Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 11:18     Subject: Epstein Files
More background on Les Wexner and Epstein and their connections in case anyone needs to get up to speed.

Gift article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/business/jeffrey-epstein-wexner-victorias-secret.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LFA.rCjl.UDOXnUZF0Xtc&smid=url-share
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:58     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Les Wexner is an unindicted co-conspirator.




Wexner is supposed to testify in front of Congress on Wednesday 2/18. There really should be a Polymarket on whether Wexner is alive on 2/18.


They need to start from the top and look at the elites who funded and pulled the strings. Les Wexner + Mega Group + Rothschilds (who were mentioned close to 11,000 times). That would make the most sense.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:55     Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Les Wexner is an unindicted co-conspirator.




Wexner is supposed to testify in front of Congress on Wednesday 2/18. There really should be a Polymarket on whether Wexner is alive on 2/18.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:48     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My place of work that is a little trumpy and never talks politics.. someone was talking about all this yesterday. Keep going everyone!!


Similar story with a SAHM and her closer circle. First political thing to break through.


And/or it is becoming clear that now is the last chance to jump ship and save face. This is certainly at the point where one can be outraged and do an about-face.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:45     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Listening to a lot of POTUS radio and both sides are saying the emails prove some powerful people did bad things but they also prove Epstein was not running a trafficking ring. Is that really true?


From what I’m seeing, the sex trafficking ring may not be as widespread as previously thought—he seems to mostly have trafficked children for his personal, insatiable use—but he definitely did traffic children

Here’s just one example:



FTFY.

I don’t know how you can say on the one hand that the trafficking ring was not widespread and then link to a tweet about a wealthy and powerful person half way around the world being involved.


Agree. We have testimony from a small fraction of the 1000 victims, and within that testimony there are at least a dozen instances of trafficking a minor for sexual abuse. Add in the experiences of the hundreds of others and there's likely at least hundreds of instances of trafficking a minor (or a woman, which is also a crime) for sexual abuse.


Those are just the victims that were documented. How many were used, killed, and dumped? Those victims will not be in any files or emails, they will have never provided testimony or spoken with law enforcement. They were very likely foreign teens or young adults from poor countries.

There's so much more that we won't known. The Known Unknowns.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:34     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:My place of work that is a little trumpy and never talks politics.. someone was talking about all this yesterday. Keep going everyone!!


Similar story with a SAHM and her closer circle. First political thing to break through.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:33     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.


To his credit,?! You are crazy.

I think the ^PP was being sarcastic.


Yes. Yes I was. We all hate Epstein, Trump, Maxwell, and anyone else who participated in and / or covered up these crimes. But tone doesn't come across on the internet.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:30     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Looks like Epstein perps are catching heat in every country except the US.


This is why the American public needs to request an international court of law. There will never be justice here.


ICC/ICJ are useless and the US doesn't acknowledge their decisions.


Would a tribunal brought on this cabal work?


The US system of justice is the one that we need to rely on here. And also the court of public opinion. The Congress can impeach him even if the statute of limitations has passed.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:29     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.


To his credit,?! You are crazy.

I think the ^PP was being sarcastic.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:29     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.

This just means he knew about it all these years but failed to alert any state or federal authorities.


Right. But it's better than the hundreds of others who knew about it and didn't alert any state or federal employees.


I guess you are memory-holing that Trump was/is one of the traffickers.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:28     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Looks like Epstein perps are catching heat in every country except the US.


This is why the American public needs to request an international court of law. There will never be justice here.


ICC/ICJ are useless and the US doesn't acknowledge their decisions.


Would a tribunal brought on this cabal work?
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:28     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.


To his credit,?! You are crazy.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:28     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.

This just means he knew about it all these years but failed to alert any state or federal authorities.


Right. But it's better than the hundreds of others who knew about it and didn't alert any state or federal employees.


Oh wait, are we trying to go back to the olden days in which we pretend that Trump isn’t a kid diddler?

That’s not going to fly anymore.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:20     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:But to Trump's credit, he did call the local police to inform on Epstein twice, when he was mad at him about other things.

This just means he knew about it all these years but failed to alert any state or federal authorities.


Right. But it's better than the hundreds of others who knew about it and didn't alert any state or federal employees.
Anonymous
Post 02/10/2026 10:17     Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Listening to a lot of POTUS radio and both sides are saying the emails prove some powerful people did bad things but they also prove Epstein was not running a trafficking ring. Is that really true?


From what I’m seeing, the sex trafficking ring may not be as widespread as previously thought—he seems to mostly have trafficked women for his personal, insatiable use—but he definitely did traffic women.

Here’s just one example:



Did you really just say that trafficking wasn’t widespread and then post the trafficking of two girls/women?!

🤦🏼‍♀️