Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The well of hatred for Ken Starr is narrow but deep. Kind of niche son of b but those of you who dislike him have strong reasons. It’s just an interesting difference from something like the Rush Limpbaugh thread in which apparently dozens or hundreds gleefully shared their repulsion over him.
I'm not sure what you're saying. Limbaugh was a much more public POS. Starr was a POS for sure, but not as many people were exposed to him.
The world is a better place with each of them dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The world is just a bit better with Ken Starr dead. Took a bit too long given he was the epitome of a bottom feeder with an agenda.
Says a lot about your life if this is what you celebrate.
Where were all you bootlickers yesterday when you had free rein of this thread?
I wonder how this 48-hour rule will play out when trump dies!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The world is just a bit better with Ken Starr dead. Took a bit too long given he was the epitome of a bottom feeder with an agenda.
Says a lot about your life if this is what you celebrate.
Where were all you bootlickers yesterday when you had free rein of this thread?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s important to differentiate between being pleasant and well-spoken, from being a worthwhile human being.
Republicans banked on good natured, gullible Americans confusing these two elements. And it works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The well of hatred for Ken Starr is narrow but deep. Kind of niche son of b but those of you who dislike him have strong reasons. It’s just an interesting difference from something like the Rush Limpbaugh thread in which apparently dozens or hundreds gleefully shared their repulsion over him.
I'm not sure what you're saying. Limbaugh was a much more public POS. Starr was a POS for sure, but not as many people were exposed to him.
The world is a better place with each of them dead.
Anonymous wrote:It’s important to differentiate between being pleasant and well-spoken, from being a worthwhile human being.
Anonymous wrote:It’s important to differentiate between being pleasant and well-spoken, from being a worthwhile human being.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn’t agree with any of KS’s political positions and the impeachment of Clinton was like a satire written by Oscar Wilde … however, I met him in real life and to be fair he was quite charming and spoke with nuance. I think he genuinely believed in the morality of his positions.
Sure, he had despicable character... but woohoo he was so charming! How American!
I said he was nuanced, something you seen to struggle with. I said I disagreed with all his positions but was surprised he was thoughtful in reaching decision I totally disagreed with - and pleasant.
It is not moral to defend sex predators.
Obviously….but I had the impression he viewed his positions as moral …