Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feminist and conservatives should be the first one standing up with them.

Conservatives do for sure. Feminists. Nope

Anonymous wrote:I still don’t understand what the policy “ask” is for SAH parents.

Universal basic income for SAH parents? Subsidized maternity costs and early child education? An additional tax credit?

What exactly do you want politicians to do?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feminist and conservatives should be the first one standing up with them.

Plus one - should be bipartisan.

Many SAHM have little choice due to need to care for special needs children, ailing parents or family members with serious illnesses.

What would be the best way to put this issue on their agenda? It doesn’t matter we are man or woman, taking care of home or taking care of business, every voter should be able to call their congressperson and ask them to put their support behind it. Ones who can write well, should be doing opinion pieces on it. Even print media is full of biased and condescending material created in recent past.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any party, lobby or an individual politician advocating for people who work without titles and compensations? Its been a traditional role serving nation’s most important units known as families, nation’s most important asset known as minor citizens and nation’s most important buildings known as homes. They fill so many voids in the society but get no recognition, no compensation or no one protecting this endangered species. Isn’t it about time for them to stand up for their rights and for others to acknowledge and support it?

Considering how many women aspire to this, even temporarily, it’s hardly endangered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there any party, lobby or an individual politician advocating for people who work without titles and compensations? Its been a traditional role serving nation’s most important units known as families, nation’s most important asset known as minor citizens and nation’s most important buildings known as homes. They fill so many voids in the society but get no recognition, no compensation or no one protecting this endangered species. Isn’t it about time for them to stand up for their rights and for others to acknowledge and support it?

It shows privilege to suggest your family can get by on one income.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s how media has conditioned society, people feel their worth and right to exist is tied to their career.

It's a brilliant strategy for the titans of industry. They have people taking pride in going the extra mile for some meaningless project at work rather than raising kids.

Anonymous wrote:Is there any party, lobby or an individual politician advocating for people who work without titles and compensations? Its been a traditional role serving nation’s most important units known as families, nation’s most important asset known as minor citizens and nation’s most important buildings known as homes. They fill so many voids in the society but get no recognition, no compensation or no one protecting this endangered species. Isn’t it about time for them to stand up for their rights and for others to acknowledge and support it?

Anonymous wrote:Is there any party, lobby or an individual politician advocating for people who work without titles and compensations? Its been a traditional role serving nation’s most important units known as families, nation’s most important asset known as minor citizens and nation’s most important buildings known as homes. They fill so many voids in the society but get no recognition, no compensation or no one protecting this endangered species. Isn’t it about time for them to stand up for their rights and for others to acknowledge and support it?

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to figure out what exactly sahp’s think they need lobbying for?

Most of this post seems to be about respect, which isn’t legislated.

I was home for 2 years with my youngest (not really by choice). There is definitely a divide between parents staying home and parents working.

It is also incredibly difficult to live on just one income these days, unless it is VERY high.

There are a lot of things we could do to better support families in general - universal healthcare, affordable childcare, affordable housing options, etc.

But I really am still trying to figure out what exactly OP is advocating for.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feminist and conservatives should be the first one standing up with them.

Plus one - should be bipartisan.

Many SAHM have little choice due to need to care for special needs children, ailing parents or family members with serious illnesses.

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to figure out what exactly sahp’s think they need lobbying for?

Most of this post seems to be about respect, which isn’t legislated.

I was home for 2 years with my youngest (not really by choice). There is definitely a divide between parents staying home and parents working.

It is also incredibly difficult to live on just one income these days, unless it is VERY high.

There are a lot of things we could do to better support families in general - universal healthcare, affordable childcare, affordable housing options, etc.

But I really am still trying to figure out what exactly OP is advocating for.

Anonymous wrote:I do think children need and deserve more of their parents time and attention than many receive. But that role should be shared by men and women. We need to evolve, for the benefit of all adults and children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised no one ever stood up for this group and would love to see politicians advocating for it on local and National level.

Conservatives like it in theory. But only if families themselves pay for it.

Don't expect a handout, SAHMs.

Conservative here. I agree. Never wanted a handout, just wanted other women to stop telling me I was wasting my life.