Anonymous wrote:UMBC. Picked it during the pandemic so limited visits etc. DD lucked into a great group of suitemates. Awesome teaching. Seems to do fun things on campus. Is really happy there. Was definitely a true safety for her, heard back early from them with their biggest scholarship, didn’t really consider it until she started thinking about it more in comparison to other her other schools. She likes that it’s diverse socioeconomically and ethnically- feels like MCPS in that way. Friendly. Helpful administration. Nice dorm. Terrible food though.
Anonymous wrote:If your child ends up having to attend their "safety" school, doesn't that by definition mean that it was in fact the most appropriate fit from the beginning?
Anonymous wrote:If your child ends up having to attend their "safety" school, doesn't that by definition mean that it was in fact the most appropriate fit from the beginning?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UMD-CP! My child (soph) loves it
? UMDCP is a safety for most kids? I know a few magnet kids in MCPS who didn't get in.
Not a safety. Anyone who lives in MD wants to go their b/c of the tuition. Highly selective just because of the number of applicants.
Safety is relative. And, if you have really high stats, you should be good at UMD (EA of course). It was a safety for my kid last year. 4.83W, 1570 SAT, lots of honors, ECs.
But, I agree generally that UMD is not a safety school. It just might fill that slot for some kids, though.
You might have considered UMD a safety, and it turned out OK because your child got in. My kid had similar stats this year, and got in, as we expected. But I wouldn't call it a safety school, even for our high stats kids. (And I think referring to UMD as a safety school is likely to lead astray other people whose kids may not get in, now or in the future.)
PP here. No one is calling it a "safety school " the question was about what safeties your kids were happy about -- for THEM. This was one for mine and a few others. In this case, safety is relative to the student, but not one person who identified it as a safety for their kid suggested it was a "safety school " overall. I even went so far as to say that I agree it is not a safety for most. So why try to pick a fight here? So annoying.
Umdcp is not a safety for anyone. Acceptance rate has to be higher than 50-60% to be a safety.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know kids who went to the following schools that were their safeties and they ended up really liking them:
Pitt
St. Olaf
Muhlenburg
And to the person who said some schools are not safeties...different kids have different safeties.
Nothing with an acceptance rate under 50% is a safety for anyone—does not matter their stats.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UMD a State flagship ranked #55 nationally is not considered a safety.
OP asked about what people considered. While it isn't a safety for most, it is for some. Let it go....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UMD-CP! My child (soph) loves it
? UMDCP is a safety for most kids? I know a few magnet kids in MCPS who didn't get in.
Not a safety. Anyone who lives in MD wants to go their b/c of the tuition. Highly selective just because of the number of applicants.
Safety is relative. And, if you have really high stats, you should be good at UMD (EA of course). It was a safety for my kid last year. 4.83W, 1570 SAT, lots of honors, ECs.
But, I agree generally that UMD is not a safety school. It just might fill that slot for some kids, though.
You might have considered UMD a safety, and it turned out OK because your child got in. My kid had similar stats this year, and got in, as we expected. But I wouldn't call it a safety school, even for our high stats kids. (And I think referring to UMD as a safety school is likely to lead astray other people whose kids may not get in, now or in the future.)
PP here. No one is calling it a "safety school " the question was about what safeties your kids were happy about -- for THEM. This was one for mine and a few others. In this case, safety is relative to the student, but not one person who identified it as a safety for their kid suggested it was a "safety school " overall. I even went so far as to say that I agree it is not a safety for most. So why try to pick a fight here? So annoying.
Anonymous wrote:If your child ends up having to attend their "safety" school, doesn't that by definition mean that it was in fact the most appropriate fit from the beginning?
Anonymous wrote:I know kids who went to the following schools that were their safeties and they ended up really liking them:
Pitt
St. Olaf
Muhlenburg
And to the person who said some schools are not safeties...different kids have different safeties.
Anonymous wrote:
OP asked about what people considered. While it isn't a safety for most, it is for some. Let it go....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Towson! My dd has loved it.
Can you tell me more? DD is looking very closely at going there (and I think it would be a good fit for her), but would love to hear any specifics about peoples' current/recent experiences.