Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:40
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Even country clubs are not allow to discriminate by law LOL
Sure. But country clubs are not required to admit people who ace the SAT ahead of charismatic, well-connected, socially adept people.
WTF you need to know race, and decide charismatic, well-connected, socially adept people by race??
WTF are you talking about???????
Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:39
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:I'm less concerned about letting in some URM kids who score lower than rich legacies (mostly white) who use money to buy their way in, a la the Trumps and Bushes.
If universities can let in whomever they want, then why can't they let in URM who may not score higher than a rich white kid?
Universities have been using legacies forever, including as a way to keep the "undesirables" out.
Fix that first. All it does it keep the privilege within a group of mostly rich white people.
-Asian American
Asians are hit the hardest and are not urm. Don't be stupid.
-asian american
Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:35
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Even country clubs are not allow to discriminate by law LOL
Sure. But country clubs are not required to admit people who ace the SAT ahead of charismatic, well-connected, socially adept people.
No they give required qualification criteria equally to every individual, and don't discrminate with race.
Imangine a country club saying "oh we already hae 30% Blacks. that's too many, so we are not accepting more Blacks at this time".
Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:26
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:I'm less concerned about letting in some URM kids who score lower than rich legacies (mostly white) who use money to buy their way in, a la the Trumps and Bushes.
If universities can let in whomever they want, then why can't they let in URM who may not score higher than a rich white kid?
Universities have been using legacies forever, including as a way to keep the "undesirables" out.
Fix that first. All it does it keep the privilege within a group of mostly rich white people.
-Asian American
Are you arguing for a university-level policy that might be adopted by a particular school? Sure, I agree, excellent policy.
Are you arguing that the Constitution requires every single college and university in America to adopt that policy? I don’t see it.
Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:20
Subject: Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
If this reversed, how will this affect legacy preference?
Anonymous
10/31/2022 08:16
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
I'm less concerned about letting in some URM kids who score lower than rich legacies (mostly white) who use money to buy their way in, a la the Trumps and Bushes.
If universities can let in whomever they want, then why can't they let in URM who may not score higher than a rich white kid?
Universities have been using legacies forever, including as a way to keep the "undesirables" out.
Fix that first. All it does it keep the privilege within a group of mostly rich white people.
-Asian American
If universities can let in whomever they want, then why can't they let in URM who may not score higher than a rich white kid?
Universities have been using legacies forever, including as a way to keep the "undesirables" out.
Fix that first. All it does it keep the privilege within a group of mostly rich white people.
-Asian American
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:50
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Even country clubs are not allow to discriminate by law LOL
Sure. But country clubs are not required to admit people who ace the SAT ahead of charismatic, well-connected, socially adept people.
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:43
Subject: Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kicks off in 2 hrs 40 mins, who is ready?
Where do I watch?
You can only listen. I think the link is on the SCOTUS website IIRC.
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:36
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Even country clubs are not allow to discriminate by law LOL
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:35
Subject: Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Kicks off in 2 hrs 40 mins, who is ready?
Where do I watch?
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:34
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Ok whatever they do, just don't do racism.
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:26
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Why not? The SAT is not in the Constitution.
Anonymous
10/31/2022 07:22
Subject: Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Kicks off in 2 hrs 40 mins, who is ready?
Anonymous
10/30/2022 19:11
Subject: Re:Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education shoud be mainly for acedemic merit and must be color blind.
Not really. It never was.
Not really what?? It should be for like country clubs??
Anonymous
10/30/2022 19:07
Subject: Race in college admissions is back in front of the Supreme Court Oral Argument on Oct. 31 (Monday)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My mom didn't go to any college and I didn't go to college in US, my daughter is underprivileged as a first generation applying to American colleges but she has to compete against students whose parents understand this system. She can beat them but being an Asian, she is in a limited quota group so less desirable than underachievers of other quota groups.
It is a fallacy that that there is a quota, and it is a fallacy that the kids who got into whatever school you are talking about are underachievers. They do not force rank admissions based on a single test, nor should they.
If no qouta, why use race in admission?
Who said single test??