Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reputable employers aren't interesting in hiring graduates from non-competitive engineering schools. The students who actually graduate from the tougher schools are the best of the best.
Hiring manager at a tech firm. Disagree with the above. We actively hire from most ABET accredited engineering programs. We are typical of tech firms, not unusual.
Our experience is that if the student graduated with a -specific- engineering degree (examples of specific degrees include AeroE, CompE, EE, MechE) they are fully capable of doing the work. ABET provides a floor, but it is a high floor, not a low floor.
Our experience is that "rank" and "prestige" of an engineering program do not translate into better on the job abilities. Locally, we are -equally- happy with engineering graduates from CNU, GMU, JHU, ODU, UMCP, UMBC, UVA, VCU, and VT -- provided they took rigorous upper-level in-major electives.
We do not hire students who got a degree in "General Engineering" because they lack the depth of knowledge in a specific field of engineering that we need.
We also find that a degree in "Engineering Technology" covers less material than the corresponding "Engineering" degree. For example, we are not hiring folks with an EET degree - because they are less capable than folks with an actual EE degree.
Anonymous wrote:Reputable employers aren't interesting in hiring graduates from non-competitive engineering schools. The students who actually graduate from the tougher schools are the best of the best.
Anonymous wrote:There are weed out courses and programs for certain. It is unfortunate, but most convey that information up front, so it is on you to research when choosing a school.
For example, Wisconsin, Florida and others all post that certain GPA's are needed after certain courses or at the end of each year. You can even go on sites like madgrades to see that a portion of students do not make the cut in various courses and therefore are not likely going to make it in - though some offer a grace semester to recover.
We chose a school where a C- or better is a pass for the course (some are of course curved). Our student has not needed it, but he likes that he does not have anything hanging over his head - the work is hard enough as it is.
Engineering is hard for most students and requires a lot of study - if your student made it through with some C's, I would definitely still congratulate them - most students around the country and world cannot do it.
Anonymous wrote:There are weed out courses and programs for certain. It is unfortunate, but most convey that information up front, so it is on you to research when choosing a school.
For example, Wisconsin, Florida and others all post that certain GPA's are needed after certain courses or at the end of each year. You can even go on sites like madgrades to see that a portion of students do not make the cut in various courses and therefore are not likely going to make it in - though some offer a grace semester to recover.
We chose a school where a C- or better is a pass for the course (some are of course curved). Our student has not needed it, but he likes that he does not have anything hanging over his head - the work is hard enough as it is.
Engineering is hard for most students and requires a lot of study - if your student made it through with some C's, I would definitely still congratulate them - most students around the country and world cannot do it.
Anonymous wrote:Tests don't bother me, generally it's the curve I hate. If 90% of the students get it, the failures still get a C and there's a wasted A-B distribution across the set of students who grasped the material.
Just survive and get through it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not all engineering programs have intentional weed-out classes. Programs with high (maybe 90+%) 5-yr graduation rates in engineering of the students who started in engineering likely don't have intentional weed-out classes.
The better schools absolutely have intentional weed-out classes.
Or maybe the material is just tough.
Why would they intentionally want kids to drop out?
The very top Engineering schools don't (Top 5). They figure if you got in there you are smart enough. Weed out not necessary.
Correct.
Look at Ivies with true engineering programs as well as MIT, CMU, UCB, JHU, Stanford, maybe couple others: the retention rate from freshmen in the E school to sophomores is over 95%. Thus there is no weedout, however these colleges do the weeding as part of admission. When you only let in 1500+ with mostly 5s on Stem APs, you can be successful in engineering.
Anonymous wrote:Are weedouts and grade curves necessary? The curve was what I hated most about law school. Why would I volunteer my kid for that, especially when I know my kid will learn the material? Doesn’t need fake accommodations or anything to finish homework on time or get to subject matter mastery. [/quote
How do you know your kid is REALLY learning the material without getting rigorously tested?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not all engineering programs have intentional weed-out classes. Programs with high (maybe 90+%) 5-yr graduation rates in engineering of the students who started in engineering likely don't have intentional weed-out classes.
The better schools absolutely have intentional weed-out classes.
40% of Stanford is on disability. What say u?
Or maybe the material is just tough.
Why would they intentionally want kids to drop out?
The very top Engineering schools don't (Top 5). They figure if you got in there you are smart enough. Weed out not necessary.
Correct.
Look at Ivies with true engineering programs as well as MIT, CMU, UCB, JHU, Stanford, maybe couple others: the retention rate from freshmen in the E school to sophomores is over 95%. Thus there is no weedout, however these colleges do the weeding as part of admission. When you only let in 1500+ with mostly 5s on Stem APs, you can be successful in engineering.