Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the left trying to control language. Rule of thumb: If someone is telling you what to say or think, it’s probably a lefty.
The party trying to control what people think by banning the teaching of history? Hint: Not the left.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
If they were brilliant they’d be able to make rent.
Drugs, alcohol and mental problems are why they are that way
Mental illness and addiction issues don’t mean people can’t understand basic words or know where they are. Homeless =/= unintelligent. I’m appalled at your attitude toward those less fortunate than you.
You’ve obviously never spent time in an inner city emergency room![]()
Tell me how much you donate before you get sanctimonious
I'm the initial poster. I live in DC and have spent lots of time in the ERs of DMV. I'm terminally ill and also have had lots of inpatient stays, both short and long.
I actually wrote about a homeless mentally ill woman I met in the ER in another thread. I have lots of stories about them. I've shared some on these stories on other threads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the left trying to control language. Rule of thumb: If someone is telling you what to say or think, it’s probably a lefty.
And yet you weirdos have issue with the word “unhoused.” No one demanded that you used the word. But you’re offended by other people using it!
Do you not see how insane you are?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
If they were brilliant they’d be able to make rent.
Drugs, alcohol and mental problems are why they are that way
Mental illness and addiction issues don’t mean people can’t understand basic words or know where they are. Homeless =/= unintelligent. I’m appalled at your attitude toward those less fortunate than you.
You’ve obviously never spent time in an inner city emergency room![]()
Tell me how much you donate before you get sanctimonious love
Anonymous wrote:It’s the left trying to control language. Rule of thumb: If someone is telling you what to say or think, it’s probably a lefty.
Anonymous wrote:It’s the left trying to control language. Rule of thumb: If someone is telling you what to say or think, it’s probably a lefty.
Anonymous wrote:It’s the left trying to control language. Rule of thumb: If someone is telling you what to say or think, it’s probably a lefty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
If they were brilliant they’d be able to make rent.
Drugs, alcohol and mental problems are why they are that way
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
If they were brilliant they’d be able to make rent.
Drugs, alcohol and mental problems are why they are that way
Mental illness and addiction issues don’t mean people can’t understand basic words or know where they are. Homeless =/= unintelligent. I’m appalled at your attitude toward those less fortunate than you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
If they were brilliant they’d be able to make rent.
Drugs, alcohol and mental problems are why they are that way
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.
Seriously it sounds like you do not know many homeless/ unhoused people. I have. Many of them are brilliant. There are many homeless/ unhoused people now due to real estate affordable home crisis, being homeless could happen to anyone.
Anonymous wrote:If you asked a homeless person if they are unhoused they probably wouldn't have the intellectual capacity to understand it's the new term for homeless, and probably answer no.
Just like if you housed them in St. Elizabeth's, they wouldn't know the difference between there and an apartment.
The prefix un and suffix less mean the same. House and home have the same meaning. It's that simple. Unhoused is the same as homeless.
I can't imagine a homeless person using unhoused in a sentence.