Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I dunno. If I have a doctor, my relationship is with them, not the firm. I appreciate knowing where they land.
+1 That’s how it works for lawyers.
She should send out a letter to clients *before* she leaves, telling them where she is going.
Also, *her* clients, not the whole practice’s list.
There are ways to do this properly. Stealing data is not it.
It’s unethical for a partner in a business to send out info directing clients to another business while you’re still a partner at the first business. This is always done AFTER the move.
Also, if she was a partner (aka owner) she has every right to take client contact information. You people whining about this, don’t know anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a Nurse Practitioner. It is commonplace to have a contractual agreement that you will not contact patients when you leave a practice to pull them with you to the new one. It seems exceedingly odd that this would be done. Regardless of whether it was in a contract or not, it is unprofessional.
She was one of the original owners. Doubtful she had a standard non-compete.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Malone was never my favorite doc there, but many posters here seem unhinged. That might be a result of the tone and content of the Foxhall letter, but I have to wonder if there isn't racism involved as well.
Please tell us, how was the tone and content racist? It was a dry business letter.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a Nurse Practitioner. It is commonplace to have a contractual agreement that you will not contact patients when you leave a practice to pull them with you to the new one. It seems exceedingly odd that this would be done. Regardless of whether it was in a contract or not, it is unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a Nurse Practitioner. It is commonplace to have a contractual agreement that you will not contact patients when you leave a practice to pull them with you to the new one. It seems exceedingly odd that this would be done. Regardless of whether it was in a contract or not, it is unprofessional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Malone was never my favorite doc there, but many posters here seem unhinged. That might be a result of the tone and content of the Foxhall letter, but I have to wonder if there isn't racism involved as well.
No one, save for the “class action” poster has been “unhinged”- and that was someone who was probably trying to get people riled up. Have you ever been on DCUM other than this thread? This has been relatively thoughtful by comparison. I don’t care who the doc is (I got the letter) race/sex- I would think this is unethical and unprofessional behavior. Don’t even start with that.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Malone was never my favorite doc there, but many posters here seem unhinged. That might be a result of the tone and content of the Foxhall letter, but I have to wonder if there isn't racism involved as well.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Malone was never my favorite doc there, but many posters here seem unhinged. That might be a result of the tone and content of the Foxhall letter, but I have to wonder if there isn't racism involved as well.
Anonymous wrote:Regardless, Foxhall addressed the issue so they knew it was wrong and they had to address the issue. Also, the tweets were highly inappropriate and unprofessional - there are better ways to address the situation.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Malone was never my favorite doc there, but many posters here seem unhinged. That might be a result of the tone and content of the Foxhall letter, but I have to wonder if there isn't racism involved as well.