Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your blood work is good and all other parameters are good who cares. And no, if you are lean with lots of muscle mass you aren’t at a greater risk of all cause mortality compared to somebody overweight with low muscle mass who doesn’t move.
All in moderation. Do what you want. You only get so many trips around the sun. Some prefer to watch TV and not move. Others prefer to be more active. You do you.
No one is arguing be overweight and not move, but it's better for your health to be active and overweight than thinner and sedentary.
That’s true. But the group of people that are actually active in a way that matters for health and remain overweight is small. The group that is overweight and pretends to be active in a way that matters is large. The group of people that are overweight and don’t move at all is also large. The group that is skinny fat and sedentary is a rounding error unless they are on drugs or smoking a ton of cigarettes.
On what data are you basing this?
Being alive and actually paying attention in the US to people around you? New Year new me —> by March market flooded with barely used fitness equipment. Sales of garbage food remain unchanged. I have had great success buying high end used bikes from people my age that have all these lofty ambitions and never live up to them. Great for me-I’ll actually put the mileage on them.
Facts are hard. Wear a helmet. Most people who are overweight aren’t that healthy and they certainly aren’t moving in a way that makes any difference to their health. Especially those that sit at a desk all day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your blood work is good and all other parameters are good who cares. And no, if you are lean with lots of muscle mass you aren’t at a greater risk of all cause mortality compared to somebody overweight with low muscle mass who doesn’t move.
All in moderation. Do what you want. You only get so many trips around the sun. Some prefer to watch TV and not move. Others prefer to be more active. You do you.
No one is arguing be overweight and not move, but it's better for your health to be active and overweight than thinner and sedentary.
That’s true. But the group of people that are actually active in a way that matters for health and remain overweight is small. The group that is overweight and pretends to be active in a way that matters is large. The group of people that are overweight and don’t move at all is also large. The group that is skinny fat and sedentary is a rounding error unless they are on drugs or smoking a ton of cigarettes.
On what data are you basing this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your blood work is good and all other parameters are good who cares. And no, if you are lean with lots of muscle mass you aren’t at a greater risk of all cause mortality compared to somebody overweight with low muscle mass who doesn’t move.
All in moderation. Do what you want. You only get so many trips around the sun. Some prefer to watch TV and not move. Others prefer to be more active. You do you.
No one is arguing be overweight and not move, but it's better for your health to be active and overweight than thinner and sedentary.
That’s true. But the group of people that are actually active in a way that matters for health and remain overweight is small. The group that is overweight and pretends to be active in a way that matters is large. The group of people that are overweight and don’t move at all is also large. The group that is skinny fat and sedentary is a rounding error unless they are on drugs or smoking a ton of cigarettes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your blood work is good and all other parameters are good who cares. And no, if you are lean with lots of muscle mass you aren’t at a greater risk of all cause mortality compared to somebody overweight with low muscle mass who doesn’t move.
All in moderation. Do what you want. You only get so many trips around the sun. Some prefer to watch TV and not move. Others prefer to be more active. You do you.
No one is arguing be overweight and not move, but it's better for your health to be active and overweight than thinner and sedentary.
Anonymous wrote:I haven’t read all the comments. But I’m 52. I’ve lost 120lbs over the last 2 years and it really does age you. My only saving grace is that I’m African American and my face doesn’t show wrinkles but “I” think it looks a little gaunt (DH and friends say the opposite). So I agree with OP initial statement. I actually stopped trying to lose because other people who are not friends but just acquaintances were asking me if I was sick! I really wish I had my fat face back. I’m hoping to have a full tummy tuck, arm lift, and breast lift next year.
I also agree with the above poster regarding NOT doing the stop and start approach. If I had done that I would have never lost the weight I have. For most trying to seriously loose a lot of weight, you can’t stop mid battle.
Anonymous wrote:If your blood work is good and all other parameters are good who cares. And no, if you are lean with lots of muscle mass you aren’t at a greater risk of all cause mortality compared to somebody overweight with low muscle mass who doesn’t move.
All in moderation. Do what you want. You only get so many trips around the sun. Some prefer to watch TV and not move. Others prefer to be more active. You do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you're saying that if you stay fat, you'll stay looking younger? Don't overlook the fact that if you stay fat, you're also likely to die younger. People seem to have no trouble coming with the weirdest excuses for giving up on weight loss.
Not really. Obesity levels 2 and 3 are associated with early mortality compared to normal weight. Obesity level 1 has the same mortality rate as normal weight, and overweight has a lower association with with all-cause mortality.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4855514/#:~:text=Conclusions%20and%20Relevance,significantly%20lower%20all%2Dcause%20mortality.
Anonymous wrote:it has to do with how fast you lose the weight
Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed this trend for awhile among people I know. Most of these people are otherwise healthy people (a couple lost weight due to cancer and other disease). Those in their early 40s who now look to be in their mid-50s because they are so gaunt (eg, sunken cheeks). Is there anyway to avoid this from happening besides going back in time and not putting on weight to begin with?
Anonymous wrote:Guys!
If you are overweight and want to lose weight, DO IT!!!
No matter how old you are.
Who tf cares if you look older? You’re going to feel so good and the happiness is probably going to give you a youthful glow (not that it matters). And you’re definitely going to be more energetic.
Guess what, you’ll live longer and your insides will look young. 😉