Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are kids even applying to SLACS then?
Colgate had something like 22000 applicants this year. A few years ago it was 9000.
Why are kids applying to 10+ schools period? They are casting a wide net.
There are plenty of large universities to cast a wide net without applying to SLACS. So why are kids still applying to SLACS?
If you asked my DC who just applied to 20 schools all over the map he would say:
For variety
For fun
Because I can
Maybe he does not understand the point of the process. Or does not know himself?
The "point of the process," one is led to believe, it to find a school, or group of schools, that will admit a student, and then pick one. It's not that complicated. He's not getting into Harvard, but also think that he can excel at a school beyond community college.
What 17-year-old boy really knows himself?
My response to you, and to PP who states that he still has time to pick up wisdom - is to say -- the system is set up for this. Once a student has slaved over a common app, what problem is it to push a button for a few more submits, especially when there is no application fee, as there is in a large number of these schools, both state universities and SLACs? Oh sure, he had to write a few more supplement essays, but those are largely cut and paste projects as well.
And voila - before he knows it, student ends up with applications submitted to 20 different schools - SLACs, large universities, smaller colleges - whatever you want. My DC ended up with a nice choice to pick from.
Creating more work for other people, applying to schools he’a not really interested in, would never really consider going to, and possibly taking away slots that one of his classmates might have received. I’m sure you don’t see it that way, you are teaching him that his own self is the most important thing, but not all of us have that worldview.
You’re absolutely right. I don’t see it that way at all.
As expected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
And before someone chimes in with “it’s worth it because rich people are willing to pay it or because anybody is willing to,” there’s an unlimited flow of student parent loans propping up the price.
We were happy to be full pay to support DC’s decision to ED at his first choice NESCAC. That investment paid off in a remarkable four year journey and a six figure job at a FAANG. I suppose it all comes down to whether one can afford the investment and the value one places on education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could it be that you just happen to know kids raised in a city? I know that my city-raised Junior can’t fathom spending 4 years locked in a small town. Concerned the social life would revolve exclusively around alcohol and there just wouldn’t be enough off campus restaurants and activities to them happy for 4 years. Feels like a step backwards for a teen who has enjoyed exploring the city they live in. I do see much less interest in alcohol from Gen Z as compared to Gen X.
Completely agree. Our DD was accepted to schools in areas she considered “too remote” (ie Syracuse, Wake Forest, Vassar.) Interesting that she and a number of her friends who were raised in the DC area prefer to be in a city/close proximity to a major city for college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
And before someone chimes in with “it’s worth it because rich people are willing to pay it or because anybody is willing to,” there’s an unlimited flow of student parent loans propping up the price.
Anonymous wrote:Could it be that you just happen to know kids raised in a city? I know that my city-raised Junior can’t fathom spending 4 years locked in a small town. Concerned the social life would revolve exclusively around alcohol and there just wouldn’t be enough off campus restaurants and activities to them happy for 4 years. Feels like a step backwards for a teen who has enjoyed exploring the city they live in. I do see much less interest in alcohol from Gen Z as compared to Gen X.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
And before someone chimes in with “it’s worth it because rich people are willing to pay it or because anybody is willing to,” there’s an unlimited flow of student parent loans propping up the price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
And before someone chimes in with “it’s worth it because rich people are willing to pay it or because anybody is willing to,” there’s an unlimited flow of student parent loans propping up the price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
I don't think any school, LAC or big U is worth $83k. But plenty of good schools offer merit aid so that the sticker price is meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:SLACs are going hit as high as 83K a year. My iwn is not worth it. My kids weren’t even interested and I didn’t see the value in it anymore
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This isn't a recent trend by any means. People regularly turn down even the very top LACs (Williams and Amherst) for universities ranked around ~15, ~20.
LOL
What percentage of high school kids get into both top LACs and T15-20 universities? You're talking about a bubble.
Uh I can think of more than a handful in just this past cycle alone. Clearly the OP can as well.
Yes, you live in a bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Can we just acknowledge that not all LACS or SLACS are rural and that not all big stage schools are urban?
Thank you.