Anonymous wrote:Families should leave DCPS
https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/early-childhood/maryland-redshirting-kindergarten-E3477RWX6ZA7HHBSY3J3UD7IEU/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my daughter’s private DC preschool, 1/3 of the children would be pushed into 1st after preschool if this rule is applied broadly. Anyone know what the principals/registrars at Key, Mann, Stoddert and Hyde are actually doing in these situations ?
I’m part of the PTO at a DCPS elementary school and our principal indicated that they have absolutely no discretion on this. As in, the computers do not give them the option to deviate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my daughter’s private DC preschool, 1/3 of the children would be pushed into 1st after preschool if this rule is applied broadly. Anyone know what the principals/registrars at Key, Mann, Stoddert and Hyde are actually doing in these situations ?
I’m part of the PTO at a DCPS elementary school and our principal indicated that they have absolutely no discretion on this. As in, the computers do not give them the option to deviate.
Anonymous wrote:In my daughter’s private DC preschool, 1/3 of the children would be pushed into 1st after preschool if this rule is applied broadly. Anyone know what the principals/registrars at Key, Mann, Stoddert and Hyde are actually doing in these situations ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/upshot/boys-kindergarten-redshirting.html
This is almost entirely predicted on the work on a centrist incel and then cites some research on both sides. It's very much not making the point you think it is.
The research cited actually seems to say that redshirted kids may gain a competitive advantage earlier and that redshirting may even lead to disadvantages in the job market.
Either way it's completely insane to basically argue an entire sex should be delayed in starting school.
This article made me wonder - do other countries have this problem? It seems like a recent and American issue (both the gender gap in school performance and redshirting itself).
Anonymous wrote:You’re calling it a preschool, but those parents essentially decided to put their 5 year olds in a private early ed for kindergarten. That was their choice, and choices have consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/upshot/boys-kindergarten-redshirting.html
This is almost entirely predicted on the work on a centrist incel and then cites some research on both sides. It's very much not making the point you think it is.
The research cited actually seems to say that redshirted kids may gain a competitive advantage earlier and that redshirting may even lead to disadvantages in the job market.
Either way it's completely insane to basically argue an entire sex should be delayed in starting school.
Anonymous wrote:You’re calling it a preschool, but those parents essentially decided to put their 5 year olds in a private early ed for kindergarten. That was their choice, and choices have consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/14/upshot/boys-kindergarten-redshirting.html
Anonymous wrote:In my daughter’s private DC preschool, 1/3 of the children would be pushed into 1st after preschool if this rule is applied broadly. Anyone know what the principals/registrars at Key, Mann, Stoddert and Hyde are actually doing in these situations ?