Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

The report was that Roberts asked everyone to mask up, so this statement that Sotomayor didn’t make such a request doesn’t undermine the original report.

So not only is Gorsuch not wearing a mask, he's gas-lighting us as well.

Also, the thread title is still correct because he’s a d**k for not wearing a mask regardless of whether anyone asked him to or not, or who in particular asked him.

Not according to Sotomayor who clearly knows him better than YOU do and apparently has no issue with him not wearing a mask.

Anonymous wrote:If there’s not even a kernel of truth to the story, Gorsuch can put this all to rest by publicly stating that he will happily don a mask in the workplace, should such a request be made.

He doesn’t even have to make a public apology statement; he can just start wearing a mask when he sits next to his colleagues like he was asked. We will see what he does when they next sit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

The report was that Roberts asked everyone to mask up, so this statement that Sotomayor didn’t make such a request doesn’t undermine the original report.

So not only is Gorsuch not wearing a mask, he's gas-lighting us as well.

Also, the thread title is still correct because he’s a d**k for not wearing a mask regardless of whether anyone asked him to or not, or who in particular asked him.

If there’s not even a kernel of truth to the story, Gorsuch can put this all to rest by publicly stating that he will happily don a mask in the workplace, should such a request be made.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

The report was that Roberts asked everyone to mask up, so this statement that Sotomayor didn’t make such a request doesn’t undermine the original report.

So not only is Gorsuch not wearing a mask, he's gas-lighting us as well.

Anonymous wrote:Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

The report was that Roberts asked everyone to mask up, so this statement that Sotomayor didn’t make such a request doesn’t undermine the original report.

Anonymous wrote:Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

That's a classic non-denial, denial. Totenberg didn't report that Sotomayor asked Gorsuch. What she reported was:

Sotomayor did not feel safe in close proximity to people who were unmasked. Chief Justice John Roberts, understanding that, in some form or other asked the other justices to mask up. They all did except Gorsuch, who, as it happens, sits next to Sotomayor on the bench.

Remember people..... 48 Hour rule. In this case, it was 24 hours.

So, is being a nutjob a requirement to be a libertarian? Rand Paul and Gorsuch both seem to be nutjobs. If he is such a big man, then Gorsuch should volunteer to work in a Covid ward maskless 8 hours a day for 40 hours and go home each day and not wear mask at home. Will he survive then? Can he be impartial in his judgments or will he declare his libertarian thinking cloud his decisions? Can we trust his decisions to be impartial and only based on the facts presented in a case before him?

Anonymous wrote:She's diabetic, as are my parents yet for decades I've watched my diet, exercised and took care of myself, just like Goursch. We are the same age and neither of us have diabetes. Why should he wear a mask when it isn't mandatory and one of his colleagues didn't take care of herself? Meanwhile I spent Sunday evening in the warmth of my childhood home with my parents without masks.

She is a type 1 diabetic since childhood.

Anonymous wrote:The fact that he would even joke about a Fascism Forever Club indicates his douchbaggery.

The fact that he's still edgelord'ing at his age and position is just pathetic. There's a lot of grown men with similar high school mindsets.

Those who refuse to get the vaccine or wear masks are just plain selfish.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess I haven't become a total cynic yet, because I find this news quite shocking. I disagree with him on just about everything, but I thought Gorsuch was a better human being this. Wow.

My feelings exactly. I thought better of him. What a disappointment.

+1. The circumstances of him being a white man who is so defiant willing to put a woman of color (with an underlying health condition that medical science tells us is a serious co-morbidity, no less!) in this vulnerable position just looks so terrible, at least from my perspective. Would he have made the same decision if it were Justice Roberts with diabetes? Of course not. What a raging as*ha#!

I have to say I was also surprised by this. Let’s even assume race or gender or anything else is not a factor here, it’s just an ugly, ugly, ugly way to behave.

The fact of the matter is that race and gender are factors here. They simply are. And someone as intelligent as Gorsuch knows it, which makes it all the more shameful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess I haven't become a total cynic yet, because I find this news quite shocking. I disagree with him on just about everything, but I thought Gorsuch was a better human being this. Wow.

My feelings exactly. I thought better of him. What a disappointment.

+1. The circumstances of him being a white man who is so defiant willing to put a woman of color (with an underlying health condition that medical science tells us is a serious co-morbidity, no less!) in this vulnerable position just looks so terrible, at least from my perspective. Would he have made the same decision if it were Justice Roberts with diabetes? Of course not. What a raging as*ha#!

I have to say I was also surprised by this. Let’s even assume race or gender or anything else is not a factor here, it’s just an ugly, ugly, ugly way to behave.

He’s a dick.