Cotton is awful, he is not even bothering to ask real questions, just idiotic bites for FoxNews "do you think we should catch all murders instead of the 40% we catch?" I am not sure how this is relevant for a SC justice. does he think that Alito wears his batman cape at night and roams Washignton DC looking for criminals

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blackburn herself is also a very recent beneficiary of affirmative action, since she’s only on the Senate Judiciary Committee because everyone complained so loudly about it not having any women on the Republican side.

She is as dumb as an F'ing brick.

Tennessean here. She's an embarrassment to our state. But then again the entire state is embarrassing.

Then get the hell out of TN. Seriously.

Anonymous wrote:Senator Hirano just won this hearing.

Can you summarize for those of us who have not been able to watch?

Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see a non-lawyer on the court eventually, and if not, definitely not someone from an Ivy.

Amy didn’t go to an Ivy.

A United States Senator, Braun, said the U.S. Supreme Court shouldn't have legalized interracial marriage nationally, that it should have been up to individual states.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I noticed that this thread is just on page 3 on day 2 of the hearings. Compared to the multiple 250-page threads per day circus for Kavanaugh. Thank goodness for a decent candidate.

Yes, I’m glad Republicans aren’t putting Kentaji through the three-ring circus of idiocy that Democrats stooped to with Kavanaugh.

Apparently it takes longer when you need to talk about how much you love your beer. Accusations of assault can draw things out as well.

Yes, accusations by an emotionally unstable person that appear out of nowhere years later, then held by Sen Feinstein do take time.

+1
Think how fast those 35+ year old allegations could have been cleared up had Feinstein not sat on them until the Democrats needed a Hail Mary. Oh well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

No it’s not. 🙂

What are you talking about? Kentaji is her name. I have no problem using it.

NP but while you proudly use her first name you might want to get it right.

Might want to pass that advice along to the OP of this thread.

OP could be the same poster as misspelling PP.

OP is not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I noticed that this thread is just on page 3 on day 2 of the hearings. Compared to the multiple 250-page threads per day circus for Kavanaugh. Thank goodness for a decent candidate.

Yes, I’m glad Republicans aren’t putting Kentaji through the three-ring circus of idiocy that Democrats stooped to with Kavanaugh.

Apparently it takes longer when you need to talk about how much you love your beer. Accusations of assault can draw things out as well.

Yes, accusations by an emotionally unstable person that appear out of nowhere years later, then held by Sen Feinstein do take time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hawley doesn't seem to understand what judges do.

He doth protest too much - it wouldn't surprise me if he were a pedophile.

Yup, that's what I said in the thread it was posted first. The investigative journalists should dig into his history...

NP. I thought the same thing and even called his office asking if he was a pedophile.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

No it’s not. 🙂

What are you talking about? Kentaji is her name. I have no problem using it.

NP but while you proudly use her first name you might want to get it right.

Might want to pass that advice along to the OP of this thread.

OP could be the same poster as misspelling PP.

Senator Hirano just won this hearing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

No it’s not. 🙂

What are you talking about? Kentaji is her name. I have no problem using it.

NP but while you proudly use her first name you might want to get it right.

Might want to pass that advice along to the OP of this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

No it’s not. 🙂

What are you talking about? Kentaji is her name. I have no problem using it.

NP but while you proudly use her first name you might want to get it right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

No it’s not. 🙂

What are you talking about? Kentaji is her name. I have no problem using it.

Anonymous wrote:Last chance for a black woman as justice. Next an Asian followed by hispanics as their majority — thankfully — takes over the country.

But you're not fixated on race, are you? Nope, not you!