Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I was predisposed to at least like her even if I don't agree with her judicial point of view, but I am heartily sick and tired of Saint Amy.
She can't express and opinion on whether the President has the absolute authority to pardon HIMSELF? Ben Sasse asks her a Constitutional law softball and she flails around? "Forgotten" disclosures about her record keep trickling out? She was also a part of the Bush recount? Come on.
She's a bought and paid for Federalist Society stooge. These hearings are an embarrassment and an insult to the public's intelligence.
You would be saying exactly the same thing about anyone Trump nominated, period. Nothing new under the sun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I know right, poor women dying of abortions is our jam! Bring on the popcorn!
I am sure pp is a white male, they are the only ones happy about this.
Wow, you REALLY need to get out more. I’m the PP and a pro-choice woman. I take justices at their word when they swear to be impartial interpreters of the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ PP is correct. I'm a right leaning independent and I think that the nomination should have waited until after the election. However, Senate Dems asking her questions they know she shouldn't answer and criticizing her when she doesn't because they don't like that she was nominated at all is distasteful.
I found it really distasteful that she was unaware that the constitution sets the date for voting for elections. But considering Thom Tillis said Election Day was November 11, and nobody corrected him, maybe the COVID was frying everyone’s brains...
Really? That's your big takeaway from this? Here's something that will blow your mind. The law is written in books so that we don't have to memorize it and can consult it when we have to analyze a particular issue.
- DCUM lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many ACB shills here. No classes at ND? Its quite striking the amount of support for her on this thread.
You mean it’s quite striking that there are actually people who disagree with you? Maybe step out of your very narrow bubble occasionally.
Pro-death of mother lifers? I don’t know many like you, thankfully. I will pray for your daughters.
PP here and I’m pro-choice. But I think it’s disgusting how Democrats like you have smeared this woman for her personal beliefs. And that you’re fear mongering that somehow she will attempt to overturn Roe. She won’t. And you know it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I was predisposed to at least like her even if I don't agree with her judicial point of view, but I am heartily sick and tired of Saint Amy.
She can't express and opinion on whether the President has the absolute authority to pardon HIMSELF? Ben Sasse asks her a Constitutional law softball and she flails around? "Forgotten" disclosures about her record keep trickling out? She was also a part of the Bush recount? Come on.
She's a bought and paid for Federalist Society stooge. These hearings are an embarrassment and an insult to the public's intelligence.
You would be saying exactly the same thing about anyone Trump nominated, period. Nothing new under the sun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The confirmation is going swimmingly well, thank you. Within a week, ACB will be another outstanding scotus judge thanks to President Trump!
+1
It is so entertaining watching these poor liberal schlubs try to discredit ACB. They wouldn’t last five minutes in a debate against her.
Is there any evidence in her record that indicates she would be any good at debating? I will try my hand at a moot court against her. We write our own briefs - no law clerks, and she argues as an appellate lawyer in front of a panel chosen by the ABA. She's never even tried a case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I know right, poor women dying of abortions is our jam! Bring on the popcorn!
I am sure pp is a white male, they are the only ones happy about this.
Wow, you REALLY need to get out more. I’m the PP and a pro-choice woman. I take justices at their word when they swear to be impartial interpreters of the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The confirmation is going swimmingly well, thank you. Within a week, ACB will be another outstanding scotus judge thanks to President Trump!
+1
It is so entertaining watching these poor liberal schlubs try to discredit ACB. They wouldn’t last five minutes in a debate against her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ PP is correct. I'm a right leaning independent and I think that the nomination should have waited until after the election. However, Senate Dems asking her questions they know she shouldn't answer and criticizing her when she doesn't because they don't like that she was nominated at all is distasteful.
I found it really distasteful that she was unaware that the constitution sets the date for voting for elections. But considering Thom Tillis said Election Day was November 11, and nobody corrected him, maybe the COVID was frying everyone’s brains...
Really? That's your big takeaway from this? Here's something that will blow your mind. The law is written in books so that we don't have to memorize it and can consult it when we have to analyze a particular issue.
- DCUM lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I was predisposed to at least like her even if I don't agree with her judicial point of view, but I am heartily sick and tired of Saint Amy.
She can't express and opinion on whether the President has the absolute authority to pardon HIMSELF? Ben Sasse asks her a Constitutional law softball and she flails around? "Forgotten" disclosures about her record keep trickling out? She was also a part of the Bush recount? Come on.
She's a bought and paid for Federalist Society stooge. These hearings are an embarrassment and an insult to the public's intelligence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ PP is correct. I'm a right leaning independent and I think that the nomination should have waited until after the election. However, Senate Dems asking her questions they know she shouldn't answer and criticizing her when she doesn't because they don't like that she was nominated at all is distasteful.
I found it really distasteful that she was unaware that the constitution sets the date for voting for elections. But considering Thom Tillis said Election Day was November 11, and nobody corrected him, maybe the COVID was frying everyone’s brains...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I know right, poor women dying of abortions is our jam! Bring on the popcorn!
I am sure pp is a white male, they are the only ones happy about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already know she’s completely amoral.
I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.
![]()
![]()
So much extremism here from the left. It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.
I know right, poor women dying of abortions is our jam! Bring on the popcorn!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The confirmation is going swimmingly well, thank you. Within a week, ACB will be another outstanding scotus judge thanks to President Trump!
+1
It is so entertaining watching these poor liberal schlubs try to discredit ACB. They wouldn’t last five minutes in a debate against her.