Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Oh good Lord. "Classical education" for the last 100 years has meant learning Latin, maybe Greek, and reading Ovid etc. in middle school. And that's how OP is correctly using the term "classical education." It doesn't have anything to do with pedagogy around how reading or math are taught.
You guys are arguing about two extreme fringes. Yes, there's a strain of thought that says that math is elitist and racist and kids shouldn't have to take math tests, but that's crazy talk that will lead to under preparing kids for the real world (hmmm, maybe that's the right-wing plot?). Similarly, associating Latin with fringe right-wingers is equally crazy, as evidenced by the fact that pp can't point to any area classics schools (Lutheran, Washington Latin PCS), or any classics schools around the country, that have actually been taken over by right wingers. Just because some wing-nut on Twitter says he favors a classic education doesn't mean these folks have any power, any power at all, at places like Washington Latin.
My friend, you’re thinking about “Classics”. Not the same thing.
OP wants the Classics--Latin and Greek. All these digressions into traditional/classical education are besides the point. No idea whether Milo wants Classics or Classical, but nobody cares because he's fringe and doesn't control any Classics or Classical schools.
I agree on Milo but you’re wrong about “classical education.” It is a full pedagogy, not “greek and latin classics.” To me what I really regret is the fact that current elementary education seems to be actually opposed to teaching kids content and memorizing, when they are so primed to do that in elementary. It seems like they jump ahead to teach kids “how to think” before they’ve even given them anything to think about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, y’all, something to know is that the sudden interest in “classical” education has nothing to do with great books or Latin. It traces back to a 2016 Identity Evropa (white nationalist group) “Don’t forget your heritage” campaign, which was tied to visuals of Greek and Roman sculpture and architecture. Folks like Milo Yiannipolous followed on; Milo even went by the handle @nero on Twitter. As well, these folks had a sudden interest in the Edward Gibbons book The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which was written in the 18th century. No, it’s not because a group suddenly became historically curious. Rather, they used Rome’s history to justify xenophobia and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
If OP is not aware of this, he/she now knows and can ask in more specific terms about the attributes his/her family wants in a school (small group seminars, reading the English canon, uniforms, whatever). If OP is aware of the loaded nature of “classical education,” then we should probably avoid normalizing and aiding this level of white supremacy.
I'm sure you are aware that classical education predates 2016 and Milo and social media. And has nothing to do with any of them.
I'm sure most people know that, but what may be news is that the term has been co-opted by the right-wingers whose goal is to eradicate public education (e.g., Hillsdale College's Classical Education charter schools)y. And they're winning! What we need to do is demand a classic education from our public schools without all the right-wing bullcrap.
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Look, sate education is always going to be around and anyone withe eyes to see can tell it’s a cesspool of woke tripe. That’s why classical schools are getting more attention, because they teach the basics of a liberal (a real liberal) education. Parents are craving this, and that’s a good thing.
LOL
"Before coming to Harvard, 63 percent of respondents attended public school, most of them non-charter, while 35 percent attended private school—26 percent non-denominational and 10 percent parochial."
All this proves is that Harvard likes woke tripe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, y’all, something to know is that the sudden interest in “classical” education has nothing to do with great books or Latin. It traces back to a 2016 Identity Evropa (white nationalist group) “Don’t forget your heritage” campaign, which was tied to visuals of Greek and Roman sculpture and architecture. Folks like Milo Yiannipolous followed on; Milo even went by the handle @nero on Twitter. As well, these folks had a sudden interest in the Edward Gibbons book The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which was written in the 18th century. No, it’s not because a group suddenly became historically curious. Rather, they used Rome’s history to justify xenophobia and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
If OP is not aware of this, he/she now knows and can ask in more specific terms about the attributes his/her family wants in a school (small group seminars, reading the English canon, uniforms, whatever). If OP is aware of the loaded nature of “classical education,” then we should probably avoid normalizing and aiding this level of white supremacy.
I'm sure you are aware that classical education predates 2016 and Milo and social media. And has nothing to do with any of them.
I'm sure most people know that, but what may be news is that the term has been co-opted by the right-wingers whose goal is to eradicate public education (e.g., Hillsdale College's Classical Education charter schools)y. And they're winning! What we need to do is demand a classic education from our public schools without all the right-wing bullcrap.
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Look, sate education is always going to be around and anyone withe eyes to see can tell it’s a cesspool of woke tripe. That’s why classical schools are getting more attention, because they teach the basics of a liberal (a real liberal) education. Parents are craving this, and that’s a good thing.
LOL
"Before coming to Harvard, 63 percent of respondents attended public school, most of them non-charter, while 35 percent attended private school—26 percent non-denominational and 10 percent parochial."
All this proves is that Harvard likes woke tripe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Oh good Lord. "Classical education" for the last 100 years has meant learning Latin, maybe Greek, and reading Ovid etc. in middle school. And that's how OP is correctly using the term "classical education." It doesn't have anything to do with pedagogy around how reading or math are taught.
You guys are arguing about two extreme fringes. Yes, there's a strain of thought that says that math is elitist and racist and kids shouldn't have to take math tests, but that's crazy talk that will lead to under preparing kids for the real world (hmmm, maybe that's the right-wing plot?). Similarly, associating Latin with fringe right-wingers is equally crazy, as evidenced by the fact that pp can't point to any area classics schools (Lutheran, Washington Latin PCS), or any classics schools around the country, that have actually been taken over by right wingers. Just because some wing-nut on Twitter says he favors a classic education doesn't mean these folks have any power, any power at all, at places like Washington Latin.
My friend, you’re thinking about “Classics”. Not the same thing.
OP wants the Classics--Latin and Greek. All these digressions into traditional/classical education are besides the point. No idea whether Milo wants Classics or Classical, but nobody cares because he's fringe and doesn't control any Classics or Classical schools.
I agree on Milo but you’re wrong about “classical education.” It is a full pedagogy, not “greek and latin classics.” To me what I really regret is the fact that current elementary education seems to be actually opposed to teaching kids content and memorizing, when they are so primed to do that in elementary. It seems like they jump ahead to teach kids “how to think” before they’ve even given them anything to think about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Oh good Lord. "Classical education" for the last 100 years has meant learning Latin, maybe Greek, and reading Ovid etc. in middle school. And that's how OP is correctly using the term "classical education." It doesn't have anything to do with pedagogy around how reading or math are taught.
You guys are arguing about two extreme fringes. Yes, there's a strain of thought that says that math is elitist and racist and kids shouldn't have to take math tests, but that's crazy talk that will lead to under preparing kids for the real world (hmmm, maybe that's the right-wing plot?). Similarly, associating Latin with fringe right-wingers is equally crazy, as evidenced by the fact that pp can't point to any area classics schools (Lutheran, Washington Latin PCS), or any classics schools around the country, that have actually been taken over by right wingers. Just because some wing-nut on Twitter says he favors a classic education doesn't mean these folks have any power, any power at all, at places like Washington Latin.
My friend, you’re thinking about “Classics”. Not the same thing.
OP wants the Classics--Latin and Greek. All these digressions into traditional/classical education are besides the point. No idea whether Milo wants Classics or Classical, but nobody cares because he's fringe and doesn't control any Classics or Classical schools.
Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Oh good Lord. "Classical education" for the last 100 years has meant learning Latin, maybe Greek, and reading Ovid etc. in middle school. And that's how OP is correctly using the term "classical education." It doesn't have anything to do with pedagogy around how reading or math are taught.
You guys are arguing about two extreme fringes. Yes, there's a strain of thought that says that math is elitist and racist and kids shouldn't have to take math tests, but that's crazy talk that will lead to under preparing kids for the real world (hmmm, maybe that's the right-wing plot?). Similarly, associating Latin with fringe right-wingers is equally crazy, as evidenced by the fact that pp can't point to any area classics schools (Lutheran, Washington Latin PCS), or any classics schools around the country, that have actually been taken over by right wingers. Just because some wing-nut on Twitter says he favors a classic education doesn't mean these folks have any power, any power at all, at places like Washington Latin.
My friend, you’re thinking about “Classics”. Not the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, y’all, something to know is that the sudden interest in “classical” education has nothing to do with great books or Latin. It traces back to a 2016 Identity Evropa (white nationalist group) “Don’t forget your heritage” campaign, which was tied to visuals of Greek and Roman sculpture and architecture. Folks like Milo Yiannipolous followed on; Milo even went by the handle @nero on Twitter. As well, these folks had a sudden interest in the Edward Gibbons book The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which was written in the 18th century. No, it’s not because a group suddenly became historically curious. Rather, they used Rome’s history to justify xenophobia and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
If OP is not aware of this, he/she now knows and can ask in more specific terms about the attributes his/her family wants in a school (small group seminars, reading the English canon, uniforms, whatever). If OP is aware of the loaded nature of “classical education,” then we should probably avoid normalizing and aiding this level of white supremacy.
I'm sure you are aware that classical education predates 2016 and Milo and social media. And has nothing to do with any of them.
I'm sure most people know that, but what may be news is that the term has been co-opted by the right-wingers whose goal is to eradicate public education (e.g., Hillsdale College's Classical Education charter schools)y. And they're winning! What we need to do is demand a classic education from our public schools without all the right-wing bullcrap.
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Look, sate education is always going to be around and anyone withe eyes to see can tell it’s a cesspool of woke tripe. That’s why classical schools are getting more attention, because they teach the basics of a liberal (a real liberal) education. Parents are craving this, and that’s a good thing.
LOL
"Before coming to Harvard, 63 percent of respondents attended public school, most of them non-charter, while 35 percent attended private school—26 percent non-denominational and 10 percent parochial."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
All you people caviling about now no one understands the meaning of a Classical education care to comment whether this is actually accurate?
Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, y’all, something to know is that the sudden interest in “classical” education has nothing to do with great books or Latin. It traces back to a 2016 Identity Evropa (white nationalist group) “Don’t forget your heritage” campaign, which was tied to visuals of Greek and Roman sculpture and architecture. Folks like Milo Yiannipolous followed on; Milo even went by the handle @nero on Twitter. As well, these folks had a sudden interest in the Edward Gibbons book The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which was written in the 18th century. No, it’s not because a group suddenly became historically curious. Rather, they used Rome’s history to justify xenophobia and anti-immigrant rhetoric.
If OP is not aware of this, he/she now knows and can ask in more specific terms about the attributes his/her family wants in a school (small group seminars, reading the English canon, uniforms, whatever). If OP is aware of the loaded nature of “classical education,” then we should probably avoid normalizing and aiding this level of white supremacy.
I'm sure you are aware that classical education predates 2016 and Milo and social media. And has nothing to do with any of them.
I'm sure most people know that, but what may be news is that the term has been co-opted by the right-wingers whose goal is to eradicate public education (e.g., Hillsdale College's Classical Education charter schools)y. And they're winning! What we need to do is demand a classic education from our public schools without all the right-wing bullcrap.
You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Look, sate education is always going to be around and anyone withe eyes to see can tell it’s a cesspool of woke tripe. That’s why classical schools are getting more attention, because they teach the basics of a liberal (a real liberal) education. Parents are craving this, and that’s a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If people don’t know what a classical education emphasizes in elementary school here are some examples:
Phonics is taught systematically using a curriculum. Students will read decodable texts instead of guessing and memorizing whole words while looking at picture cues. Workbooks to practice phonics skills are used.
Spelling is taught and there are weekly spelling tests. Instead of having students in kindergarten and first grade write sentences, paragraphs or pages of journal writing where they write using invented spelling about their favorite animal or what they did during the weekend, in classical education students first learn to copy correctly using correct spelling and punctuation. They memorize and recite poems.
In math students memorize math facts.
Oh good Lord. "Classical education" for the last 100 years has meant learning Latin, maybe Greek, and reading Ovid etc. in middle school. And that's how OP is correctly using the term "classical education." It doesn't have anything to do with pedagogy around how reading or math are taught.
You guys are arguing about two extreme fringes. Yes, there's a strain of thought that says that math is elitist and racist and kids shouldn't have to take math tests, but that's crazy talk that will lead to under preparing kids for the real world (hmmm, maybe that's the right-wing plot?). Similarly, associating Latin with fringe right-wingers is equally crazy, as evidenced by the fact that pp can't point to any area classics schools (Lutheran, Washington Latin PCS), or any classics schools around the country, that have actually been taken over by right wingers. Just because some wing-nut on Twitter says he favors a classic education doesn't mean these folks have any power, any power at all, at places like Washington Latin.