Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Yikes! Well, at least they got their father-daughter dance. Must “return to normal” at all costs…even if it means no classes when there are outbreaks. Let’s just keep pretending the pandemic is over.
The priorities seem really out of whack if the school puts a social gathering over learning. Unless of course the school regrets having this event (which I hope is the case).
History says otherwise. People generally are at the point where they think they can outsmart the virus by minimizing it, pretending it doesn’t exist, and prioritizing some romanticized version of “normalcy.”
The virus is no longer a threat of overburdening hospitals or deaths. Therefore it is time to move on. This was the plan from day 1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Yikes! Well, at least they got their father-daughter dance. Must “return to normal” at all costs…even if it means no classes when there are outbreaks. Let’s just keep pretending the pandemic is over.
The priorities seem really out of whack if the school puts a social gathering over learning. Unless of course the school regrets having this event (which I hope is the case).
History says otherwise. People generally are at the point where they think they can outsmart the virus by minimizing it, pretending it doesn’t exist, and prioritizing some romanticized version of “normalcy.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Yikes! Well, at least they got their father-daughter dance. Must “return to normal” at all costs…even if it means no classes when there are outbreaks. Let’s just keep pretending the pandemic is over.
The priorities seem really out of whack if the school puts a social gathering over learning. Unless of course the school regrets having this event (which I hope is the case).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Yikes! Well, at least they got their father-daughter dance. Must “return to normal” at all costs…even if it means no classes when there are outbreaks. Let’s just keep pretending the pandemic is over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Anonymous wrote:The virus is here to stay. I don’t like it either, but we need to continue with life.
Anonymous wrote:Its not just DC Private schools nor is it just DC
There is a huge nationwide outbreak that .... it just seems the decision has been made to ignore and not talk or even write about, just pretend the pandemic is over and everyone stop wearing masks, etc...
The Mayor of NYC, for example, wasn't onsite yesterday after the mass shooting in the NYC Subway because he has Covid
college campuses are experiencing mass waves of covid since March
we have families on both coasts and Covid is running rampant on both coasts, but the NYT is just not reporting cases
I have never seen a public policy to just move on so consistently carried out for better or for worse, we will see
My guess is the economy simply cannot handle the down turn any longer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
28 cases (https://coronavirus.maryland.gov/pages/school-resources) has got to be more that limited to only a few classes. That's more than 10% of their student body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
+1. Do they know how it was spread?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
This was exactly my suspicion! Why would they close the entire school when it is limited to only a few classes. So disruptive for families.
Anonymous wrote:Every class is not receiving virtual learning and if so, it's limited. This is basically an extended break for teachers and children. A sprinkling of virtual is a weak substitute
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the next wave is here. It's going to be an ugly end to the school year.
I have this fear as well.
I have a kid graduating this year and I feel like it'll be 2020 all over again where my kid who graduated that year didn't get a ceremony.