Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Here's a fun fact for you. The overwhelming majority of gun owners in the US are not concealed carry holders and have never been through any meaningful scrutiny before becoming gun owners. Got it?

And we can agree to have meaningful scrutiny of gun owners.
But as with the horrid evil Colorado shooter, many red flags were ignored by the police.
Same with VA Beach shooter.
Many of these folks should have had no access to guns using the existing laws which were ignored.
My point is you are trying to oversimplify a complex issue with your ridiculous and illogical emotional appeal argument.
It doesn't help the problem and appeals to only the simple-minded.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Here's a fun fact for you. The overwhelming majority of gun owners in the US are not concealed carry holders and have never been through any meaningful scrutiny before becoming gun owners. Got it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

You must be a troll ( or incredibly stupid).
Lets ban cars! Children die in automobile accidents right?
Here's a fun fact for you. Carry conceal holders are statistically speaking the most law abiding group in the country..
They also have had extensive criminal background checks done on them. Got it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

So it’s those positive reasons that make the dead kids worth it. Got it, thanks for clarifying!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Start with Strawman. You want to make the stupid repulsive argument that people who own guns approve of the murder of children. Which was done by a deranged person. Or that there is no other possible positive reason for gun ownership.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Explain what the logical fallacy is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Hey and you can lose 20-30 pounds by cutting your head off ! No dieting!
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

What, that’s the price of freedom. Are you not comfortable admitting it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Logical fallacy much?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He probably bought the gun at walmart. And yes obviously it was a 'he.'

Well this aged well!

Except Walmart does not sell hand guns. Don’t let facts get in your way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

+1 why can’t people accept dead kids as the price of freedom? The kids and Sandyhook and Ulvadi gave their lives so that we can buy semi-automotive rifles

Anonymous wrote:Republicans are heinous.

Full stop.

They voted against funds or "mental health"

The Fox prop crowd this is on you and your MAGA morons.

So roughly 1/2 the population is "heinous"?
Grow up.

Anonymous wrote:What if gun manufacturers were relegated to creating weapons strictly for LEO and the military? No more public sales. Cut off the supply chain.

Lol, good luck getting the votes for that. Right now, the most relevant federal exempts manufacturers from tort claims

What if gun manufacturers were relegated to creating weapons strictly for LEO and the military? No more public sales. Cut off the supply chain.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guarantee the gun was bought legally. bet he voted for Trump too.

It was probably bought at Walmart

So did this!