Anonymous wrote:Maybe they are busy doing actual work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m super confused why OP hasn’t asked the employee what’s going on. That seems like an obvious step.
Because OP is an ineffective manager. I think the employee is completely in the wrong here, but OP isn’t willing to do anything about and this is sending the message that this kind of behavior is acceptable.
Op here… we are withholding his raise. Also I was asking for advice on how to proceed beyond that as this JUST happened. Honestly, I’m inclined to do more than just withhold a raise (as stated in my OP) but everyone here seems to think I’m in the wrong for having things that are mandatory for our employees to do. Sooooo… this thread has told me I suck both because I’m overreacting and also underreacting
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m super confused why OP hasn’t asked the employee what’s going on. That seems like an obvious step.
Because OP is an ineffective manager. I think the employee is completely in the wrong here, but OP isn’t willing to do anything about and this is sending the message that this kind of behavior is acceptable.
Anonymous wrote:I’m super confused why OP hasn’t asked the employee what’s going on. That seems like an obvious step.
Anonymous wrote:Review processes are usually stacked against the employee and mainly are used as a tool of control, as well a documentation when the need for cost-cutting (through terminations) arises. Employee is essentially saying, you can rent me but you don’t own me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the person's manager ever do one-on-one's with them?
We are small, so their "manager" is the small leadership team ... ie: the group this person refusing to do a review with. We don't really have departments and all work together in varying capacities, so everyone's boss/manager is our small leadership team. We are all active in day to day management.
Well, that sounds like a PITA. It's Office Space "I have eight different bosses right now" territory. Designate one person to be the actual supervisor already.
As for the employee not filling out their self-assessment and goals: are you not able to review the employee's performance without them? I mean, do you honestly have no idea how well the employee is doing at their job if they don't tell you first? Or can you just, y'know, review the employee's performance?
+1. That may be nice for the management team, but it is miserable to have multiple bosses on the same level of the org chart all giving you work and reviewing your work.
+1 every time OP responds it’s clear s/he is the problem
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I get it. I have one I manage like this. For us it is mandatory too and I make it so painless that everyone except 1 does it. I don't require they write anything and I only need to take notes which don't even go to HR. They sit in a file on my computer unless needed and I have never needed them.
But this one for two years had refused to meet with me at all to do the review. Takes all of 30 minutes. The first year he didn't get his bonus (20k) and never even questioned why it didn't show up. This year he did it again so I distributed his bonus evenly between his coworkers who were all very happy. He finally asked me months later if he was getting a bonus and I told him when he does his review he can have it. Then I never heard about it again. We start reviews in the fall. Can't wait to see what he does.
Op here. Thanks for the commiseration. Do you know why this person does this? Curious if you have any insight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the person's manager ever do one-on-one's with them?
We are small, so their "manager" is the small leadership team ... ie: the group this person refusing to do a review with. We don't really have departments and all work together in varying capacities, so everyone's boss/manager is our small leadership team. We are all active in day to day management.
Well, that sounds like a PITA. It's Office Space "I have eight different bosses right now" territory. Designate one person to be the actual supervisor already.
As for the employee not filling out their self-assessment and goals: are you not able to review the employee's performance without them? I mean, do you honestly have no idea how well the employee is doing at their job if they don't tell you first? Or can you just, y'know, review the employee's performance?
+1. That may be nice for the management team, but it is miserable to have multiple bosses on the same level of the org chart all giving you work and reviewing your work.
Anonymous wrote:OP I get it. I have one I manage like this. For us it is mandatory too and I make it so painless that everyone except 1 does it. I don't require they write anything and I only need to take notes which don't even go to HR. They sit in a file on my computer unless needed and I have never needed them.
But this one for two years had refused to meet with me at all to do the review. Takes all of 30 minutes. The first year he didn't get his bonus (20k) and never even questioned why it didn't show up. This year he did it again so I distributed his bonus evenly between his coworkers who were all very happy. He finally asked me months later if he was getting a bonus and I told him when he does his review he can have it. Then I never heard about it again. We start reviews in the fall. Can't wait to see what he does.
Anonymous wrote:OP you should look for another job. Fines aren't always a big deal to companies and might not lead to investigations. Shady companies might fire you for not playing ball. I don't have any helpful advice since whistleblowing never works out in the employee's favor.