Anonymous wrote:I’m not in your area, but for me to use bikes as a mode of transport I’d need dedicated bike lanes that are raised and fenced off from the road (ie much safer) ALL THE WAY. I’m not going to be safe for some of the way then play Russian roulette for the rest.
To use buses, I’d need to know they were safe and clean (no gangs, homeless or other crazies) and there would need to be “green roads and bridges” that only buses and bikes can use that significantly reduce travel time especially during rush hour.
I’ve lived in other places in the world that have these things and they really do work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I sweat profusely. Been that way all my life. I sweat at the drop of a hat even a teen and 20-something multi-sport athlete. Cultural norms and acceptance around sweat and resulting odor would have to change.
Also, speed limits on bike routes would have to be imposed and low enough to accommodate walkers and children.
Why do walkers and children need to be on bike routes?
Is this a serious question? Most off road bike trails are multi-use, meaning for pedestrians too. I mean the ones that go through parks or on the sides of roads separated by grass, not bike lanes within the roadway. And children bike places for transportation, too.
Yeah, those aren't really bike routes.With the "shared use" paths, the shared use is non-ideal for both pedestrians and bicyclists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone has summed up the very reasonable objections. No way any of these can be fixed
Yes, boomers and gen X'ers must keep polluting the planet relentlessly with their personal automobile addiction until they push daisies, because their hubris won't let them admit that the way they architected things led to the current toxic built environment and relentless global warming. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:The only places I ride bikes is a separate bike path. Otherwise I think it’s too dangerous.
This is how it is in Germany. They have red painted bike lanes next to the sidewalk, above the curb. Then you don't have to deal with cars riding next to you.
Anonymous wrote:Safe streets so I don't feel like I am taking my life into my hands to get a loaf of bread at BreadFurst, for example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone has summed up the very reasonable objections. No way any of these can be fixed
Yes, boomers and gen X'ers must keep polluting the planet relentlessly with their personal automobile addiction until they push daisies, because their hubris won't let them admit that the way they architected things led to the current toxic built environment and relentless global warming. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone has summed up the very reasonable objections. No way any of these can be fixed
Anonymous wrote:Well bully for you. I'm certain you maneuver around carefully and keep everyone else on the road safe... right? Right??That's fine with me. I drive a capacious, comfortable automobile with a great sound system and all kinds of bells and whistles. I actually enjoy my commuting time.
https://kmph.com/news/local/dangerous-blind-spots-in-trucks-and-suvs-cause-hundreds-of-child-deaths
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone has summed up the very reasonable objections. No way any of these can be fixed
Then expect to spend a lot more time in your car in the future.
Anonymous wrote:How about this: I will start cycling when you people shut up about it. Deal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but public transit has never been as close to as convenient as the car for me, whether it was living in Alexandria, Fairfax, Georgetown, or Baltimore. I don't have the time to waste to double or triple my travel time to use public transit, ignoring all the problems associated with it that I can deal with but would prefer not.
What happens when you can't find a parking space or you have to pay to park?