Anonymous wrote:Complaining about poor curriculum in your “private” school and it turns out to be some low-rent religious school = complaining you got bedbugs in Monte Carlo and it turns out you stayed in a crappy hostel
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is useless to generalize. I think you need to only compare the actual public and private schools you are considering.
My kid was in a “good” public middle school where DC was assigned three books total to read in all of DC’s three years there. DC didn’t write anything longer than two paragraphs the entire time. DC was supposedly in a top math class but barely tested into regular math in private high school. DC also reported kids were vaping in class when the teachers turned their backs. We moved the younger kids to private for middle school.
So in our case, no, the private school was far better. But that’s only the difference between the two schools my kids have experience with. I’m sure there are better public schools. I wish my kid could have attended one!
Yes, all of this. The question is really about your specific kids and your specific school options. I have quiet, well behaved girls who were generally ignored in our good public school but are drawn out in a smaller private all girls environment. I don’t think that all private schools are better than public or that I would choose this school for any girl, but I think we’re making the best choice for our particular kids at this time. I never bash our local public school either, I think it meets most of my neighbors needs well I just wanted something different for my girls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Complaining about poor curriculum in your “private” school and it turns out to be some low-rent religious school = complaining you got bedbugs in Monte Carlo and it turns out you stayed in a crappy hostel
We are enrolled in an expensive religious private school and it’s curriculum is disappointing. Some classes were better run public. Nor is it followed by all the classes. Paying for shine.
Anonymous wrote:It is useless to generalize. I think you need to only compare the actual public and private schools you are considering.
My kid was in a “good” public middle school where DC was assigned three books total to read in all of DC’s three years there. DC didn’t write anything longer than two paragraphs the entire time. DC was supposedly in a top math class but barely tested into regular math in private high school. DC also reported kids were vaping in class when the teachers turned their backs. We moved the younger kids to private for middle school.
So in our case, no, the private school was far better. But that’s only the difference between the two schools my kids have experience with. I’m sure there are better public schools. I wish my kid could have attended one!
Anonymous wrote:Complaining about poor curriculum in your “private” school and it turns out to be some low-rent religious school = complaining you got bedbugs in Monte Carlo and it turns out you stayed in a crappy hostel
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of the $40+ schools have more playtime, art, music, and science than public school, but likely does not have more math and reading instruction. That may or may not be valuable to you.
There are only so many hours in a day. If you want more art music and play, then that time has to come from somewhere.
In public school my kids spent a LOT of time waiting for teacher to help the rest of the class. Did homework. Read a novel a day. Doodled. Fine to give that up so the core 6 hrs are doing SOMETHING, and homework is for home.
And you think that doesn’t happen in private? The teacher should be helping the kids in class.
There are fewer kids and they are more closer to on level within the class. This is what my kid reports.
Same at my private but the academics are not as good. So going back to public where he will get a better education with more kids in class without the tuition.
No one goes to a religious school expecting the academics to be good
Like NCS? STA? I would add SFS but no one really believes it’s Quaker anymore.
No I mean schools that boast about their religious Bible-based curriculum
But that’s not what you said the first time. Revising your BS statement?
I guess I don’t consider NCS and STA to be religious schools. In the same way I don’t consider Georgetown to be a religious school.
So, yes, you are revising.
Is someone forcing you to send your kids to a religious school? No, didn’t think so. So what do you care what they do?
And you’re a bigot.
- not a religious school parent