Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redshirting for no other reason than "but he'll be the youngest" is a symptom of entitlement and mollycoddling.
Well, I'm actually considering it for my "youngest" DD who will turn 5 in Sept so that she won't be 13 and going to a HS with 19 year old men.
LOL - you're really trying to stir the pot and keep this post alive, but your trolling is getting a bit obvious now.
That's the first time I've posted, weirdo.
I am a honest to god mother who is worried about this issue. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the mom whose youngest will be 13 when she starts high school... the solution is to encourage less redshirting (therefore fewer 19-year-olds in high school), not to capitulate. That just makes things worse and perpetuates the cycle. Surely you can see that.
Of course I can. But it's my child I'm not willing to risk to prove a point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the mom whose youngest will be 13 when she starts high school... the solution is to encourage less redshirting (therefore fewer 19-year-olds in high school), not to capitulate. That just makes things worse and perpetuates the cycle. Surely you can see that.
Of course I can. But it's my child I'm not willing to risk to prove a point.
Anonymous wrote:To the mom whose youngest will be 13 when she starts high school... the solution is to encourage less redshirting (therefore fewer 19-year-olds in high school), not to capitulate. That just makes things worse and perpetuates the cycle. Surely you can see that.
Anonymous wrote:The 19-year-old "men" thing is just bait. I went to a subpar suburban high school many years ago and there were plenty of 19 year-old "men" there. They had been held back. Many of them had troubled family lives, no academic support at home, police histories, etc. I don't know if I'd say they were "trouble" for those not in their group, but the situation was not great. Nobody was up in arms about it though, yet somehow it is kids with parents affluent enough to buy them an additional year of preschool, boys whose parents are concerned enough about their social-emotional development that they think they need extra "time" or OT for their small motor to develop -- these are the boys you are so worried about???? You think these kids are "mollycoddled" but you also think they are going to turn into hardened rapists?????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redshirting for no other reason than "but he'll be the youngest" is a symptom of entitlement and mollycoddling.
Well, I'm actually considering it for my "youngest" DD who will turn 5 in Sept so that she won't be 13 and going to a HS with 19 year old men.
LOL - you're really trying to stir the pot and keep this post alive, but your trolling is getting a bit obvious now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redshirting for no other reason than "but he'll be the youngest" is a symptom of entitlement and mollycoddling.
Well, I'm actually considering it for my "youngest" DD who will turn 5 in Sept so that she won't be 13 and going to a HS with 19 year old men.