It’s not that I think Britney isn’t lovable…but I’m convinced he’s after her for her money.
Wouldn’t you think the same about any guy that tried to marry her?
Not necessarily. But an "actor/dancer" more than a decade younger? Absolutely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not that I think Britney isn’t lovable…but I’m convinced he’s after her for her money.
Wouldn’t you think the same about any guy that tried to marry her?
Anonymous wrote:It’s not that I think Britney isn’t lovable…but I’m convinced he’s after her for her money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?
Because she’s engaged not married.
Come on, people. It's in selfie mode, the image is flipped.
your e-ring is always on your left hand, doofus
Not sure about selfie mode, but I'll look again
Earlier PP - I mistyped right hand married, left hand engaged. (This is what happens when you never wear your rings.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mervisdiamond.com/blog/2014/01/how-to-wear-your-engagement-ring-and-wedding-ring/amp/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?
Because she’s engaged not married.
Come on, people. It's in selfie mode, the image is flipped.
your e-ring is always on your left hand, doofus
Not sure about selfie mode, but I'll look again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?
Because she’s engaged not married.
Come on, people. It's in selfie mode, the image is flipped.
your e-ring is always on your left hand, doofus
Not sure about selfie mode, but I'll look again
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?
Because she’s engaged not married.
Come on, people. It's in selfie mode, the image is flipped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This feels so shady - he just couldn’t wait to get the ball rolling on locking her and her $$$ down.
+100
Free Brittany people could be the future Protect Britnany movement.
There's no way to 'Protect' Brittany from her husband. All he wants is $50,000 a month in spousal and child support. And he'll get it as soon as she pops out those babies in 2022. Then he'll go away with his 18-year plan secured.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's not emotionally and mentally stable. Is she a great dancer and entertainer? Yes. Is she extremely pretty with a great figure? Yes. Does she probably love her sons? Yes. Nonetheless, she has significant issues.
Those aren't facts, and I have to disagree with all of them.
That said, she does seem like a kind person and I hope her life turns out better than many people fear it will.
I also hope her life turns out well. But I fear for her.
The dude is clearly Kevin Federlining her. He didn't even wait 48 hours from the time her father announced the end of his conservatorship to put a ring on her finger.
If she's stupid enough to get played have at it. Her father and family tried so hard to protect her. But social media vilified them and we tried to tell you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?
Because she’s engaged not married.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This feels so shady - he just couldn’t wait to get the ball rolling on locking her and her $$$ down.
+100
Free Brittany people could be the future Protect Britnany movement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's not emotionally and mentally stable. Is she a great dancer and entertainer? Yes. Is she extremely pretty with a great figure? Yes. Does she probably love her sons? Yes. Nonetheless, she has significant issues.
Those aren't facts, and I have to disagree with all of them.
That said, she does seem like a kind person and I hope her life turns out better than many people fear it will.
I also hope her life turns out well. But I fear for her.
Anonymous wrote:Why is the ring on her right hand?