Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
It’s not because masks have been removed. It’s because
- people are traveling
- people are going back to work
- large conferences are happening
- proms, dances and auctions
- other large events.
A lot has changed. Don’t attribute it all to masks.
Oh please. People were out and doing things, as well as traveling (even when they maybe should not have been), kids were playing sports (like mine). All in masks and transmission was low when they did this. We had not a single COVID case on my child's travel team for the entirety of Covid - UNTIL masks went away.
It is the masks. Or, I should say, the anti-maskers.
Sure. There were always people doing some things. But substantially more people are attending large events now. They are expected and required to. That’s the root cause. Not the masks. I mean most kids are still wearing them anyway. Get real.
Anonymous wrote:This area has been slow to move on. We are about a year behind the rest of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank god schools aren't listening to the covid crazies.
Absolutely these social events should be occurring. We have all moved on. No one cares how many people at a school have Covid. Welcome to the future.
This area has been slow to move on. We are about a year behind the rest of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Thank god schools aren't listening to the covid crazies.
Absolutely these social events should be occurring. We have all moved on. No one cares how many people at a school have Covid. Welcome to the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
It’s not because masks have been removed. It’s because
- people are traveling
- people are going back to work
- large conferences are happening
- proms, dances and auctions
- other large events.
A lot has changed. Don’t attribute it all to masks.
Oh please. People were out and doing things, as well as traveling (even when they maybe should not have been), kids were playing sports (like mine). All in masks and transmission was low when they did this. We had not a single COVID case on my child's travel team for the entirety of Covid - UNTIL masks went away.
It is the masks. Or, I should say, the anti-maskers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
It’s not because masks have been removed. It’s because
- people are traveling
- people are going back to work
- large conferences are happening
- proms, dances and auctions
- other large events.
A lot has changed. Don’t attribute it all to masks.
Oh please. People were out and doing things, as well as traveling (even when they maybe should not have been), kids were playing sports (like mine). All in masks and transmission was low when they did this. We had not a single COVID case on my child's travel team for the entirety of Covid - UNTIL masks went away.
It is the masks. Or, I should say, the anti-maskers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
It’s not because masks have been removed. It’s because
- people are traveling
- people are going back to work
- large conferences are happening
- proms, dances and auctions
- other large events.
A lot has changed. Don’t attribute it all to masks.
Oh please. People were out and doing things, as well as traveling (even when they maybe should not have been), kids were playing sports (like mine). All in masks and transmission was low when they did this. We had not a single COVID case on my child's travel team for the entirety of Covid - UNTIL masks went away.
It is the masks. Or, I should say, the anti-maskers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
It’s not because masks have been removed. It’s because
- people are traveling
- people are going back to work
- large conferences are happening
- proms, dances and auctions
- other large events.
A lot has changed. Don’t attribute it all to masks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish chap Peterson hadn’t made a state law that prevents districts from reinstating mask mandates. It was such a stupid law. We knew we would have additional surges and the state made an important strategy unavailable.
A mask isn’t stopping this.
+1
You people are so against masks. Rates were not this high in schools when masks were required.
Anonymous wrote:My kids' ES held a superspreader event last night. I guarantee we'll see an uptick in cases in the next two weeks. Hopefully this surge will be over before school ends so we can go on vacation in peace!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids' ES held a superspreader event last night. I guarantee we'll see an uptick in cases in the next two weeks. Hopefully this surge will be over before school ends so we can go on vacation in peace!
Bingo night?
Lol. We must go to the same school. Astounded they held this event indoors with this surge!!! I didn’t let my kid go.
They are indoors all day for school. What difference is Bingo?
No difference. Same with prom. Why is no one crying foul about that? I am personally glad Bingo night has been happening at various schools. It’s a glimmer of normalcy for our kiddos. There is no need to be “astounded” lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids' ES held a superspreader event last night. I guarantee we'll see an uptick in cases in the next two weeks. Hopefully this surge will be over before school ends so we can go on vacation in peace!
Bingo night?
Lol. We must go to the same school. Astounded they held this event indoors with this surge!!! I didn’t let my kid go.
They are indoors all day for school. What difference is Bingo?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids' ES held a superspreader event last night. I guarantee we'll see an uptick in cases in the next two weeks. Hopefully this surge will be over before school ends so we can go on vacation in peace!
Bingo night?
Lol. We must go to the same school. Astounded they held this event indoors with this surge!!! I didn’t let my kid go.
They are indoors all day for school. What difference is Bingo?