Anonymous wrote:This is a troll, right?
Anonymous wrote:While it makes sense to treat the BIL as an individual and for the OP to continue therapy to work through her earlier trauma, it makes equally perfect sense that she would feel the way she does about what she's learned--that is, to anyone who knows anything about dysfunctional life cycles and how they are perpetuated. People subconsciously gravitate towards what their brain patterns perceive as familiar and "comfortable," even if what's familiar and "comfortable" is objectively destructive. So for the OP, her sister's choice to marry and procreate with someone who has struggled with the same addiction their mother did epitomizes the old adage "out of the frying pan into the fire." Maybe it's true that the BIL has successfully remained sober for 15 years. But maybe it's not, and it is a fact that from a genetic standpoint, the sister and her husband deliberately chose to bring children into the world who are very much at risk of becoming addicts themselves. As someone who for different reasons spent much of her childhood having to accommodate dysfunction, I would never knowingly choose it for myself, nor would I put myself in a situation where I'd always be wondering when the other shoe would drop, so to speak.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
Here's the thing- we are all capable of anything under the right circumstances. That's part of being a human. Trust but verify. And it seems that your BIL is trustworthy.
15 years of successful sobriety isn’t enough for you? OMG.
Yes, I do. And I would 100% trust someone sober for 15 years.Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It's incredibly frustrating -- post after post, people point out that addiction is a real, legitimate reason for divorce, don't get involved with an addict, it's only a matter of time, once an addict, always an addict.
But this isn't a problem? I don't get it. Seriously.
I appreciate that I might be coming from an emotional standpoint somewhat and I'm not an expert and appreciate the insights and recommendations. I've gone to Al-anon and the message I received for years was RUN if you come across someone who is an addict. I think the saying was "don't collect broken toys."
I am worried about my sister. I am worried about my nieces and nephew. I'm not a terrible person. I'm care about my family and have gone through a lot.
I would 100% divorce if my hsuband was and addict and I would not personally marry an addict even with a long sober period. But I also would be totally comfortable if my sister chose to marry someone 5 years sober. I would not feel like he was going to relapse at any moment. I would hope that my sister was choosing a sober lifestyle as well — just sort of in solidarity with her hsuband. I would hope my sister and her hsuband would educate any kids on their genetic predisposition. But I would happily hang out with the guy.
Do you see the inconsistency, PP. I find it telling that everyone agrees that for themselves they would make the same decision as me and I'm right, but me being worried about my sister makes me a terrible person.
People avoid addicts. Even those "sober" ones are trouble, like this PP points out. If you found out your spouse admitted they had a problem with alcohol and were an addict (even if sober), you'd divorce them. So, I'm not wrong here. I find it hypocritical that everyone agrees that addicts are trouble (sober or not) but then bash me.
Make it make sense.
Same poster. It isn’t because I think someone sober for a long time is super risky. It is my own trauma that would make me not marry them. You are carrying over your trauma even further in a much more extreme way. I don’t think my position is right in not marrying the person. It is a limitation I know I have.
Anonymous wrote:I would think 'Damn good for that person, addiction is tough'.Anonymous wrote:How would you feel if you were told the reason why someone didn't drink was because they were an addict or alcoholic?
My BIL never drank for as long as I knew him but my sister in passing mentioned that he's been in AA for 15 years -- years before she even met him!? She willingly met and had kids with an addict.
The issue is that we were raised by an alcoholic. Our own mom drank until she died (an early death due to medical issues). It was never ending "I'll quit and go to AA" and then relapses. It was awful and I can't believe she got together with someone who is just this ticking time bomb.
I don't know why she hid this from me for nearly 10 years. I can't look at BIL the same and feel incredibly uncomfortable around him. I'm actually considering putting some distance between us and avoiding seeing them from now on but feel guilty. AITA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
You don't sound well. Truly.
See, I'm crazy. Fine. But the point stands, it's impossible to trust an addict. That's why people on DCUM are constantly saying addiction is a legitimate reason (sober or not) to divorce or cut someone out of your life. Because they are trouble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
Here's the thing- we are all capable of anything under the right circumstances. That's part of being a human. Trust but verify. And it seems that your BIL is trustworthy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
It's incredibly frustrating -- post after post, people point out that addiction is a real, legitimate reason for divorce, don't get involved with an addict, it's only a matter of time, once an addict, always an addict.
But this isn't a problem? I don't get it. Seriously.
I appreciate that I might be coming from an emotional standpoint somewhat and I'm not an expert and appreciate the insights and recommendations. I've gone to Al-anon and the message I received for years was RUN if you come across someone who is an addict. I think the saying was "don't collect broken toys."
I am worried about my sister. I am worried about my nieces and nephew. I'm not a terrible person. I'm care about my family and have gone through a lot.
I would 100% divorce if my hsuband was and addict and I would not personally marry an addict even with a long sober period. But I also would be totally comfortable if my sister chose to marry someone 5 years sober. I would not feel like he was going to relapse at any moment. I would hope that my sister was choosing a sober lifestyle as well — just sort of in solidarity with her hsuband. I would hope my sister and her hsuband would educate any kids on their genetic predisposition. But I would happily hang out with the guy.
Do you see the inconsistency, PP. I find it telling that everyone agrees that for themselves they would make the same decision as me and I'm right, but me being worried about my sister makes me a terrible person.
People avoid addicts. Even those "sober" ones are trouble, like this PP points out. If you found out your spouse admitted they had a problem with alcohol and were an addict (even if sober), you'd divorce them. So, I'm not wrong here. I find it hypocritical that everyone agrees that addicts are trouble (sober or not) but then bash me.
Make it make sense.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Here's what I want to know.
Does anyone truly believe an addict can be trustworthy? Be honest? Why? Where's the line? What do you need to see?
15 years of sobriety seems pretty good to me.