Anonymous wrote:My thoughts on the tournament (09 MLSNext parent)
1. No muddy conditions on the fields (Which i was worried about) and it didn't rain.
2. Fields were about as expected given it is a farm. Lots of ups and downs on the field (I know, first world problems).
3. Fields seemed small for U13's although Bethesda used every inch of evaluable real estate for the 5 fields. You could really tell on the corner kicks.
4. Parent/coach-player areas were well marked and no crazy farmer yelling to get off the grass.
Given the fields, it really did change the nature of play for some of the teams. Looked like a lot more direct play was going on than is usually the case with some of the teams (Alexandria and PPA for example). The top bracket seemed to have a good level of competition for the most part and it we had a fun weekend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are these guest players you keep going on about? 09 SYC had no guest players in last years state cup or in this tournament. Where are you getting your misinformation from?
Re: state cup...check your own twitter feed team photographs lol. Re: this tournament, no idea but kudos if you did it with your regular roster. Ironically though, guest players at a club sponsored tournament like BSC cup would not have been that big of a deal anyway vs. state cup where rules are in place to make sure regularly rostered state players compete in their state competition.
Anonymous wrote:SYC 09's beat Bethesda in the finals
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are these guest players you keep going on about? 09 SYC had no guest players in last years state cup or in this tournament. Where are you getting your misinformation from?
I concur, there was no quest players. I was the ref for that match.
Anonymous wrote:What are these guest players you keep going on about? 09 SYC had no guest players in last years state cup or in this tournament. Where are you getting your misinformation from?
Anonymous wrote:What are these guest players you keep going on about? 09 SYC had no guest players in last years state cup or in this tournament. Where are you getting your misinformation from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SYC 09's beat Bethesda in the finals
Went to penalties. Good game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.
They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.
That is what BRYC does. Lose in league games and then play in tournaments/brackets that they can dominate.
Well, they didn't even win the 4th division. In fact, they scored 2 goals in the final 3 games. That club seriously needs to clean house. Stop letting kids believe they're good enough to make an ECNL team when they are clearly not.
Did you go to the game so you could posit seconds after it was over? You have serious BRYC anger issues. Every post turns into a therapy session.
Anonymous wrote:SYC 09's beat Bethesda in the finals
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.
They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.
That is what BRYC does. Lose in league games and then play in tournaments/brackets that they can dominate.
Well, they didn't even win the 4th division. In fact, they scored 2 goals in the final 3 games. That club seriously needs to clean house. Stop letting kids believe they're good enough to make an ECNL team when they are clearly not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Telling how BRYC 09 ECNL team is in the 4th bracket with Alexandria's second team of the same age group placed two brackets above them. Essentially, their ECNL team is a second a third team for many clubs.
They still shouldn’t have an ECNL team in the 4th division. That’s crazy.
Won their first game 6-0.
That is what BRYC does. Lose in league games and then play in tournaments/brackets that they can dominate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bethesda 09's have been having a great run in MLSNext. They have not lost a game and have only given up one goal this year. That will be a tough bracket to come out of if you are not Bethesda.
A couple of close games, but they made it to the finals against SYC, who beat PPA in the morning.