If you're providing a home for a unwanted abandoned child you've done a great thing. What else is there to say????
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
As a teacher I have contact with many adopted older kids. I think it would help if there was not such a push to proclaim adoption status and look for bio parents. There are plenty of naturally born children who do not know every detail of their parents and ancestors lives … and they are going very well in life. Making it an issue is just that: making it an issue. I’m sure I will get flamed for this. I have had so many students introduced themselves as “Hi I’m Jacob and I’m adopted!” It’s ok but is it really your only identity?
As a teacher, please make sure you’re not using “naturally born” in your vocabulary anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.
Lol. DNA will decide this for you in short time, dear.
adoptive mom here. I’ve literally never heard my kid or any other kid say this. We are in a super group for interracial adoptive families so I’m around other adoptive kids not just my own. Never heard s kid say this or a parent say their kid says it. So it doesn’t mean it never happened. But it’s not common.Anonymous wrote:As a teacher I have contact with many adopted older kids. I think it would help if there was not such a push to proclaim adoption status and look for bio parents. There are plenty of naturally born children who do not know every detail of their parents and ancestors lives … and they are going very well in life. Making it an issue is just that: making it an issue. I’m sure I will get flamed for this. I have had so many students introduced themselves as “Hi I’m Jacob and I’m adopted!” It’s ok but is it really your only identity?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.
Well actually, your child did not get a vote. So, it would be more accurate to say "not for my husband and me."
No, it does not mean that. It means for the whole family.
Minor children do not get a say in the decisions of adults. Do you consult your kids for major parental decisions?
The anti-adopters on here need to get out. We are here to support and encourage adoptions.
And yet any consideration of the child's beliefs or feelings....still about you, isn't it?
Shut up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher I have contact with many adopted older kids. I think it would help if there was not such a push to proclaim adoption status and look for bio parents. There are plenty of naturally born children who do not know every detail of their parents and ancestors lives … and they are going very well in life. Making it an issue is just that: making it an issue. I’m sure I will get flamed for this. I have had so many students introduced themselves as “Hi I’m Jacob and I’m adopted!” It’s ok but is it really your only identity?
As a teacher, please make sure you’re not using “naturally born” in your vocabulary anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.
Well actually, your child did not get a vote. So, it would be more accurate to say "not for my husband and me."
No, it does not mean that. It means for the whole family.
Minor children do not get a say in the decisions of adults. Do you consult your kids for major parental decisions?
The anti-adopters on here need to get out. We are here to support and encourage adoptions.
And yet any consideration of the child's beliefs or feelings....still about you, isn't it?
Anonymous wrote:"the closest thing to a miracle that we have ever experienced"
This, exactly PP, you have captured it perfectly.
--another grateful adoptive mom
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do a lot of research about (domestic) open adoptions. Realize the life-long implications of having the birth parent(s) and their extended families involved in your child's life, and if that is something you are willing to take on.
We only want to do closed adoption.
Is it only possibly trough international adoption?
Anonymous wrote:I consider private adoptions (brokered by attorneys) to be MUCH more susceptible to ethical problems and coercion than adoptions brokered by licensed US agencies. This is particularly true when the birth mothers in question are from poor countries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.
Well actually, your child did not get a vote. So, it would be more accurate to say "not for my husband and me."
No, it does not mean that. It means for the whole family.
Minor children do not get a say in the decisions of adults. Do you consult your kids for major parental decisions?
The anti-adopters on here need to get out. We are here to support and encourage adoptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.
Well actually, your child did not get a vote. So, it would be more accurate to say "not for my husband and me."
Anonymous wrote:As a teacher I have contact with many adopted older kids. I think it would help if there was not such a push to proclaim adoption status and look for bio parents. There are plenty of naturally born children who do not know every detail of their parents and ancestors lives … and they are going very well in life. Making it an issue is just that: making it an issue. I’m sure I will get flamed for this. I have had so many students introduced themselves as “Hi I’m Jacob and I’m adopted!” It’s ok but is it really your only identity?
Anonymous wrote:We did international to avoid the whole "open" adoption thing. Not for our family.