Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:47
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
There is a post directly above yours that mentions APE that did not get deleted. Posts are getting deleted for that reason. They are getting deleted for making false statements.
This group, which a SB candidate led for years, was an open schools group in Arlington. They were abusive online and in school board meetings. Some of their most aggressive, vocal members were anti-maskers, anti-CRT, pro-voucher. They were aligned with open schools groups out in FCPS and LCPS. Including Ian Prior, PDE (Koch bro), etc.
This is really really really offensive. To say APE - which has an EXTREMELY public website and biweekly newsletter - is anti-CRT or pro-voucher or supported by Koch brothers or Ian Prior is complete lies. You shouldn't be allowed to defame like this on a public website. Show us ANY proof of anti-CRT or pro-voucher or supported by Koch or aligned with Ian Prior. Literally anything.
Here's an idea - some people thought kids should be in school sooner than you did, apparently. That doesn't make them bigots.
APE website: www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:45
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
There is a post directly above yours that mentions APE that did not get deleted. Posts are getting deleted for that reason. They are getting deleted for making false statements.
This group, which a SB candidate led for years, was an open schools group in Arlington. They were abusive online and in school board meetings. Some of their most aggressive, vocal members were anti-maskers, anti-CRT, pro-voucher. They were aligned with open schools groups out in FCPS and LCPS. Including Ian Prior, PDE (Koch bro), etc.
I really hope the normal lurkers on this page are not buying these defamatory lies. Literally none of this true. It'd be laughable if we we're living in an era of mis-information and conspiracy theory uptake. Please do your own research and look into this group, read their newsletters, and explore their website. I know some of them personally and they are all very active in their school communities and closely aligned with many APS teachers. There are a few deranged trolls on this page (likely the same people making the same outlandish claims on AEM) that are obsessed and continue to spread lies. They make accusation with no evidence or links. They associate people who have long been kicked out of APE if they went against their values and mission as being "leaders." It's disturbing.
Ok. Who was on the steering committee in 2021?
Who was MT’s campaign manager?
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:43
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
So you admit the criticism of VPMI actually had some merit, you just object to the exact timing.
No, they misrepresented VMPI.
Could you link the newsletter with the misrepresentation?
You can look up their newsletters. I believe they are on their website.
Early in the VMPI process, there were questions about whether VMPI would affect the availability of advanced/acceleration. VMPI clarified that they weren’t going to change that - schools districts could offer whatever courses and accelerate however they’d like. That wasn’t changing. That didn’t stop the GOP from running with the same talking points about VMPI threatening advanced math.
Several months later, right before the gubernatorial election, APE throws out the same talking points in one of their newsletters. “What about advanced math?!”
So, they weren’t paying attention and/or deliberately were pushing misinformation during an election. Recycling outdated GOP talking points isn’t a good look.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:32
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
There is a post directly above yours that mentions APE that did not get deleted. Posts are getting deleted for that reason. They are getting deleted for making false statements.
This group, which a SB candidate led for years, was an open schools group in Arlington. They were abusive online and in school board meetings. Some of their most aggressive, vocal members were anti-maskers, anti-CRT, pro-voucher. They were aligned with open schools groups out in FCPS and LCPS. Including Ian Prior, PDE (Koch bro), etc.
I really hope the normal lurkers on this page are not buying these defamatory lies. Literally none of this true. It'd be laughable if we we're living in an era of mis-information and conspiracy theory uptake. Please do your own research and look into this group, read their newsletters, and explore their website. I know some of them personally and they are all very active in their school communities and closely aligned with many APS teachers. There are a few deranged trolls on this page (likely the same people making the same outlandish claims on AEM) that are obsessed and continue to spread lies. They make accusation with no evidence or links. They associate people who have long been kicked out of APE if they went against their values and mission as being "leaders." It's disturbing.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:17
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
So you admit the criticism of VPMI actually had some merit, you just object to the exact timing.
No, they misrepresented VMPI.
Could you link the newsletter with the misrepresentation?
What is VMPI?
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:15
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
So you admit the criticism of VPMI actually had some merit, you just object to the exact timing.
No, they misrepresented VMPI.
Could you link the newsletter with the misrepresentation?
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:10
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
So you admit the criticism of VPMI actually had some merit, you just object to the exact timing.
No, they misrepresented VMPI.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:09
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
There is a post directly above yours that mentions APE that did not get deleted. Posts are getting deleted for that reason. They are getting deleted for making false statements.
This group, which a SB candidate led for years, was an open schools group in Arlington. They were abusive online and in school board meetings. Some of their most aggressive, vocal members were anti-maskers, anti-CRT, pro-voucher. They were aligned with open schools groups out in FCPS and LCPS. Including Ian Prior, PDE (Koch bro), etc.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:08
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
So you admit the criticism of VPMI actually had some merit, you just object to the exact timing.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:06
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:"Joyce and Showers' work landed on the long reading list that Maggie Slye drafted after being tapped to retool Washington's coaching program.
Slye, who has since become vice principal at Tubman Elementary School in the Columbia Heights neighborhood of the city, says that with Common Core coming, the District wanted to get more "bang for our buck."
In 2011, Slye devised the new coaching program around a few core principles she saw as essential to good teacher training: It should be provided by an expert who knows what good teaching looks like, it should be ongoing so that a teacher gets training multiple times, and it should be tailored to each teacher's needs.
While the specifics look different at every school, each coach typically works with eight to 10 teachers for six-week periods. The cycles start with a teacher and coach coming up with specific goals and plans. The coach then spends the next six weeks sitting in on the teacher's classes, discussing what worked and didn't work, and then helping the teacher plan his or her next lesson. How much one-on-one coaching a coach does varies greatly by school and teacher. In some cases, a coach is visiting a teacher's class multiple times a week, while in some schools, coaches are doing more group sessions with sets of teachers."
Sounds like the type of stuff we need at Central office admin, not SB.
jsteele
02/22/2023 14:04
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
There is a post directly above yours that mentions APE that did not get deleted. Posts are not getting deleted for that reason. They are getting deleted for making false statements.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:04
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Disagree. She will have great difficulty shaking the APE connection and turning the minds of the self-righteous, enlightened AEM folks. On the other hand, if they are really a quiet minority, based on her competition so far, maybe you're right.
This is something I'm going to need to think about. I was really, really turned off by the behavior of some APE members, especially on AEM. I've also been really turned off by the behavior os some members of AEM. I get skeptical of "bipartisan grass-roots" as a description b/c of astroturfing, but we DO need bipartisan action to fix our schools and our county. It's tough. I read the recent newsletter and I do agree with some aspects, like soft-discipline has hurt our schools. I worked in an elementary school for years and witnessed first-hand how lack of consequences led to escalating bad behaviors. Not teaching and enforcing limits fails kids and fails society. I don't think anyone who tries to woo the ACDC is ever going to say that. So, maybe I will vote for Miranda. That's something I never would have said in the past.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:03
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Exactly.
If you were actually reading their newsletters, you’d see it. On the surface, she’s a shiny D. But she has been with this group for years. That says plenty.
What newsletters? APE newsletters? Those consistently have the best information about APS. Here's the most recent one - real RWNJ stuff lol. This poster is seriously mental. https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/enews-february-21-2023
Yes, they frequently have inaccurate info and/or skewed interpretations.
They were also pushing the GOP lies around VMPI.
This has been discussed here and on AEM. Nothing new.
Could you post some specifics? VMPI was a hugely unpopular hot mess that started with the express goal of not doing any accelerated math until 11th grade, that’s why they backed off of the initial ambitions.
Right. And then after VMPI was off the table, APE was continuing to push (outdated) GOP talking points about it.
This was documented and discussed on DCUM and AEM.
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:02
Subject: Re:APS School Board race
Jeff/Admin: Can you explain why posts in this thread keep getting deleted if they mention APE?
Anonymous
02/22/2023 14:00
Subject: APS School Board race
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Just saw this? I feel like this is a plant. Anyway, can anyone confirm that this is a new campaign and not someone just stumbling upon her last campaign?
New! From the email that announced:
“Your support was crucial two years ago, and I'm asking for it again. I'm running for School Board in 2023 and I can't do it without you!
My priorities are simple:
Focusing on instruction that supports our students.
Prioritizing the resources to recruit, support, and retain our teachers.
Setting expectations that promote the best in all.
Providing oversight that asks tough questions on the budget and facilities.
Communicating with the community in a frequent, clear, and transparent way.”
I would never trust the judgment of someone who has been a leader in that group. Beyond all of their terrible behavior during the pandemic, they were still pushing GOP propaganda in 2022.
Arlington already rejected her once. Do it again.
Really?! is this what "GOP propaganda" look like:
from Miranda's website: "I’ve been an APS parent since 2015. I was a founding member of the Drew PTA in 2019 and still serve as Social Media Chair, am involved with the Montessori Public School of Arlington PTA, and serve as site liaison for the Drew/Green Valley Girls on the Run team. I’m a member of the Early Childhood Education Committee for the Advisory Council on Teaching & Learning. I volunteer as a Precinct Captain for the Arlington Democrats and spent time last fall knocking doors and poll greeting to elect local Democrats. I’m also a member of Green Valley Civic Association’s Executive Committee and our delegate to the Civic Federation.
In my professional life as a lawyer, I devote substantial time to volunteer pro bono work. I currently represent Planned Parenthood and litigate abortion rights in federal court, and I’ve mentored younger lawyers in housing rights cases and parole proceedings. "
She is a DINO. She's in it to win it, and has the race all locked up. She says the right Dem things while her base in her parent group will support her through the caucus and all the way to the election. She's very smary, savvy. It's not even a real race. She's going to run away with this.
Disagree. She will have great difficulty shaking the APE connection and turning the minds of the self-righteous, enlightened AEM folks. On the other hand, if they are really a quiet minority, based on her competition so far, maybe you're right.
Yes, she’s trying to rebrand. We get that.
Why did she align herself so closely with them?