Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I Believe it’s what’s being sold to them, OP. It’s more the Disney culture than anything. My mom was saying that in the 1950’s there were “hobos”, ghosts, Addams Family and Munsters characters but very few Cinderella’s because they only saw Cinderella once in the theater. My mom has great pictures of herself dressed as Paul McCartney and her siblings as John, George and Ringo. Once she went as cousin It.
I was not as Princess orientated as my DD is because I didn’t watch as much princess crap.
This is my gripe with Disney princesses, and Spiderman, or any other corporate/commercial character that's out there. Parents are the gatekeepers, kids don't have a biological need/desire to dress like a Disney princess or Batman, and posters who don't acknowledge this are annoying. Sure, your kid will grow out of it, but how did your kid grow into it?
OP is also very annoying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I Believe it’s what’s being sold to them, OP. It’s more the Disney culture than anything. My mom was saying that in the 1950’s there were “hobos”, ghosts, Addams Family and Munsters characters but very few Cinderella’s because they only saw Cinderella once in the theater. My mom has great pictures of herself dressed as Paul McCartney and her siblings as John, George and Ringo. Once she went as cousin It.
I was not as Princess orientated as my DD is because I didn’t watch as much princess crap.
This is my gripe with Disney princesses, and Spiderman, or any other corporate/commercial character that's out there. Parents are the gatekeepers, kids don't have a biological need/desire to dress like a Disney princess or Batman, and posters who don't acknowledge this are annoying. Sure, your kid will grow out of it, but how did your kid grow into it?
OP is also very annoying.
Anonymous wrote:I Believe it’s what’s being sold to them, OP. It’s more the Disney culture than anything. My mom was saying that in the 1950’s there were “hobos”, ghosts, Addams Family and Munsters characters but very few Cinderella’s because they only saw Cinderella once in the theater. My mom has great pictures of herself dressed as Paul McCartney and her siblings as John, George and Ringo. Once she went as cousin It.
I was not as Princess orientated as my DD is because I didn’t watch as much princess crap.
Anonymous wrote:We really need to cancel all the princess costumes.
Anonymous wrote:Just FYI since you've clearly never seen either Frozen move. Elsa is some mystical immortal Earth spirit with magic powers that control the elements. And Elsa and Anna are both rulers (i.e., Queens, not princesses) that manage trade relationships with neighboring kingdoms and are leaders that have the loyalty of the people they rule. I don't love Disney, and I didn't love the princess phase, but you've CLEARLY never seen those movies and are just making assumptions based on Disney from a generation ago. Hate on the consumerism and whatever other hundred things that are hateable about Disney, but for Pete's sakes, at least see the movies before you judge so harshly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I a bad person that I have a visceral reaction when I see girls in traditional princess costumes? If they’re non-traditional like Mulan or Leia (ie people who actually DO something) I’m okay with it. Even the Frozen princesses who are so popular nowadays seem to just exist to be blonde and pretty. Btw I have a 5yo and so far we’ve been doing creative/neutral costumes like doctor or monkey, but she’s starting to get influenced by her K classmates :-/
I don’t think you are a bad person, but it is bad. You may want to think about getting therapy to understand why it bothers you so much.
Oh I know why it bothers me - because I respect (and want DD to emulate) people who do things rather than people who are just pretty. Same reason I prefer Elena Kagan to Kim Kardashian. But yes, I should recognize it’s a phase, likely fueled by peer pressure, and has little bearing on future interests.
Newsflash OP. Sometimes pretty women can "do things" too. Kim Kardashian is actually not just pretty. She's gotten super involved in criminal justice issues and has accomplished a lot. To use your own example.
What you are doing is judging women based on their appearance and interests and assuming they bring nothing else to the table other than those things. Which is a you problem and probably some internalized misogyny.
Ya think? Didn't notice SuperMom OP here judging little boys that dress up as Storm Troopers or famous serial killers: it's just the girls who need professionally aspirational and at MOST moderately attractive interests.
Agreed. Liberal feminist mom of two daughters who dressed in pretty and feminine costumes this year. Get over yourself, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I a bad person that I have a visceral reaction when I see girls in traditional princess costumes? If they’re non-traditional like Mulan or Leia (ie people who actually DO something) I’m okay with it. Even the Frozen princesses who are so popular nowadays seem to just exist to be blonde and pretty. Btw I have a 5yo and so far we’ve been doing creative/neutral costumes like doctor or monkey, but she’s starting to get influenced by her K classmates :-/
I don’t think you are a bad person, but it is bad. You may want to think about getting therapy to understand why it bothers you so much.
Oh I know why it bothers me - because I respect (and want DD to emulate) people who do things rather than people who are just pretty. Same reason I prefer Elena Kagan to Kim Kardashian. But yes, I should recognize it’s a phase, likely fueled by peer pressure, and has little bearing on future interests.
Newsflash OP. Sometimes pretty women can "do things" too. Kim Kardashian is actually not just pretty. She's gotten super involved in criminal justice issues and has accomplished a lot. To use your own example.
What you are doing is judging women based on their appearance and interests and assuming they bring nothing else to the table other than those things. Which is a you problem and probably some internalized misogyny.
Ya think? Didn't notice SuperMom OP here judging little boys that dress up as Storm Troopers or famous serial killers: it's just the girls who need professionally aspirational and at MOST moderately attractive interests.
Anonymous wrote:Being viscerally annoyed by little girls' interests is not as progressive as you think it is.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe that being fem negates being smart. I have my PhD in statistics, am working in my field, and love makeup and feeling ::gasp:: pretty. My daughter is 5 and loves princesses. She is also bilingual, obsessed with doing math and puzzles. So I guess, OP, you’re just not as open minded as you think you are.