Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Since always.

Oh? Let’s ask Kelly herself.

"I regret a lot of what I've said," Kelly said. "I mean you're going to be on the air several hours a week live television, you're going to say stupid (expletive). That's just the reality you know, so yeah there's a lot I'd like to go back and say differently."

Takes integrityto admit that. Solid journalist.

At this point, Reade is going to have to provide a CCTV to be believed. There are simply too many holes and changes in her story, and in her collaborators’ stories. Too many tweets praising Biden on women’s’ issues. A personal history that’s a little too illustrative of grift and deceit. She can’t walk all this stuff back without new, bullet-proof evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pretty comprehensive

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/7/21248713/tara-reade-joe-biden-sexual-assault-accusation

Definitely worth reading. This reporter and others tried to verify the story for a year and weren't able to do so. Now Reade has changed her account and suggested new corroborators that she did not mention to reporters a year ago.

In April 2019: Reade told me that she wanted me to think of this story as being about abuse of power, “but not sexual misconduct.” Her emphasis was on how she was treated in Biden’s office by Senate aides, who she said retaliated against her for complaining about how Biden touched her in meetings. “I don’t know if [Biden] knew why I left,” she said. “He barely knew us by name.”

The problem is that it is hard to tell if Reade is making truthful allegations or just making arguments for a political soapbox. She is creating a narrative and she is about as reliable and trustworthy as the two political operatives on the last page. Her goal is not the truth; her goal is to overthrow the will of the Democratic electorate and remove Biden from the Democratic nomination so that a more progressive candidate can be selected.

Anonymous wrote:This is pretty comprehensive

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/7/21248713/tara-reade-joe-biden-sexual-assault-accusation

Definitely worth reading. This reporter and others tried to verify the story for a year and weren't able to do so. Now Reade has changed her account and suggested new corroborators that she did not mention to reporters a year ago.

In April 2019: Reade told me that she wanted me to think of this story as being about abuse of power, “but not sexual misconduct.” Her emphasis was on how she was treated in Biden’s office by Senate aides, who she said retaliated against her for complaining about how Biden touched her in meetings. “I don’t know if [Biden] knew why I left,” she said. “He barely knew us by name.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is pretty comprehensive

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/7/21248713/tara-reade-joe-biden-sexual-assault-accusation

In which one of Reade’s friends says she changed her story.

Her brother changed his story within the timespan of a week.

Anonymous wrote:This is pretty comprehensive

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/7/21248713/tara-reade-joe-biden-sexual-assault-accusation

In which one of Reade’s friends says she changed her story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Since always.

Oh? Let’s ask Kelly herself.

"I regret a lot of what I've said," Kelly said. "I mean you're going to be on the air several hours a week live television, you're going to say stupid (expletive). That's just the reality you know, so yeah there's a lot I'd like to go back and say differently."

She was probably referring to the Black Santa Claus. That does not reflect on her integrity.

Really? You say “a lot” when you’re referring to one thing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Since always.

Oh? Let’s ask Kelly herself.

"I regret a lot of what I've said," Kelly said. "I mean you're going to be on the air several hours a week live television, you're going to say stupid (expletive). That's just the reality you know, so yeah there's a lot I'd like to go back and say differently."

She was probably referring to the Black Santa Claus. That does not reflect on her integrity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Since always.

Oh? Let’s ask Kelly herself.

"I regret a lot of what I've said," Kelly said. "I mean you're going to be on the air several hours a week live television, you're going to say stupid (expletive). That's just the reality you know, so yeah there's a lot I'd like to go back and say differently."

This is pretty comprehensive

https://www.vox.com/2020/5/7/21248713/tara-reade-joe-biden-sexual-assault-accusation

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Since always.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Since when?

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.

Her integrity cannot be questioned.

Yes, Megyn Kelly, that reputable newscaster.