Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know Brian Schwalb well and he'd be terrific in this role. Super smart, with integrity, and has big-law, Justice Dept, and management experience. Interestingly, he's using the city's public financing program to fundraise - not taking large corporate donations. Both Racine and Irv Nelson (the last appointed AG in DC) endorsed him immediately. Fortunate for DC Schwalb is throwing his hat in the ring.
Schwalb is a major cause of the current crime epidemic.
He IS the problem, not the solution.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are any of the DAs in contention tough on crime? Or is it more woke agenda no bail, no incarceration, sort of namby pamby slap on wrist for violent felons?
Why would any sane voter vote for a “tough on crime” candidate?
Anonymous wrote:I know Brian Schwalb well and he'd be terrific in this role. Super smart, with integrity, and has big-law, Justice Dept, and management experience. Interestingly, he's using the city's public financing program to fundraise - not taking large corporate donations. Both Racine and Irv Nelson (the last appointed AG in DC) endorsed him immediately. Fortunate for DC Schwalb is throwing his hat in the ring.
Anonymous wrote:Are people here really suggesting that someone with a law license who hasn’t practiced in over a decade should become the city’s chief lawyer? If you needed major surgery would you pick an MD who hadn’t been in an operating room in over a decade? This is an illustration of so much of what is wrong with DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are any of the DAs in contention tough on crime? Or is it more woke agenda no bail, no incarceration, sort of namby pamby slap on wrist for violent felons?
DC’s AG has nothing to do with the prosecution of adults charged with violent crimes. They do however handle the prosecution of juveniles charged with violent crime.
Anonymous wrote:Are any of the DAs in contention tough on crime? Or is it more woke agenda no bail, no incarceration, sort of namby pamby slap on wrist for violent felons?
Anonymous wrote:Are any of the DAs in contention tough on crime? Or is it more woke agenda no bail, no incarceration, sort of namby pamby slap on wrist for violent felons?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone want to support the guy who is running for AG and refuses to use the Fair Election program funding? The guy who got the popular candidate out of the race.
Stop try9ing to make Spica happen. He has the fewest supporters among DC voters - only 169 as of the April filing.
https://dcgeekery.com/dc-campaign-finance/2022/attorney-general
No need to resort to racial slurs and refusing to take taxpayer money isn’t disqualifying. Indeed, I don’t think Mendelson is taking public funds.
And McDuffie may have been popular, but he was running for the top legal job in the city, and he wasn’t legally qualified to do so. Spiva followed the legal process to challenge it, and the Board of Elections agreed with Spiva’s legal position. McDuffie appealed to the highest court in the city, and they unanimously rejected his legal position.
McDuffie could have gotten re-elected to the Council without much effort, but he chose to seek a position for which he was not legally qualified. Spiva pointed it out, but McDuffie dug his own political grave.