Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what % of the actual voting public in their district signed the petition? How many of them would never vote for Tholen or Cohen anyway?Anonymous wrote:What embattled Tholen and Cohen fail to recognize is that the recall petitions, even if impeded by local Democratic prosecutors (or, more accurately, non-prosecutors), are a giant vote of “no confidence” in their continued service on the School Board. Both should take a cue from Beth Barts in Loudoun and resign.
The petition bar is far lower than the number of people who regularly vote against them. It should be easy to for conservatives to get 10% of voters to sign a petition. The fact that they have trouble meeting that low bar shows you how little trouble the board is actually in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what % of the actual voting public in their district signed the petition? How many of them would never vote for Tholen or Cohen anyway?Anonymous wrote:What embattled Tholen and Cohen fail to recognize is that the recall petitions, even if impeded by local Democratic prosecutors (or, more accurately, non-prosecutors), are a giant vote of “no confidence” in their continued service on the School Board. Both should take a cue from Beth Barts in Loudoun and resign.
The petition bar is far lower than the number of people who regularly vote against them. It should be easy to for conservatives to get 10% of voters to sign a petition. The fact that they have trouble meeting that low bar shows you how little trouble the board is actually in.
Anonymous wrote:what % of the actual voting public in their district signed the petition? How many of them would never vote for Tholen or Cohen anyway?Anonymous wrote:What embattled Tholen and Cohen fail to recognize is that the recall petitions, even if impeded by local Democratic prosecutors (or, more accurately, non-prosecutors), are a giant vote of “no confidence” in their continued service on the School Board. Both should take a cue from Beth Barts in Loudoun and resign.
what % of the actual voting public in their district signed the petition? How many of them would never vote for Tholen or Cohen anyway?Anonymous wrote:What embattled Tholen and Cohen fail to recognize is that the recall petitions, even if impeded by local Democratic prosecutors (or, more accurately, non-prosecutors), are a giant vote of “no confidence” in their continued service on the School Board. Both should take a cue from Beth Barts in Loudoun and resign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I may have just triggered the Merritt Garland Memo Alert ? My post was deleted - maybe I am now a domestic terrorist? Or maybe it was just a website glitch?
Or maybe tholen called her new bff James Hingeley and he had it removed?
Or maybe tholen dropped another $2344 into Steve Descano's campaign coffers and he stepped in?
Repeating it here to see what happens:
We will not stop, not remain quiet, nor step aside and let these elected officials on the school board continue to fail our kids. Instead we will remain relentless as we tirelessly confront these board members with their poor decisions and repeated failures, and we will not stop until we vote them out of office.
Merritt - just to clarify, we have the right to do the above in line with a little something we like to call the First Amendment. It goes something like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[u][/i]
I listened to a podcast recently about how dissatisfaction with school boards have become a major tool to push far right ideas. When you say I’m unhappy with the SB, I wish they made different decisions—-I get that. That’s ok. That’s normal.
But some of the cuckoo ideas-like so and so is censoring me because they are part of this big conspiracy. Like really? The amount of threads with the words “leftists” and other right wing lingo on the FCPS forum is mind boggling. I miss the silly gen Ed. Vs. AAP, which school is best arguments, etc. It was more productive than this crap.
The school board allowed books in libraries that have explicit drawings in them - you cant post these drawings to websites of newspapers as they delete them because they are too explicit but it is ok because it is an LGBT issue. The board is trying to increase the number of black students at TJ because there are not enough, and there are too many Asians (Im Asian American and take great offense to this). Kids are reading books about how white people all had it easy and should feel guilt - sure there is no class called CRT, but CRT is woven throughout all classes. The boundary favored Elaine's wealthy, elite friends in Great Falls. The board was renaming schools instead of pushing the teachers union to accept the fact that they had to return to the classroom.
These are all LEFT agenda items. This is the left-ist agenda playing out in front of us.
Where are the centrists in the Democratic party? Why arent they pushing against this?
And by the way, Merritt Garland admitted that the FBI tags certain parents who are considered aggressive in the FBI system.
So what are you doing about this? Stop complaining about those who are fighting against it and join the fight. Do something other than make excuses for the board.
The bolded statement is certainly true.
It only is part of the "left-ist agenda" to the extent that Elaine gets away with it because she trades favors with other members; they'll go along with egregiously favoring her own community (Great Falls) as long as she supports their pet projects like Keys Gamarra's Lewis Academy and Karl Frisch's dog park rescue mission.
She needs to be replaced on the Board, as do almost all of the other corrupt, hypocritical members. Megan can stay, if she wants to, because she was better on getting schools opened though really just as bad on everything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I may have just triggered the Merritt Garland Memo Alert ? My post was deleted - maybe I am now a domestic terrorist? Or maybe it was just a website glitch?
Or maybe tholen called her new bff James Hingeley and he had it removed?
Or maybe tholen dropped another $2344 into Steve Descano's campaign coffers and he stepped in?
Repeating it here to see what happens:
We will not stop, not remain quiet, nor step aside and let these elected officials on the school board continue to fail our kids. Instead we will remain relentless as we tirelessly confront these board members with their poor decisions and repeated failures, and we will not stop until we vote them out of office.
Merritt - just to clarify, we have the right to do the above in line with a little something we like to call the First Amendment. It goes something like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[u][/i]
I listened to a podcast recently about how dissatisfaction with school boards have become a major tool to push far right ideas. When you say I’m unhappy with the SB, I wish they made different decisions—-I get that. That’s ok. That’s normal.
But some of the cuckoo ideas-like so and so is censoring me because they are part of this big conspiracy. Like really? The amount of threads with the words “leftists” and other right wing lingo on the FCPS forum is mind boggling. I miss the silly gen Ed. Vs. AAP, which school is best arguments, etc. It was more productive than this crap.
The school board allowed books in libraries that have explicit drawings in them - you cant post these drawings to websites of newspapers as they delete them because they are too explicit but it is ok because it is an LGBT issue. The board is trying to increase the number of black students at TJ because there are not enough, and there are too many Asians (Im Asian American and take great offense to this). Kids are reading books about how white people all had it easy and should feel guilt - sure there is no class called CRT, but CRT is woven throughout all classes. The boundary favored Elaine's wealthy, elite friends in Great Falls. The board was renaming schools instead of pushing the teachers union to accept the fact that they had to return to the classroom.
These are all LEFT agenda items. This is the left-ist agenda playing out in front of us.
Where are the centrists in the Democratic party? Why arent they pushing against this?
And by the way, Merritt Garland admitted that the FBI tags certain parents who are considered aggressive in the FBI system.
So what are you doing about this? Stop complaining about those who are fighting against it and join the fight. Do something other than make excuses for the board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I may have just triggered the Merritt Garland Memo Alert ? My post was deleted - maybe I am now a domestic terrorist? Or maybe it was just a website glitch?
Or maybe tholen called her new bff James Hingeley and he had it removed?
Or maybe tholen dropped another $2344 into Steve Descano's campaign coffers and he stepped in?
Repeating it here to see what happens:
We will not stop, not remain quiet, nor step aside and let these elected officials on the school board continue to fail our kids. Instead we will remain relentless as we tirelessly confront these board members with their poor decisions and repeated failures, and we will not stop until we vote them out of office.
Merritt - just to clarify, we have the right to do the above in line with a little something we like to call the First Amendment. It goes something like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[u][/i]
I listened to a podcast recently about how dissatisfaction with school boards have become a major tool to push far right ideas. When you say I’m unhappy with the SB, I wish they made different decisions—-I get that. That’s ok. That’s normal.
But some of the cuckoo ideas-like so and so is censoring me because they are part of this big conspiracy. Like really? The amount of threads with the words “leftists” and other right wing lingo on the FCPS forum is mind boggling. I miss the silly gen Ed. Vs. AAP, which school is best arguments, etc. It was more productive than this crap.
Anonymous wrote:So question. There is no guarantee when you buy a property that boundaries will not change. I’m def against busing. That makes no sense. But boundary changes have always been on the realm of possibilities. With this school board and past ones. Sometimes it is necessary based on numbers. What is the argument against it besides property values? Bc honestly maintaining property values should not be the priority for the school system.
Anonymous wrote:If I may add some context and perspective.
If FCPS is talking about potentially rezoning your neighborhood, then it is already too late. They've made their decisions, and your kids are now just pawns in their rezoing game. Sure, there will be public meetings, time for comment, maps, websites for public input, easels that you can write your feelings on, but in the end, the decision is already made. If you think the board will listen to you, then you are dreaming. Sure go ahead and appeal to the board members. Let them know that they should not divide your community, tell them it is unfair to you and more importantly, your kids. Plead with them. Meet privately with them, put your kids in front of them...have at it. You are already done. If you want to, bring them data - real data - not the 'platenberg's pretend make-believe numbers' -- it makes no difference. They dont care. You can even see what their new boundary consultant says (i.e. the consultant who is paid by FCPS at the direction of the board)....
Get ready to be lied to, manipulated, and have last minute changes without opportunity for comment. Get ready for special interests - the groups/neighborhoods with the most influence (money) - to direct the actions of your board member.
This is called the ELAINE THOLEN MODEL.
If you think anyone on the board will care about your kids, just remember, Elaine the Pain pushed through a boundary change, switching 30 kids out of 2300 to a new pyramid in the middle of a pandemic. How do you think they will treat your kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I may have just triggered the Merritt Garland Memo Alert ? My post was deleted - maybe I am now a domestic terrorist? Or maybe it was just a website glitch?
Or maybe tholen called her new bff James Hingeley and he had it removed?
Or maybe tholen dropped another $2344 into Steve Descano's campaign coffers and he stepped in?
Repeating it here to see what happens:
We will not stop, not remain quiet, nor step aside and let these elected officials on the school board continue to fail our kids. Instead we will remain relentless as we tirelessly confront these board members with their poor decisions and repeated failures, and we will not stop until we vote them out of office.
Merritt - just to clarify, we have the right to do the above in line with a little something we like to call the First Amendment. It goes something like this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[u][/i]
I listened to a podcast recently about how dissatisfaction with school boards have become a major tool to push far right ideas. When you say I’m unhappy with the SB, I wish they made different decisions—-I get that. That’s ok. That’s normal.
But some of the cuckoo ideas-like so and so is censoring me because they are part of this big conspiracy. Like really? The amount of threads with the words “leftists” and other right wing lingo on the FCPS forum is mind boggling. I miss the silly gen Ed. Vs. AAP, which school is best arguments, etc. It was more productive than this crap.
Anonymous wrote:So question. There is no guarantee when you buy a property that boundaries will not change. I’m def against busing. That makes no sense. But boundary changes have always been on the realm of possibilities. With this school board and past ones. Sometimes it is necessary based on numbers. What is the argument against it besides property values? Bc honestly maintaining property values should not be the priority for the school system.