Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The open casket wake is different than a viewing. When I was growing up it lasted for hours and ithere was food in one room and a bar in the room w/ the casket - like a cocktail party for the dead relative. It wasn't traumatizing but I remember sitting outside with my cousins on the steps of the funeral home waiting for it to end
“bar in the room with the casket,” makes perfect sense.
I think most could handle that.
Anonymous wrote:The open casket wake is different than a viewing. When I was growing up it lasted for hours and ithere was food in one room and a bar in the room w/ the casket - like a cocktail party for the dead relative. It wasn't traumatizing but I remember sitting outside with my cousins on the steps of the funeral home waiting for it to end
Anonymous wrote:I still shudder thinking of when I was made to look at my great grandmother in her casket as a child.
Anonymous wrote:I like Hindu funerals. You try and cremate the deceased before sundown on the day they die - usually.
Then you immerse their ashes and bones in a river. It is all final and over.
Of course, then many rituals and days of mourning and it is helpful to have relatives around and for the reality to sink in. My FIL died recently and having to go through the rituals, and not having a dead body around was like therapy.
Anonymous wrote:I'm Jewish and I don't get a lot of things Christians do with dead bodies. Embalming them, dressing them, viewing them, keeping them above ground for days. I might be hanging out in a hut with a giant ass lemon, but y'all are weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone heard of the new eco-trend where the body is dissolved in liquids?
It’s supposed to be better for the environment. Only allowed in some states though.
Okay, so THAT gives me the heebie jeebies. I am fine with open caskets. I am fine with burials. I am fine with cremation. I am fine with burial at sea.
Dissolving bodies in chemicals? Not so much.
Please don’t feel that way. Just read the BBC article.
It explains its better for the environment.
Don’t you want to protect the environment?
But it’s not better for the environment. It requires a significant amount of water, which is scarce in many areas, and then the waste water has to be treated. I have done the research in my work. Water cremation is NOT environmentally friendly, despite what the manufacturers of these machines and the few providers of this method want you to believe. And it is much more expensive than traditional cremation, as it requires more than 2-4x the time and significant, expensive regulatory compliance to ensure the waste water is treated properly. It is unlikely that we’ll see the wide-spread adoption of this method for these reasons.