Anonymous wrote:You say he is likely to leave the house to his kids – means all of his children - his kids before you AND the kid you have together. I think this is how it should be, since you are not currently his wife.
For example, if he had 2 kids from a previous relationship and you and he have 1 kid together, then his estate should be divided into thirds, which is fair. Any other kids you have that are not his are not entitled to his inheritance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
Oh dear God, you really think that caring for their kid, her kids AND HIS KIDS is "barely work"?
You people are clueless.
They would have shelled out a fortune, maybe more than her salary if she were working anything other than a big deal job, if they'd had to pay for all the child care, a sitter to tote kids to activities, etc. etc. for these past seven years. Of course it made sense for her to stay home. JFC.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe she meant to say FINANCE instead of Fiancé....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
Oh dear God, you really think that caring for their kid, her kids AND HIS KIDS is "barely work"?
You people are clueless.
They would have shelled out a fortune, maybe more than her salary if she were working anything other than a big deal job, if they'd had to pay for all the child care, a sitter to tote kids to activities, etc. etc. for these past seven years. Of course it made sense for her to stay home. JFC.
Op here. Thanks for this. Was expecting that I would get bashed as a primarily stay at home mom but not this bad! Wow, if I worked, most of the money would have gone to child care. I appreciate the people who gave helpful advice! Thank you!
Anonymous wrote:You say he is likely to leave the house to his kids – means all of his children - his kids before you AND the kid you have together. I think this is how it should be, since you are not currently his wife.
For example, if he had 2 kids from a previous relationship and you and he have 1 kid together, then his estate should be divided into thirds, which is fair. Any other kids you have that are not his are not entitled to his inheritance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
They aren’t married. She has stayed home taking care of their joint child and has zero financial protection in return, since she would get nothing in a divorce or will. That’s a huge problem and yes, he is a jerk for putting her in this position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
Oh dear God, you really think that caring for their kid, her kids AND HIS KIDS is "barely work"?
You people are clueless.
They would have shelled out a fortune, maybe more than her salary if she were working anything other than a big deal job, if they'd had to pay for all the child care, a sitter to tote kids to activities, etc. etc. for these past seven years. Of course it made sense for her to stay home. JFC.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else get the feeling OP’s “fiancé” is still married to someone else? I can’t come up with any other reason they would be engaged this long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
Oh dear God, you really think that caring for their kid, her kids AND HIS KIDS is "barely work"?
You people are clueless.
They would have shelled out a fortune, maybe more than her salary if she were working anything other than a big deal job, if they'd had to pay for all the child care, a sitter to tote kids to activities, etc. etc. for these past seven years. Of course it made sense for her to stay home. JFC.
Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
They aren’t married. She has stayed home taking care of their joint child and has zero financial protection in return, since she would get nothing in a divorce or will. That’s a huge problem and yes, he is a jerk for putting her in this position.
agree, but she's also dumb for putting herself in this situation, for 7 flipping years.
If you are going to be a sahm, or only work PT, and you have a child, you had better have some form of financial security. If your DH is not providing that, then you need to get yourself a FT job that pays decently.
-signed a DW
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is everybody thinking the guy is a jerk? He seems sane… sounds like OP wants to sit on her butt, barely work, have this man take care of her, their kid, her kids, and be put on the house? Looks like OP has nothing in her name, no retirement and refused to work at the age of 50! Sounds like he put a ring on it and then realized her true colors…
They aren’t married. She has stayed home taking care of their joint child and has zero financial protection in return, since she would get nothing in a divorce or will. That’s a huge problem and yes, he is a jerk for putting her in this position.