Anonymous wrote:Liked "on the bright side, omicron looks like it might lead to the end of the pandemic."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
I was supportive of schools’ being all remote last year, but I disagree with you here. We have tools and knowledge now that we didn’t have then, and we should use them to try to keep schools open. I am under no illusion that it will be smooth—nor am I a Bowser/Ferebee fan—but I am glad that they are trying. DCPS is being much more thoughtful about this than surrounding school systems, which are just opening and hoping for the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
It was not like that at every single school in DC. My child’s elementary school was fine and the kids enjoyed their last days before the break. It honestly didn’t feel any different for us. That is why a system wide closure is not appropriate. Some schools probably do need a reset and it sounds like that will likely happen if enough staff tests positive. I think going forward parents should say what particular school they are talking about instead of using such broad strokes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
I was supportive of schools’ being all remote last year, but I disagree with you here. We have tools and knowledge now that we didn’t have then, and we should use them to try to keep schools open. I am under no illusion that it will be smooth—nor am I a Bowser/Ferebee fan—but I am glad that they are trying. DCPS is being much more thoughtful about this than surrounding school systems, which are just opening and hoping for the best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Covid doesn’t care about your routine.
Next week will be a complete mess at schools.
Kids did not learn a damn thing the week before Christmas and they probably won’t learn a damn thing next week either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Easier for who?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there two kinds of tests available at libraries?
Would be helpful if someone who has actually gone through the library pick up rest could answer.
No, there is only one kind of test. At the Petworth Library, the line was very long but orderly and moving along. Everyone received two boxes containing four at-home tests.
This is not accurate. Libraries are distributing DC’s test yourself PCR test (which you drop off in the drop box with results in 3-5 days) and rapid tests.
Not every library has rapid tests, and not every library is distributing them in the same way. West End had you come inside to get the antigen tests.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are there two kinds of tests available at libraries?
Would be helpful if someone who has actually gone through the library pick up rest could answer.
No, there is only one kind of test. At the Petworth Library, the line was very long but orderly and moving along. Everyone received two boxes containing four at-home tests.
This is not accurate. Libraries are distributing DC’s test yourself PCR test (which you drop off in the drop box with results in 3-5 days) and rapid tests.
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t it easier to just go virtual for two weeks. How much teaching will happen if half the class is missing. And some teachers will be missing.
Anonymous wrote:Many of the libraries only have PCR tests. I went to tenleytown yesterday to get some and they were out.
I’ve been using those pcr tests all fall.