Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Code section, please?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

Google it. Really this isn't hard.

EU hails sacking of Ukraine’s prosecutor Viktor Shokin
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190?mode=amp

IMF Demand For Ukraine Reform Just Latest Red Flag For Poroshenko
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-imf-demand-poroshenko-corruption/27545849.html

Anticorruption campaigners point to the controversial appointment in February 2014, at the height of the Euromaidan furor, of sexagenarian Prosecutor-General Viktor Shokin.

Shokin previously served in the same post under Presidents Leonid Kuchma and Viktor Yushchenko, and in his new tenure has proposed a number of Yanukovych-era holdovers for key functions, making him the ultimate political insider in the eyes of critics.

Poroshenko has ignored repeated calls to sack Shokin, including from more than 100 members of parliament.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Above poster: could you please provide the link that other leaders called for Shokin's removal?

Google it. Really this isn't hard.

EU hails sacking of Ukraine’s prosecutor Viktor Shokin
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190?mode=amp

Anonymous wrote:Is fomenting a civil war impeachable?

Asking for a friend.

Let’s go the law:

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USC 2383.


Survey says....YES!

Is fomenting a civil war impeachable?

Asking for a friend.

So with a bounty on the head of the whistleblower and a president broadcasting a warning about civil war, Republicans stand by, silent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Fox News has learned that the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council were “unanimous” in supporting the aid to Ukraine, and that Trump acted alone in withholding the aid over the summer.”

Uh, we already knew both of those facts.

But good for Fox for catching up.

“Ugh, guys, the Trump train is rolling off a cliff, let’s start doing some journalism now.

Quick, what did everybody learn last week???”

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

Ironically, one need not commit a crime to be impeached. But since you ask, he is subverting his oath to office, bribery, extortion, RICO/Conspiracy to defraud, aiding and abetting the violation that Rudy has committed, the list goes on.

Inciting civil war can be added to the list.

Anonymous wrote:Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

"betrayal, abuse of power, national security"

Bad as the behavior was, I get that impeachment is warranted, yes. Facts must come out, let chips fall where they may. As of now, what is the crime, as defined by United Stares Code that he is alleged to have violated?

Anonymous wrote:Rolling Thunder is no longer. Last year was the last one.

No, they will ride again. They've found new leaders/sponsors in Amvets.

Anonymous wrote:“Fox News has learned that the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council were “unanimous” in supporting the aid to Ukraine, and that Trump acted alone in withholding the aid over the summer.”

Uh, we already knew both of those facts.

But good for Fox for catching up.

“Fox News has learned that the Pentagon, State Department and National Security Council were “unanimous” in supporting the aid to Ukraine, and that Trump acted alone in withholding the aid over the summer.”

Rolling Thunder is no longer. Last year was the last one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would posit that an innocent person wouldn't threaten civil war, murder and treason as fallout for an impeachment inquiry.

He doesn't even have to threaten. Rolling Thunder plans a HUGE presence in DC if the President is impeached. I'm sure they will be joined by many others. You see, you can't disenfranchise people by taking away their vote with made up stories.

Bring it. See what happens.

LOL, Rolling Thunder? I mean, respect to their actual cause, but are we supposed to be intimidated by that? Surely you’re not saying that Rolling Thunder is a bunch of violent thugs who will threaten people’s personal safety if they don’t like their politics? If so, maybe we need to reconsider whether it’s safe to allow them to congregate downtown on Memorial Day.