Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone tell me how the Amazon HQ2 deal is bad for Arlington?
Here are two areas that stick out for me:
National Landing itself is a poor naming choice for an established community (Crystal City). We have National Harbor not far away from the marketing perspective. This causes confusion.
Amazon is in the process of major layoffs. That means those who moved to work here are now jobless. That means evictions, that means empty units, that means a downturn in multiple related areas with housing feeling a large impact in a heavily packed area (Crystal City).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:II used to really like Falls Church but the overwhelming development there is going to be its demise.
2 mixed use projects and a whole foods on a two mile stretch of route 7 is overwhelming? LOL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Falls Church City will not necessarily decline, but it is changing a lot and I think the type of people who live there will change a lot in the next 20 years. It's becoming far too dense and people who moved there for the charming, little city feel, are likely to move away now that it's basically turning into Clarendon. We know a lot of empty nesters who are cashing out and moving away because they don't like the way the city is going.
So your basically saying FCC is growing and developing? The little City Feel only gets better with developments which = restaurants, small businesses, improved urban design, public spaces, local amenities, etc. Change is inevitable, and the change thats happening in FCC will definitely provide options for residents and will bring visitors from outside FCC into the little city to spend their money. The empty nesters who complain about this also complain about the high RE taxes, but they had no compaints when their kids were enrolled in FCCs top schools, and no complaints when they sell their homes for some of the highest price per sq ft in the area. But what they don't realize is development brings in more business/commercial revenue with which will help alleviate the RE tax burden on home owners. They would prefer a ghost town where everyone passes through without stopping so they can can pay less RE taxes?... doesn't make sense.
Anonymous wrote:This thread has mentioned every area of the DC metro. Maybe it’s really America as a whole that’s declining?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parts of DC that clawed their way toward gentrification but can escape the crime
Reston that feeds into South Lakes High School
Areas around Tysons Corner where Fairfax County wants to dump more affordable housing due to Silver Line extension.
This is a popular take, but crime is actually down in DC in 2022 relative to last year.
DC can be tough for families, but the region is still growing, and the fertility rate is still near all-time lows. The increase in the number of singles and DINKs alone is enough to keep DC out of any real spiral.
Crime reported to the police is down. That's more likely an indicator of police not responding or taking reports.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see how Kensington is declining. Building tons of houses in that neighborhood off Cedar I think it is
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New spin: for every neighborhood that you believe will spiral, list a corresponding neighborhood that will boom. Unless you think the DC MSA population is going to start trending downward for some reason it's a zero-sum game or better.
The areas near jobs will trend upward and the ones far from areas of economic growth will decline. I’d say Fairfax and Loudoun along 267 will continue to grow and Maryland suburbs will decline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone tell me how the Amazon HQ2 deal is bad for Arlington?
It’ll be a hellhole of transient renters. Most workers at Amazon don’t stay more than 2 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New spin: for every neighborhood that you believe will spiral, list a corresponding neighborhood that will boom. Unless you think the DC MSA population is going to start trending downward for some reason it's a zero-sum game or better.
The areas near jobs will trend upward and the ones far from areas of economic growth will decline. I’d say Fairfax and Loudoun along 267 will continue to grow and Maryland suburbs will decline.
Anonymous wrote:New spin: for every neighborhood that you believe will spiral, list a corresponding neighborhood that will boom. Unless you think the DC MSA population is going to start trending downward for some reason it's a zero-sum game or better.
Anonymous wrote:I have a lot of issues with the DC area generally, but a downward spiral? People have named just about every neighborhood and town. Yet property values and income are continually going up. I mean, if you are looking at Great Schools rating to argue that MoCo is tanking, then I don't know what to say to you. And McLean? Arlington? That's crazy.
People saying this must not have lived in any areas that have truly tanked. I think there is a far greater chance of Baltimore collapsing than anywhere in the DC area.
I think so much of the feelings here are from the constant drum beat of negative news in the press and, especially, on social media.
Anonymous wrote:New spin: for every neighborhood that you believe will spiral, list a corresponding neighborhood that will boom. Unless you think the DC MSA population is going to start trending downward for some reason it's a zero-sum game or better.
Anonymous wrote:New spin: for every neighborhood that you believe will spiral, list a corresponding neighborhood that will boom. Unless you think the DC MSA population is going to start trending downward for some reason it's a zero-sum game or better.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia seems like they just want to pave all the way to the West Virginia. It seems like no thought is being put into anything. Just pave and put up strip malls and cookie cutter developments with names like Riley's Hunt and Brecker Hills. Driving 66 is gross and feels like LA but with trees.