Anonymous wrote:I’m aware that this is a touchy subject. I know there’s also debate over whether teachers should be getting subject matter degrees then specializing in education in a master’s program, versus majoring in education as an undergraduate. My opinion is that that would need to take into account credential inflation and that students would need to pay more to become teachers than they previously needed to. Currently, universities that were historically and continue to ones that produce teachers have low average SAT scores, graduation rates and other factors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One way that top students can be steered into public school teaching is through Teach for America. It's how one of my kids -- an honors graduate of a top 10 liberal arts college -- entered the field. While many TFA alums move on to other things, some don't -- including my kid and several others who I know well.
In the case of my kid, though, she was able to stay in the profession notwithstanding the relatively low pay because (1) she had no student loans and (2) her husband -- a graduate of the same college but with a less impressive college transcript -- went into private industry and almost immediately began making more money than her.
Teach for America really devalues the importance of training to creating effective teachers. I am sure your daughter and her friends have the best of intentions, but you don't learn to teach by going through a a brief course the summer before you're plunked into a classroom. And most of the TFA alumni I know didn't go back to learn how to teach. Some of them went to get MEds so they could go into administration, because those who can't do administrate.
Which gets to one of the main things that drive people from the profession: Being overseen and evaluated by things that don't reflect your ability by people who don't understand your job. That, and the low pay, are going to drain the pool of talent faster than anything else.
Teach for America teachers are college graduates who are required to enroll in graduate school to get a master's in teaching at the same time that they are "plunked into a classroom." You left a critical part of the program out when you were disparaging it. How much "training" does your typical college graduate with a bachelor's in teaching have before they're "plunked" into a classroom?
I had three 6 month long placements in three different classrooms as an undergrad. My TFA colleague had never been around kids prior to her first teaching gig. Big difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One way that top students can be steered into public school teaching is through Teach for America. It's how one of my kids -- an honors graduate of a top 10 liberal arts college -- entered the field. While many TFA alums move on to other things, some don't -- including my kid and several others who I know well.
In the case of my kid, though, she was able to stay in the profession notwithstanding the relatively low pay because (1) she had no student loans and (2) her husband -- a graduate of the same college but with a less impressive college transcript -- went into private industry and almost immediately began making more money than her.
Teach for America really devalues the importance of training to creating effective teachers. I am sure your daughter and her friends have the best of intentions, but you don't learn to teach by going through a a brief course the summer before you're plunked into a classroom. And most of the TFA alumni I know didn't go back to learn how to teach. Some of them went to get MEds so they could go into administration, because those who can't do administrate.
Which gets to one of the main things that drive people from the profession: Being overseen and evaluated by things that don't reflect your ability by people who don't understand your job. That, and the low pay, are going to drain the pool of talent faster than anything else.
Teach for America teachers are college graduates who are required to enroll in graduate school to get a master's in teaching at the same time that they are "plunked into a classroom." You left a critical part of the program out when you were disparaging it. How much "training" does your typical college graduate with a bachelor's in teaching have before they're "plunked" into a classroom?
Anonymous wrote:Is TFA even still around? The majority could not cut it as above posts state. Most lacked cultural competencies to work in the communities that they did. Think how little we think of poor children that we gave them completely unqualified teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One way that top students can be steered into public school teaching is through Teach for America. It's how one of my kids -- an honors graduate of a top 10 liberal arts college -- entered the field. While many TFA alums move on to other things, some don't -- including my kid and several others who I know well.
In the case of my kid, though, she was able to stay in the profession notwithstanding the relatively low pay because (1) she had no student loans and (2) her husband -- a graduate of the same college but with a less impressive college transcript -- went into private industry and almost immediately began making more money than her.
Teach for America really devalues the importance of training to creating effective teachers. I am sure your daughter and her friends have the best of intentions, but you don't learn to teach by going through a a brief course the summer before you're plunked into a classroom. And most of the TFA alumni I know didn't go back to learn how to teach. Some of them went to get MEds so they could go into administration, because those who can't do administrate.
Which gets to one of the main things that drive people from the profession: Being overseen and evaluated by things that don't reflect your ability by people who don't understand your job. That, and the low pay, are going to drain the pool of talent faster than anything else.
Teach for America teachers are college graduates who are required to enroll in graduate school to get a master's in teaching at the same time that they are "plunked into a classroom." You left a critical part of the program out when you were disparaging it. How much "training" does your typical college graduate with a bachelor's in teaching have before they're "plunked" into a classroom?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One way that top students can be steered into public school teaching is through Teach for America. It's how one of my kids -- an honors graduate of a top 10 liberal arts college -- entered the field. While many TFA alums move on to other things, some don't -- including my kid and several others who I know well.
In the case of my kid, though, she was able to stay in the profession notwithstanding the relatively low pay because (1) she had no student loans and (2) her husband -- a graduate of the same college but with a less impressive college transcript -- went into private industry and almost immediately began making more money than her.
Teach for America really devalues the importance of training to creating effective teachers. I am sure your daughter and her friends have the best of intentions, but you don't learn to teach by going through a a brief course the summer before you're plunked into a classroom. And most of the TFA alumni I know didn't go back to learn how to teach. Some of them went to get MEds so they could go into administration, because those who can't do administrate.
Which gets to one of the main things that drive people from the profession: Being overseen and evaluated by things that don't reflect your ability by people who don't understand your job. That, and the low pay, are going to drain the pool of talent faster than anything else.
TFA is the epitome of white saviorism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One way that top students can be steered into public school teaching is through Teach for America. It's how one of my kids -- an honors graduate of a top 10 liberal arts college -- entered the field. While many TFA alums move on to other things, some don't -- including my kid and several others who I know well.
In the case of my kid, though, she was able to stay in the profession notwithstanding the relatively low pay because (1) she had no student loans and (2) her husband -- a graduate of the same college but with a less impressive college transcript -- went into private industry and almost immediately began making more money than her.
Teach for America really devalues the importance of training to creating effective teachers. I am sure your daughter and her friends have the best of intentions, but you don't learn to teach by going through a a brief course the summer before you're plunked into a classroom. And most of the TFA alumni I know didn't go back to learn how to teach. Some of them went to get MEds so they could go into administration, because those who can't do administrate.
Which gets to one of the main things that drive people from the profession: Being overseen and evaluated by things that don't reflect your ability by people who don't understand your job. That, and the low pay, are going to drain the pool of talent faster than anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm an elementary school teacher. You aren't going to get these people into education unless a lot of changes are made first. Here are a few:
1) Pay them what they would be paid if they chose another profession. I'm in year 15 of teaching. I have a Master's plus I don't know how many more credits. My DS just graduated from college last year and already makes more than I do (and he isn't in engineering or CS).
2) Pay for their undergrad degree or highly subsidize it.
3) Get rid of the higher-ups in education who haven't taught for at least 10 yrs prior to moving into admin. Basically, the people making the big decisions need to be a lot more in touch with teaching.
4) Enforce rules with consequences. Make it no-nonsense like my son's former Catholic school.
True, just because some can test well on the SAT and have a high GPA doesn't mean that person has good communication and people management skills.
I agree. Becoming an admin is way too easy. You should be required to teach at least 10 years before becoming an admin.
I'm the teacher who posted above. In many countries, the principal or head of school is called a lead teacher because they actually still teach while having admin duties. Also, I want to add that the best teachers I have worked with aren't necessarily the smartest. We have had many, many, many TFA people at our school over the years. The colleges they attended are very impressive however they quit way before the first school year ended. They couldn't deal with classroom management and the workload. Top grades and test scores don't mean much when you can't teach your students because you can't manage them.
Anonymous wrote:Standardized curriculum, standardized textbooks, standardized syllabus. Aides in each classroom. Teachers should not be responsible for classroom discipline. Aides and administrators need to handle discipline.
Standardized assignments, tests should be sent home after grading, parental involvement should be a must. Countywide or statewide final exams after each semester.
Extend the school year slightly, with breaks between each quarter.
Teachers need to be paid more and should have the right to remove 10% of disruptive students from their classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Standardized curriculum, standardized textbooks, standardized syllabus. Aides in each classroom. Teachers should not be responsible for classroom discipline. Aides and administrators need to handle discipline.
Standardized assignments, tests should be sent home after grading, parental involvement should be a must. Countywide or statewide final exams after each semester.
Extend the school year slightly, with breaks between each quarter.
Teachers need to be paid more and should have the right to remove 10% of disruptive students from their classroom.
I'm not sure why you think standardization would make teaching a more appealing career. The teachers I know want more autonomy
Anonymous wrote:Standardized curriculum, standardized textbooks, standardized syllabus. Aides in each classroom. Teachers should not be responsible for classroom discipline. Aides and administrators need to handle discipline.
Standardized assignments, tests should be sent home after grading, parental involvement should be a must. Countywide or statewide final exams after each semester.
Extend the school year slightly, with breaks between each quarter.
Teachers need to be paid more and should have the right to remove 10% of disruptive students from their classroom.