Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
It depends on what that person did for a living and what we had in common. If he was a scientist/researcher who made little to no money, yes, absolutely. Struggling author who was trying to get published? Journalist? Sure. Someone with no education? Likely not. For me, it is the education level that is of greater interested rather than salary. I make the bulk of our HHI, though, so I'm not worried too much about what my DH brings in.
Ok good luck marrying a struggling educated author. I would probably first do a stone clad prenup/alimony waiver if I were in such position. I have a female friend who is urologist; at 48 she married a very nice phD college teacher who was making under 100K (she was making 600K). They had 2 kids and he was with children home. Then he cheated when kids grew up as he wasn't particular overloaded at job while she worked night shifts. A very messy divorce followed when they were in their 60s, 50/50 custody and she got a check from him for $7/month life-time alimony. She cried and borrowed money to fight but all in vain
Sorry I want to have a peaceful retirement. Men have lots of testosterone and will use it when they are not tasked being at home
Yeah I call BS. Why would he be paying her alimony at all when she makes 6x as much? She should be paying him. Doesn’t matter that he cheated, men pay their cheating ex wives alimony all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
It depends on what that person did for a living and what we had in common. If he was a scientist/researcher who made little to no money, yes, absolutely. Struggling author who was trying to get published? Journalist? Sure. Someone with no education? Likely not. For me, it is the education level that is of greater interested rather than salary. I make the bulk of our HHI, though, so I'm not worried too much about what my DH brings in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
It depends on what that person did for a living and what we had in common. If he was a scientist/researcher who made little to no money, yes, absolutely. Struggling author who was trying to get published? Journalist? Sure. Someone with no education? Likely not. For me, it is the education level that is of greater interested rather than salary. I make the bulk of our HHI, though, so I'm not worried too much about what my DH brings in.
Ok good luck marrying a struggling educated author. I would probably first do a stone clad prenup/alimony waiver if I were in such position. I have a female friend who is urologist; at 48 she married a very nice phD college teacher who was making under 100K (she was making 600K). They had 2 kids and he was with children home. Then he cheated when kids grew up as he wasn't particular overloaded at job while she worked night shifts. A very messy divorce followed when they were in their 60s, 50/50 custody and she got a check from him for $7/month life-time alimony. She cried and borrowed money to fight but all in vain
Sorry I want to have a peaceful retirement. Men have lots of testosterone and will use it when they are not tasked being at home
Anonymous wrote:serious question but doesn’t that kind of limit you to doctors, corporate lawyers and hedge fund traders? I work for a non profit making 130k and I didn’t realize I am considered low income by folks around here. Yes 300k is easier but I also have a decent house, which while no McLean mega mansion is a good house in a nice neighborhood, with a manageable mortgage. I also drive used cars, don’t spend money on luxury items etc. good thing I’m not single because clearly I couldn’t get a date with any DC women because clearly that isn’t enough.Anonymous wrote:Woman: $300K if he's older than 50, around 200K if he's closer to 40. I am 44, my own income is $250K
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
It depends on what that person did for a living and what we had in common. If he was a scientist/researcher who made little to no money, yes, absolutely. Struggling author who was trying to get published? Journalist? Sure. Someone with no education? Likely not. For me, it is the education level that is of greater interested rather than salary. I make the bulk of our HHI, though, so I'm not worried too much about what my DH brings in.
Ok good luck marrying a struggling educated author. I would probably first do a stone clad prenup/alimony waiver if I were in such position. I have a female friend who is urologist; at 48 she married a very nice phD college teacher who was making under 100K (she was making 600K). They had 2 kids and he was with children home. Then he cheated when kids grew up as he wasn't particular overloaded at job while she worked night shifts. A very messy divorce followed when they were in their 60s, 50/50 custody and she got a check from him for $7/month life-time alimony. She cried and borrowed money to fight but all in vain
Sorry I want to have a peaceful retirement. Men have lots of testosterone and will use it when they are not tasked being at home
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women who demand $200k plus: how are you going to make that happen? What’s your plan? And don’t answer you already met you lawyer/MD husband in college. How are you going to make it happen now?
They aren't, because only hot women marry men 200k+ and hot women don't post on online forums for dinosaurs
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
It depends on what that person did for a living and what we had in common. If he was a scientist/researcher who made little to no money, yes, absolutely. Struggling author who was trying to get published? Journalist? Sure. Someone with no education? Likely not. For me, it is the education level that is of greater interested rather than salary. I make the bulk of our HHI, though, so I'm not worried too much about what my DH brings in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I started dating my H in college, so zero? But I knew he was hard working (he did CS and applied economics while playing baseball), his family was well off and he was the most handsome dude I've ever seen in my entire life. His eyes are amazing, they change between blue, green, and light grey depending on what he's wearing and he has the juiciest lips and he's tall too. He's making around 4 now and I make 2. IMO, if I'd date now, I'd make sure that there are no addiction, gambling, high levels of debt before even thinking of income.
And I am making 20/year and my husband is Brad Pitt
No no, I meant 400 and 200. He's hotter than BP, BP is short. Mine looks like Kelly Slater.
Kelly slater is 5ft 9 and bald
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
I am no different from you: I married at 26, making $85K back then, my exH made about $120K. We divorced at 600K family income each of us retaining 50% of $5mm family assets.
Ok let me ask you this: if you get divorced in 2022, have your kids and the house, would you date someone making 85K at age 45-50 with a view of ever marrying this person?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woman - make 200k+, I would date someone who makes $80k with limited debt, or upwards of $100k with "regular" debt (student loans/mortgage/healthcare). It's probably more tied to education level than money, I likely wouldn't date someone without a college degree. I don't want to support someone -but as long as they pay an income-proportionate share of expenses, I don't care. I am a single parent of young kids and prefer to date other single parents of younger kids, so I assume that most of our $$$ is going to kid stuff, anyway. It goes without saying that I would never ever date a man who doesn't provide for his kids.
how a man can provide for his kids on 80K income in DC? How would you date him, if your travel, entertainment options would be so limited (and lower than that you are accustomed to) because of that proportionate share of expenses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.
I was 29 in 2008 - same age as my DH. I'm going to bet that the vast majority of women on this board are not dating in their 50s. While there may be some, it does not constitute the majority of the dating scene.
My point is that excluding a really good match who otherwise meets all criteria based on salary alone is incredibly short-sighted and shallow - and probably why so many people remain single well into 40s/50s. My question is why you can't make your own money? Isn't that a huge red flag about intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills, etc.? I rely on no one to do that for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are all this women who have an abundance of dating choices that they get to filter out by salary? Do women in DC metro have that many options these days?
It wasn't like that in the 2000s when I was dating. I married a man in 2008 who made $65K. We now make HHI $600k.
You know that you can date and marry someone that you love, and then grow together, right? No wonder everyone is so miserable.
How old were you in 2008? These women don't have abundance of dating choices, they just dont want to make poor life choices that would make them even more miserable. It's easy to destroy someone's financial stability in divorce if you joined finances and then become a mooch.
I would rather not date at all than dating someone who is 50 y.o. and makes 60k/year. This is a huge red flag about that person intelligence, goal setting, financial planning, social skills etc.