Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is refreshing not to see an actress with the over stuffed breast implants.
She appears to be about the size of Audrey Hepburn.
https://www.tatler.com/article/audrey-hepburn-wedding-dress
In the 1920's, 1930's 1940's and 1950's and even the 1960's and 1970's Lily would be considered to be normal weight albeit a bit on the small size. Take a look at crowd scenes in movies from these periods. People were much smaller then.
We are so used to seeing morbidly obese people such that heavy people appear to be "normal" to us.
Audrey Hepburn starved herself. That is also a well known fact.
Stop with the morbidly obese black and white talk. Every other woman on the show is neither skeletal nor obese. Lily Collins is pretty much the skinniest celebrity we’ve seen since Amy Winehouse (and I don’t have to remind you how that turned out). This has nothing to do with the obesity epidemic warping our perceptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How many times does it need to be said that she is anorexic?
She is anorexic. She has said so.
Is or was? Is anorexia a condition you have permanently?
Yes, anorexia is considered a permanent condition. Like alcoholism, you can be in or out of recovery.
A family member died of anorexia. I do not have an issue with people expressing concern over an admitted anorexic weight loss. I suspect if people had expressed more concern for my family member, and alerted us to her substantial weight loss while away at college, we may haven been able to get her in treatment before it was too late.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How many times does it need to be said that she is anorexic?
She is anorexic. She has said so.
Is or was? Is anorexia a condition you have permanently?
Anonymous wrote:It is refreshing not to see an actress with the over stuffed breast implants.
She appears to be about the size of Audrey Hepburn.
https://www.tatler.com/article/audrey-hepburn-wedding-dress
In the 1920's, 1930's 1940's and 1950's and even the 1960's and 1970's Lily would be considered to be normal weight albeit a bit on the small size. Take a look at crowd scenes in movies from these periods. People were much smaller then.
We are so used to seeing morbidly obese people such that heavy people appear to be "normal" to us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, people act like chest bones shouldn't be visible. I'm not going to weigh in on the actress's size, but OP complaining about "visible chest bones" is a bit annoying-- most people who are on the lower side of healthy weight have visible chest bones. It's nothing to be ashamed of and it's annoying when people body shame like this. If you prefer people to be thicker, that's great but not everyone is and that's okay too.
This, and this is why I find dissecting her body in this thread to be gross and unproductive.
I’ve had visible chest bones, and visible ribs, and visible hip bones, my entire life, except when I was pregnant. I don’t have and have never had an eating disorder. I’m just very thin, and my body is also structured so that even when I gain weight, my hips, clavicle, and ribs are still visible.
I have lost a “scary” amount of weight before, but from stress/anxiety, not an eating disorder. It was scary because I am already naturally very thin and therefore dropping 10-15 lbs but me close to it under 100 lbs. I didn’t like it and wasn’t excited about my weight loss at all. But I also learned other people don’t understand weight at my end of the spectrum at all. People assume the weight loss is due to avoiding food. They don’t understand and that some bodies will metabolize a lot of calories very easily, and that it’s possible to want to eat and be unable to do so because for other reasons. For instance, my anxiety caused such severe heart burn and acid reflux that I would struggle to get down more than a few bites of food because even though I was hungry, my body felt full.
Commenting on this stuff when all you know about low weight is a bunch of cliches about anorexia is just irresponsible. Not your body. MYOB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like a child in some of the scenes, not good.
No, that's great. She'll look young for a long time and it's nice to see a child-like young women instead of 22 year olds looking like 40-year old escorts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, people act like chest bones shouldn't be visible. I'm not going to weigh in on the actress's size, but OP complaining about "visible chest bones" is a bit annoying-- most people who are on the lower side of healthy weight have visible chest bones. It's nothing to be ashamed of and it's annoying when people body shame like this. If you prefer people to be thicker, that's great but not everyone is and that's okay too.
This, and this is why I find dissecting her body in this thread to be gross and unproductive.
I’ve had visible chest bones, and visible ribs, and visible hip bones, my entire life, except when I was pregnant. I don’t have and have never had an eating disorder. I’m just very thin, and my body is also structured so that even when I gain weight, my hips, clavicle, and ribs are still visible.
I have lost a “scary” amount of weight before, but from stress/anxiety, not an eating disorder. It was scary because I am already naturally very thin and therefore dropping 10-15 lbs but me close to it under 100 lbs. I didn’t like it and wasn’t excited about my weight loss at all. But I also learned other people don’t understand weight at my end of the spectrum at all. People assume the weight loss is due to avoiding food. They don’t understand and that some bodies will metabolize a lot of calories very easily, and that it’s possible to want to eat and be unable to do so because for other reasons. For instance, my anxiety caused such severe heart burn and acid reflux that I would struggle to get down more than a few bites of food because even though I was hungry, my body felt full.
Commenting on this stuff when all you know about low weight is a bunch of cliches about anorexia is just irresponsible. Not your body. MYOB.
Anonymous wrote:Eh, people act like chest bones shouldn't be visible. I'm not going to weigh in on the actress's size, but OP complaining about "visible chest bones" is a bit annoying-- most people who are on the lower side of healthy weight have visible chest bones. It's nothing to be ashamed of and it's annoying when people body shame like this. If you prefer people to be thicker, that's great but not everyone is and that's okay too.
Anonymous wrote:Eh, people act like chest bones shouldn't be visible. I'm not going to weigh in on the actress's size, but OP complaining about "visible chest bones" is a bit annoying-- most people who are on the lower side of healthy weight have visible chest bones. It's nothing to be ashamed of and it's annoying when people body shame like this. If you prefer people to be thicker, that's great but not everyone is and that's okay too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like a child in some of the scenes, not good.
No, that's great. She'll look young for a long time and it's nice to see a child-like young women instead of 22 year olds looking like 40-year old escorts.
She’ll age very quickly if she doesn’t get help.
Anonymous wrote:It is refreshing not to see an actress with the over stuffed breast implants.
She appears to be about the size of Audrey Hepburn.
https://www.tatler.com/article/audrey-hepburn-wedding-dress
In the 1920's, 1930's 1940's and 1950's and even the 1960's and 1970's Lily would be considered to be normal weight albeit a bit on the small size. Take a look at crowd scenes in movies from these periods. People were much smaller then.
We are so used to seeing morbidly obese people such that heavy people appear to be "normal" to us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like a child in some of the scenes, not good.
No, that's great. She'll look young for a long time and it's nice to see a child-like young women instead of 22 year olds looking like 40-year old escorts.