Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DeSantis has the resume Biden wishes he had—extraordinary baseball player, Ivy League degrees, military service. But I still think Biden would win.
How does one say this nicely, DeSantis is weird. He’s uncomfortable in his own skin, zero charisma, comes across and mean and uptight. At least Trump could be entertaining (horrible person still). DeSantis will melt in the spotlight. I can’t wait to see Trump tear him apart then Uncle Joe will beat The Donald, again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
He will run against DeSantis, and will look terribly mumbly and senile.
Make no mistake, Trump is not getting the nomination after these midterms. It's going to be DeSantis, who speaks well and aggressively and doesn't say stupid things like Trump.
We need someone young and energetic who can out-debate a DeSantis.
(I like Joe the Grandpa, not Joe the President of the free world.)
For a second I thought I wrote this. My thoughts exactly.
Also, enough with abusing the word ageist. Ageist is passing up a competent sixty something for a promotion because of her age and refusal to get cosmetic surgery to look younger. Ageist should not include saying a man should not be president who is clearly going senile. If you have been down the road of having aging parents who refuse to retire and give up any sort of power or even give up the darn car keys as they are losing it and could cause harm to others, you know it is dangerous for him to get another 4 years. If he were a man in his 40s with signs of early dementia, I'd say the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:No one should be running for president at the age of 80.
Anonymous wrote:DeSantis has the resume Biden wishes he had—extraordinary baseball player, Ivy League degrees, military service. But I still think Biden would win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he is the nominee I will begrudgingly vote for him.
There needs to be an age limit on running for president. If there can be a rule requiring people to be 35 in order to be president, there should be a rule for when you're too old. That isn't ageist, it's common sense.
Oh please. He’s going to run, and he’ll probably win. People will vote for him because he is a safe bet, just like last time. Start think about who who You want after his second term.
Is "a safe bet" the best we can do?
Safe bet won in 2020.
Grand, you elected a senile mushroom who is easy to control. Well done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he is the nominee I will begrudgingly vote for him.
There needs to be an age limit on running for president. If there can be a rule requiring people to be 35 in order to be president, there should be a rule for when you're too old. That isn't ageist, it's common sense.
Oh please. He’s going to run, and he’ll probably win. People will vote for him because he is a safe bet, just like last time. Start think about who who You want after his second term.
Is "a safe bet" the best we can do?
Safe bet won in 2020.
Grand, you elected a senile mushroom who is easy to control. Well done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If he is the nominee I will begrudgingly vote for him.
There needs to be an age limit on running for president. If there can be a rule requiring people to be 35 in order to be president, there should be a rule for when you're too old. That isn't ageist, it's common sense.
Oh please. He’s going to run, and he’ll probably win. People will vote for him because he is a safe bet, just like last time. Start think about who who You want after his second term.
Is "a safe bet" the best we can do?
Safe bet won in 2020.
Anonymous wrote:You people need to wake up. Biden is a puppet who can only read (for the most part) what his handlers load into the teleprompter. You’re not voting for Biden, you’re voting for whomever his handlers are who pull the strings. Those people are praying that Biden remains sufficiently functional to trot him out in 2024.