to just say it - parental expectations are sky high and not always reasonable.
Many parents are high fliers in society and professionally. They are used to getting what they want. It does not always work out that way for college admissions
Anonymous wrote:The more I read and learn about GDS the more I think that this school does nothing to build resilience in their students and parents just bulldoze their way for them.
Anonymous wrote:Reading this my kid is never getting into college anywhere she wants to go. She’s a B+ student at top private in DC. She loves shopping at Target. Maybe she should just get a job there and throw in the towel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading this my kid is never getting into college anywhere she wants to go. She’s a B+ student at top private in DC. She loves shopping at Target. Maybe she should just get a job there and throw in the towel.
I have a B student at a top private feeling very badly right now as deferall, waitlist, and her first rejection even, come rolling in. It is not a fun situation. And my DD is no slacker. A hard-working, caring, talented athlete, with ADHD who got a C and C+ during remote learning her freshman year from which there was no recovering. Had between 3.5 and 3.7 every semester since, but there was just no recovering. Very depressing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah that list is interesting - with the exception of NYU there doesn't seem to be any huge advantage to HW. Really shocked that 26 applications to UNC netted 0 acceptances - what's going on there?? Or Stanford, wouldn't you think they'd have more than 7 acceptances out of 86 applications? Same with UVA, Princeton, MIT, Harvard - these numbers don't look out of line with what you'd expect from any HS.
current HW parent here and also parent of a graduate. I should continue reading but I stopped here to say a couple of things. Different high schools are different feeders for different colleges. HW has been a feeder to UChicago, Michigan, NYU, WUSTL, and lately to Penn.
Historically, HW doesn't feed to Princeton, UNC, or Pomona. UVA is brutal; we explored it in depth with our oldest kid's dean (college counselor) because we have Virginia ties, but the dean was pretty clear that DC was not going to get in (DC applied anyways, but was accepted ED somewhere else so pulled the UVA application). UVA has that mandate to take VA kids, and they do (or used to) consider OOS kids of UVA parents as in-state (legacy), so that combo basically wipes out an OOS kid with no UVA parent or no athletic hook.
HW kids apply to Michigan because of California politics. The University of California schools have a mandate to accept the top 10% of *public* CA high school seniors. So if your kid goes to a CA private, it's a very difficult to get into the UCs.
Want to say a few other things:
1) There are tons of kids there that are not rich. Their financial aid program is amazing (it's almost unbelievable; can't say enough about it).
2) While there are kids who have celebrity parents there, they are a minority; they just shine bright.
3) What I do think HW kids have in abundance is legacy parents. DH and I do not have legacy anywhere and it is tricky--as most of you know, your DCs are competing for colleges against their own high school class. Since legacy is a hook in an ED or SCEA round, an unhooked kid has to be strategic about what schools to apply for, if applying ED or SCEA.
This is helpful info. HW seems like a wonderful school. The campus looks amazing.
UVA may have a regional bias.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading this my kid is never getting into college anywhere she wants to go. She’s a B+ student at top private in DC. She loves shopping at Target. Maybe she should just get a job there and throw in the towel.
I have a B student at a top private feeling very badly right now as deferall, waitlist, and her first rejection even, come rolling in. It is not a fun situation. And my DD is no slacker. A hard-working, caring, talented athlete, with ADHD who got a C and C+ during remote learning her freshman year from which there was no recovering. Had between 3.5 and 3.7 every semester since, but there was just no recovering. Very depressing.
Anonymous wrote:Reading this my kid is never getting into college anywhere she wants to go. She’s a B+ student at top private in DC. She loves shopping at Target. Maybe she should just get a job there and throw in the towel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Generally, rich kids do fine OP, even if they are mediocre students or people
HW is really rigorous academically—definitely comparable to the DC big 3.