Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
I see that you didn't answer the question. Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016, as required by the Constitution?
No. And in so doing, Mitch showed that it's not actually required. It had just always been done.
I hate Mitch. But he knows what he's doing. He's a piece of shit, but he's smart and effective for himself and a few others.
I'm not convinced of this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
I see that you didn't answer the question. Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016, as required by the Constitution?
No. And in so doing, Mitch showed that it's not actually required. It had just always been done.
I hate Mitch. But he knows what he's doing. He's a piece of shit, but he's smart and effective for himself and a few others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
I see that you didn't answer the question. Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016, as required by the Constitution?
No. And in so doing, Mitch showed that it's not actually required. It had just always been done.
I hate Mitch. But he knows what he's doing. He's a piece of shit, but he's smart and effective for himself and a few others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
President Trump and Senate Republicans promised to confirm well-qualified, conservative judges and justices to the federal courts. We should continue to fulfill this promise and our constitutional duty for all vacancies as long as we are in office. I look forward to consideration of the President’s nominee by the full Senate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
I see that you didn't answer the question. Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016, as required by the Constitution?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
What is the remedy for their dereliction of duty, other than the voters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
There is no right to vote in the Constitution. That's the Electoral College at work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
I think the Senate has a duty to advise and consent to the nominees, meaning they need to work with the President to find a nominee acceptable to all parties. It's the only thing that doesn't result in absurd scenarios like an empty Supreme Court.
Did the Senate advise Obama in 2016?
Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP
Anonymous wrote:"But, in your view, it would be Constitutional for the Senate to allow the court to run out of justices? If McConnell's actions are Constitutional, then having an empty Supreme Court would also be Constitutional."
Explain what the remedy is, other than the voters. NP