Anonymous wrote:Wow - 7 pages of squabbling on this today, and very little actually thoughtful, informative, or productive. On the off-chance that could change ...
The limiting factor logistically for having the staggered start times are the number of buses required to transport everyone. That was the cost identified in the original study. One thing that could be advocated for is increased public transportation during HS/MS start and end times, possibly with "express" buses that have limited stops and additional routes that mimic some of the current school bus runs. As the county's density has increased, the public transportation hasn't kept up. In the long run, it is in the interests of the county to encourage working adults to use public transit, and if students learn to use public transit while in HS/MS, they are more likely to continue using it. Downcounty and along the 270 corridor (355, Great Seneca hwy, Midcounty hwy) from Rockville to Gaithersburg to Germantown to Clarksburg should all have a strong bus network that could serve to get MS and HS students to and from school. If the school buses were reserved for the less dense and more rural areas, you could at least have the HS start time go later to be the same as MS start (8:15a-3:00p). If enough students can take public transit, it might be possible to shift some elementary schools to the 8:15a start time too, and maybe get rid of the late ES tier.
I think that's the next most feasible step in this adjustment process.
Anonymous wrote:Wow - 7 pages of squabbling on this today, and very little actually thoughtful, informative, or productive. On the off-chance that could change ...
The limiting factor logistically for having the staggered start times are the number of buses required to transport everyone. That was the cost identified in the original study. One thing that could be advocated for is increased public transportation during HS/MS start and end times, possibly with "express" buses that have limited stops and additional routes that mimic some of the current school bus runs. As the county's density has increased, the public transportation hasn't kept up. In the long run, it is in the interests of the county to encourage working adults to use public transit, and if students learn to use public transit while in HS/MS, they are more likely to continue using it. Downcounty and along the 270 corridor (355, Great Seneca hwy, Midcounty hwy) from Rockville to Gaithersburg to Germantown to Clarksburg should all have a strong bus network that could serve to get MS and HS students to and from school. If the school buses were reserved for the less dense and more rural areas, you could at least have the HS start time go later to be the same as MS start (8:15a-3:00p). If enough students can take public transit, it might be possible to shift some elementary schools to the 8:15a start time too, and maybe get rid of the late ES tier.
I think that's the next most feasible step in this adjustment process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well put. One of the things the MCPS report found was that low-income families said they'd have an easier time getting beforecare than aftercare.
Where does it say that in the report? Why would it be easier to obtain before school care than after for lower income families?
DP. I looked in the report (search on "before"), and I didn't find it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well put. One of the things the MCPS report found was that low-income families said they'd have an easier time getting beforecare than aftercare.
Where does it say that in the report? Why would it be easier to obtain before school care than after for lower income families?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So who's going to pay for all the new busses and drivers to make sure these start times are convenient for you?
The last report showed the cost at 2-3M per annum. The 2022 operating budget is 2.71B.
That's 0.10%
So diversity busing wouldn't be a big expense?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought it worked pretty well to have everyone on the same 9 am start schedule last Spring during hybrid learning. I don't think the cost of buses should be the determinative factor. The HS commute could be a longer for some of the older siblings responsible for childcare, but, except for the youngest ES kids, 15-20 minutes alone should not be a huge problem. Put in free aftercare for K-2.
Where does the money come from for that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably includes working parents of young children who’d rather not have to cover another hour of childcare in the afternoon. High school athletes who get home late enough as it is already. High school students with after school jobs. Is that enough imbeciles for you?
Not to mention all of the families that rely on older siblings for childcare. That was a major factor in the 2015 report if I recall correctly. Between older siblings providing care, and kids who needed money from after-school jobs, the later start time was going to have a severe effect on the financial well-being of some of the most vulnerable families in the district.
I've never understood this argument. I am sure there are *some* families who use their older children for daycare in the afternoons. Likewise, I am sure there are *some* families who have to have morning care because of the late elementary start time, who otherwise wouldn't have to pay for morning care. I don't know who all these working families are that are able to hang around the house until 9:00 to get their first grader to school.
Well put. One of the things the MCPS report found was that low-income families said they'd have an easier time getting beforecare than aftercare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So who's going to pay for all the new busses and drivers to make sure these start times are convenient for you?
The last report showed the cost at 2-3M per annum. The 2022 operating budget is 2.71B.
That's 0.10%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, ladies, enough already. The science is in:
https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/features/schools-start-too-early.html
This staggering of start times is 100% bass-ackwards.
Board of Education Approves Later School Start Times
Level Time Length of Day
High School 7:45 a.m.–2:30 p.m. 6 hours, 45 minutes
Middle School 8:15 a.m.–3:00 p.m. 6 hours, 45 minutes
Elementary School Tier 1 9:00 a.m.–3:25 p.m. 6 hours, 25 minutes
Elementary School Tier 2 9:25 a.m.–3:50 p.m. 6 hours, 25 minutes
This post is unique in that I both agree that school should start later but I also find your tone so douchey that I'll have to refrain from agreeing with you.
Forget about it, Jake, it's DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seriously, ladies, enough already. The science is in:
https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/features/schools-start-too-early.html
This staggering of start times is 100% bass-ackwards.
Board of Education Approves Later School Start Times
Level Time Length of Day
High School 7:45 a.m.–2:30 p.m. 6 hours, 45 minutes
Middle School 8:15 a.m.–3:00 p.m. 6 hours, 45 minutes
Elementary School Tier 1 9:00 a.m.–3:25 p.m. 6 hours, 25 minutes
Elementary School Tier 2 9:25 a.m.–3:50 p.m. 6 hours, 25 minutes
This post is unique in that I both agree that school should start later but I also find your tone so douchey that I'll have to refrain from agreeing with you.
Anonymous wrote:I’m all for starting HS later but I do wonder if they could even hire the bus drivers to cover, even assuming they bought all the extra buses—they have such a shortage now. It’s such a crappy job that I’m not sure it’s even fixable with higher pay. The pay and benefits aren’t bad—our former nanny applied for the job and we did the reference for her—but the tests and background checks are really extensive. And, really, there’s not enough money in the world to make me drive a school bus full of rowdy children in MoCo traffic—I don’t even like driving carpool in my minivan!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Like I said, the science is pretty clear that sending High School students to school at 7:45 is damaging. At the bare minimum the start times should be reversed. HS students should start at 9, elementary schoolers at 7:45. As far as after school jobs and sports, I would think that education and student's mental health should be the priority here.
I was taught younger kids need more sleep. I would rather a high schooler start early than ES. My high school started at 8, but I think all the levels started around the same time.