Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imbalanced admissions results are a bad look for colleges.
The colleges are the ones picking who they want. It's balanced for them. What you deem as "imbalanced" doesn't matter.
Not if they’re taking fed $$$
Anonymous wrote:Think my neighbor lied about ethnicity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imbalanced admissions results are a bad look for colleges.
The colleges are the ones picking who they want. It's balanced for them. What you deem as "imbalanced" doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think my neighbor lied about ethnicity.
Report her anonymously. Colleges welcome such information. They can be thrown out for lying on their application. Colleges rather find out now, than wait until that student commits worse - which they will.
Anonymous wrote:Just here to say my child applied to 12 schools last year. Went to her "11th" choice. Total misery this time last spring. Now says it's the best thing that ever happened to her. She has a 4.0 and could have transferred out, but had no interest in doing so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am realistic. One kid we know, who was very similar to mine except from a rich family and elite private, got into a more highly ranked school. I Know it was in part due to their full pay status. Still, I only wanted each of our kids to be happy. Mine, as it turns out, adjusted better than the other kid...which made me sad for her family (not secretly happy or anything).
These are adolescents, older children in effect. How could you wish them anything but success?
I sense schadenfreude here, and often, on DCUM.
Maybe the kid is more qualified, or maybe that kid fit the "slot" (that the school wanted/needed) better than you kid, and that is okay.
Full pay is something - EXCEPT if the kid does not have the grades or the fit, then full pay is nothing.
Except the poster literally said she felt bad for the other family…so there is no reason to infer that she was secretly happy about their misfortune.
Perhaps you are projecting, or using the word incorrectly?
Not projecting - except that I know how some parents talk about the successful kids, and rarely are those parents accurate.
This kid has had serious mental health issues in college. I have known her since she was born. There is zero joy in watching her decline.
Success is really not all about USNWR rankings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am realistic. One kid we know, who was very similar to mine except from a rich family and elite private, got into a more highly ranked school. I Know it was in part due to their full pay status. Still, I only wanted each of our kids to be happy. Mine, as it turns out, adjusted better than the other kid...which made me sad for her family (not secretly happy or anything).
These are adolescents, older children in effect. How could you wish them anything but success?
I sense schadenfreude here, and often, on DCUM.
Maybe the kid is more qualified, or maybe that kid fit the "slot" (that the school wanted/needed) better than you kid, and that is okay.
Full pay is something - EXCEPT if the kid does not have the grades or the fit, then full pay is nothing.
Except the poster literally said she felt bad for the other family…so there is no reason to infer that she was secretly happy about their misfortune.
Perhaps you are projecting, or using the word incorrectly?
Not projecting - except that I know how some parents talk about the successful kids, and rarely are those parents accurate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think my neighbor lied about ethnicity.
Report her anonymously. Colleges welcome such information. They can be thrown out for lying on their application. Colleges rather find out now, than wait until that student commits worse - which they will.
Anonymous wrote:Imbalanced admissions results are a bad look for colleges.